Error pages "leave entire web open to hackers"
By Barry Collins
Posted on 21 Apr 2008 at 08:04
A British company that attempts to make money from mistyped web address is compromising the security of the internet's biggest companies, according to a security researcher.
The problem stems from ISPs who employ the British firm Barefruit to intercept traffic from non-existent domains, where the user has typed a web address that doesn't exist.
Instead of returning a normal error message page, Barefruit provides a list of suggestions for the site the reader may have intended to visit, as well as a series of ads.
The potential security flaw arises when the user mistypes a subdomain of a well-known website - such as webmale.google.com instead of webmail.google.com. In this instance, according to a report on renowned technology site Wired.com, the Barefruit content appears in the browser window while the title bar continues to suggest it's an official Google site.
IOActive security researcher, Dan Kaminsky, claims Barefruit's servers were vulnerable to a JavaScript attack that made it possible to serve up any links the attacker wanted, whilst still having the appearance of an official site. Such attacks could be used to fool people into divulging personal data to fake PayPal sites or Facebook accounts, for example.
Barefruit fixed the Javascript flaw last week, but Kaminsky claims the underlying problem remains. "The entire security of the internet is now dependent on some random ad server run by some British company," Kaminsky told Wired.
Barefruit was unavailable for comment at the time of publication, but the company told Wired. "Barefruit endeavors to ensure online security while providing an improved internet user interface by replacing unhelpful and confusing error messages with alternatives relevant to what the user was seeking."
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
