Computing in the real world
SEARCH FOR: IN:
Guest  Level 00    Register Log in

News 

[Internet]
Wednesday 26th March 2008
Children in danger of being "raised online" 8:53AM, Wednesday 26th March 2008
Children aged between 13 and 18 are spending more than 20 hours a week online, according to new research.

The research, conducted by the Institute for Public Policy Research, reveals that teenagers are now constantly connected, staying up into the early hours of the morning on social networking sites.

However, the institute claims that they are being put at risk by a lack of parental knowledge concerning their activities online, with 40% of eight to 11-year-olds
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT
and 71% of 12 to 15-year-olds saying they browse the web on their own. Contact with pornography was reported by 57%.

The report also issues a stark warning for parents who believe their children are protected by net nanny software, with one 14-year-old claiming: "We have restrictions at school but we can just get an administrator's account and take them off."

Among its proposals the IPPR wants Ofcom to take on an extended remit which will include making recommendations to the government about where there is a need for action, such as tackling violent user-generated content.

It also wants sites such as MySpace, Bebo and YouTube to develop what it terms cross-industry guidelines laying out what children should expect, and how they should behave online. It also wants these sites to become funding members of the Internet Watch Foundation.

At the time of writing the concerned parties were not available for comment.

Submit to: Digg  |  Slashdot  |  Del.icio.us  |  Technorati

Related News


Find Danger at Ask.com
Whatever you're looking for, find it with Ask.com.

Find Danger at Ask.com
Whatever you're looking for, find it with Ask.com.
uk.ask.com
Compare Broadband
Broadband?
Compare 50+ packages
Enter your postcode below:
Powered by:
Top 10 Broadband

Columns

Prolog:

Tim Danton endows Gates with Churchillian properties as he plants his flag in the Bill debate. › See full Opinion