Phorm "highly intrusive and illegal"
Posted on 18 Mar 2008 at 08:37
Phorm's advertising system is "highly intrusive" and illegal in the UK, claims the Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR).
The company provides a service where internet users' browsing patterns are monitored in order to serve more accurate targeted advertising.
BT, Virgin Media and TalkTalk have all signed deals to sell their customer's data to the company, and both the Guardian and MySpace have agreements in place to provide targeted advertising on their websites.
However, FIPR believes that Phorm contravenes the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) because it intercepts customers' web traffic.
"This activity involves the processing of personal data about internet users. That data may include sensitive personal data, because it will include the search terms entered by users into search engines, and these can easily reveal information about such matters as political opinions, sexual proclivities, religious views, and health," reads an open letter from the FIPR, addressed to the information commissioner, Richard Thomas.
"The Phorm system is highly intrusive - it's like the Post Office opening all my letters to see what I'm interested in, merely so that I can be sent a better class of junk mail," says Richard Clayton, treasurer of FIPR.
"Not surprisingly, when you look closely, this activity turns out to be illegal. We hope that the Information Commissioner will take careful note of our analysis when he expresses his opinion upon the scheme."
However, in the upcoming trial of the system by BT, customers will be informed that they are taking part in the scheme, and asked to opt in, which may provide a legal defence.
"We don't agree with FIPR's analysis. And its description of the Phorm system is inaccurate," says a Phorm spokesperson.
"Our technology complies with the Data Protection Act, RIPA and other applicable UK laws."
Earlier this week it emerged that BT had conducted a secret trial of the system last year, angering some customers to the point that they have threatened legal action against the company.
Other groups have also come out against the advertising system, including the Open Rights Group, whilst sites such as BadPhorm have been created specifically to highlight the potential privacy issues surrounding the company.
TOP FIVE NEWS STORIES ON PC PRO
1. Robot dog making incredible strides
2. Adobe pulls "frankly unacceptable" Photoshop update
3. Limewire launches DRM-free store
4. World "needs wind-powered" server farms
5. Google claims it's recession-proof
Author: Matthew Sparkes
advertisement
- Motorola pays Lucas for its Droid
- Where are the killer apps for Windows?
- Will you hit the Orange iPhone "unlimited" cap?
- USB 3 first benchmark - it's here, and it's fast
- Why Windows 7 has forced me to worry about security
- How Dixons is (under)selling Windows 7
- Do I like Windows 7 because it's so like a Mac?
- No Windows 7 drivers turn Dell M1330 into a doorstop
- Is Windows 7 good looking enough to sway an Apple fan?
- Typekit brings print-like typography to the web
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
- Building a better Google
- Beware HP's horrendous printer-driver glitch
- Microsoft debuts free Morro antivirus package
- Getting started with Search Server 2008 Express
advertisement

Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

