Radiohead reaps just £1 per download
By Simon Aughton
Posted on 6 Nov 2007 at 12:29
Radiohead downloaders paid an average of just £1.08 for the band's new record, In Rainbows, reports suggest.
The band invited fans to pay whatever they liked for the album and according to market research firm, ComScore, 62% elected to pay nothing whatsoever, while fewer than 12% paid more than £4.
Despite this and the huge numbers who downloaded the album peer to peer, Comscore still estimates that the band made £1.3 million from the album.
Though the band's management would not confirm the figure, it did say that Radiohead were happy with the way things have gone and noted that traffic to the band's website had increased 11-fold and was prompting sales of the £40 discbox.
"They have garnered good faith with the music consumer at a time when it's all the rage to bash the industry and the artists who ally themselves with it," says ComScore analyst Edward Hunter.
"The high percentage of users actually paying more than a few dollars for this download is actually pretty impressive," says Jim Larrison of advertising firm Adify.
"I expected the vast majority of users to download the album for free or at most a few dollars. With 40% of consumers willing to pony up real money, this is a true win for the music industry as it shows there is still perceived value in the digital form of entertainment."
But New York venture capitalist Fred Wilson was downbeat.
"This shows pretty conclusively that the majority of music consumers feel that digital recorded music should be free and is not worth paying for," he claims. "That's a large group that can't be ignored and its time to come up with new business models to serve the freeloader market."
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
