Ballmer singles out Red Hat in patent row
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 9 Oct 2007 at 12:47
Steve Ballmer has warned Red Hat customers specifically that they may have to pay Microsoft for using its intellectual property. It's the latest shot across the bows for Red Hat, which has become the target of Microsoft's attacks on the Linux community since it rejected the software giant's patent deal last year.
"People who use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property, in a sense, have an obligation eventually to compensate us," Ballmer warned at a conference in London.
"We spend a lot of money, the rest of the commercial industry spends a lot of money on R&D. When people come and say 'hey this commercial piece of software violates our patent or intellectual property', Microsoft will either get a court judgement or it'll pay a big cheque," he argues.
"I think it's important that open-source products have an obligation to participate in the same way in the intellectual property regime.
"That's why Microsoft's done the deal with Novell. It's not only working on technical interoperability between Linux and Windows but it's also made sure it can provide, for the appropriate fee, Novell customers with the rights to use its patented intellectual property."
"I think it's great the way Novell has stepped up to say intellectual property matters," he added in a backhanded swipe at Red Hat.
Red Hat has so far refused all overtures from Microsoft to sign any sort of business deal, earning the ire of the software giant which has already turned its anti-Linux site on the company.
Open source proponents have already dismissed Microsoft's tactics towards open source vendors as just "smoke and mirrors", but Ballmer went on to suggest that the question is a broader one than just Microsoft versus open source, citing its patent suit loss to Eolas in August.
"There are plenty of other people who may also have intellectual property," he says. "Every time an Eolas comes to Microsoft and says pay us, I suspect they would also eventually like to go to the open-source world too. Getting an intellectual interoperability framework between the two worlds is important."
Red Hat declined to respond to the comments.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
