Ballmer singles out Red Hat in patent row
Posted on 9 Oct 2007 at 12:47
Steve Ballmer has warned Red Hat customers specifically that they may have to pay Microsoft for using its intellectual property. It's the latest shot across the bows for Red Hat, which has become the target of Microsoft's attacks on the Linux community since it rejected the software giant's patent deal last year.
"People who use Red Hat, at least with respect to our intellectual property, in a sense, have an obligation eventually to compensate us," Ballmer warned at a conference in London.
"We spend a lot of money, the rest of the commercial industry spends a lot of money on R&D. When people come and say 'hey this commercial piece of software violates our patent or intellectual property', Microsoft will either get a court judgement or it'll pay a big cheque," he argues.
"I think it's important that open-source products have an obligation to participate in the same way in the intellectual property regime.
"That's why Microsoft's done the deal with Novell. It's not only working on technical interoperability between Linux and Windows but it's also made sure it can provide, for the appropriate fee, Novell customers with the rights to use its patented intellectual property."
"I think it's great the way Novell has stepped up to say intellectual property matters," he added in a backhanded swipe at Red Hat.
Red Hat has so far refused all overtures from Microsoft to sign any sort of business deal, earning the ire of the software giant which has already turned its anti-Linux site on the company.
Open source proponents have already dismissed Microsoft's tactics towards open source vendors as just "smoke and mirrors", but Ballmer went on to suggest that the question is a broader one than just Microsoft versus open source, citing its patent suit loss to Eolas in August.
"There are plenty of other people who may also have intellectual property," he says. "Every time an Eolas comes to Microsoft and says pay us, I suspect they would also eventually like to go to the open-source world too. Getting an intellectual interoperability framework between the two worlds is important."
Red Hat declined to respond to the comments.
Author: Stuart Turton
advertisement
- ATI Radeon HD 5970: 42% more expensive in the UK
- Office 2010 Beta – 32-bit or 64-bit – The Choice is Clear
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


