Microsoft "regrets patent deal" tactics
By Stuart Turton
Posted on 4 Oct 2007 at 17:52
Microsoft is regretting the way it handled the patent protection deal with Novell and other Linux vendors, according to open-source advocates.
The software giant claimed earlier this year that open-source software infringes 235 of its patents. Microsoft has signed business agreements with LG, Xandros, Linspire and most significantly Novell, exempting their customers from legal action over possible patent infringements.
But open-source companies believe Microsoft may regret the way it pressured the Linux vendors into signing the deals. "I think Microsoft regrets that entire path now," says John Powell, CEO of Alfresco, a content management system provider, speaking at a forum to discuss the effect of patents on open-source software. "It got a deal with Novell and wanted to put pressure on other companies, but it encountered such vitriol for it."
"[Microsoft] says it has 100 patents but it never identifies the patents. Is it not identifying the patents because it's not proud of them? Because it knows they're not valuable?" asks Jerry Rosenthal, CEO of the Open Invention Network, a group formed to protect Linux's interests by acquiring related patents.
"What we're saying is 'show us the patents' and if it's a real problem we'll work around them," adds Mark Taylor, president of the Open Source Consortium, a non-profit organisation representing open-source software firms in Europe. "It's just FUD [fear, uncertainty, doubt], it's just smoke and mirrors."
Asked how he could see the conflict between Microsoft and open-source developers going Rosenthal responds: "The worst case is that Microsoft brings litigation and we have to go and sue the company, but I don't think that'll happen.
"There'll be a continuing spread of FUD as it tries to make customers nervous. Open source is a genuine competitor now and it's found a tactic to deal with that competitor, but I think the threat is diminishing."
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
