AMD launches triple-core processsor
By Matthew Sparkes
Posted on 18 Sep 2007 at 10:58
AMD has announced the first ever triple-core x86 processor, part of its upcoming Phenom range, to complement its dual and quad-core chips.
The chips are expected in the first quarter of 2008, and will be the first triple-core processors on the market.
AMD claims that because many applications and games are now designed with dual-core processors in mind, a third core could be beneficial by taking care of background tasks, such as virus scanning. This could be a boon for gaming, where a scheduled background task can temporarily slow gameplay.
The chips won't be a true triple-core design, but a quad-core chip with one core disabled and only three functioning sets of L2 cache. This removes the need to set up a new production line, and will help to keep costs to a minimum.
A financial benefit for AMD is the fact that defective quad-core processors can now potentially be sold as triple-core, if the defects are confined only to one of the four cores.
While it may seem counter-intuitive to create a chip that has its performance deliberately crippled, it will create a wider product range for AMD - customers will be able to choose between a range of single, double, triple or quad cores at various price points. The practise of selling 'defective' CPUs at a lower price point is hardly new; Intel's 486SX processor, sold in the 1990s, was a 486DX part with the maths co-processor disabled.
AMD isn't making any specific claims about performance, except to say that the new chips will provide a significant boost over dual-core offerings, and appeal to a broader audience.
There's been no comment on pricing, but it will have to be very competitive to prevent customers opting for lower-end quad-core options instead.
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
