Rivals tell Microsoft: You got what you deserved
By Matthew Sparkes
Posted on 17 Sep 2007 at 18:49
Microsoft's rivals have applauded an EU court's decision to uphold antitrust penalties against the software giant.
The company has been fined £343m and will be forced to release a version of Windows without Media Player, after its appeal was almost wholly rejected by the EU Court of First Instance.
The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) says the court's verdict was long overdue. "Through tactics that successfully derailed antitrust processes in other parts of the world, including the United States, Microsoft has managed to postpone this day for almost a decade," says FSFE president, Georg Greve. "But thanks to the perseverance and excellent work of the European Commission, these tactics have now failed in Europe."
Grove adds that it's important for Microsoft to publish details that allow interoperable products to be created, in order to provide competition and stimulate innovation. A view echoed by Linux vendor, RedHat. "Today's decision by the Court of First Instance in Luxembourg in the Microsoft matter is great news for innovation and consumer choice," says CEO Matthew Szulik.
"In our business, interoperability information is critically important and cannot simply be withheld to exclude all competition. Red Hat would like to congratulate the European Commission for its persistence and courage in bringing this matter to a successful result."
RealNetworks, whose media player software suffered as a result of Microsoft bundling Media Player, says the verdict settles old scores. "We think that the court was right in their ruling. We believe in every business being able to play on a level playing field, and this shows that the field wasn't level," says Piers Heaton-Armstrong, European marketing director of RealNetworks. However, he adds that Real Networks "settled our differences with Microsoft a long time ago, when they paid us $761 million," in a 2005 settlement.
As for Microsoft, it remains remarkably upbeat, even taking time to thank the court for all its hard work. "It is clear that the court has agreed with the Commission on a number of the Commission's points, and I do want to simply start by expressing our gratitude to this court for the lengthy consideration that it gave to these issues," says Brad Smith, senior vice president and general counsel for the company.
"These are obviously complicated and important topics, and we appreciate all of the objective and thorough work that went into the decision."
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
