Microsoft denies sneaky Windows updates
By Barry Collins
Posted on 14 Sep 2007 at 11:04
Microsoft has denied reports that it's surreptitiously updating Windows, even on systems where automatic updates are switched off.
ZDNet's Adrian Kingsley-Hughes claimed the software giant was installing patches on his machines, even though his automatic update settings were configured to download and notify him before installation. Kingsley-Hughes claimed the "stealth updates" were the beginning of a "slippery slope", where Microsoft was updating PCs without the express permission of the owner.
However, Microsoft claims the only patches being installed on Kingsley-Hughes's machine were, ironically, critical updates to the Windows Update software itself. "Windows Update is a service that primarily delivers updates to Windows. To ensure on-going service reliability and operation, we must also update and enhance the Windows Update service itself, including its client side software," says Nate Clinton, product manager for Windows Update on his own blog. "These upgrades are important if we are to maintain the quality of the service."
Clinton insists it is essential to make these patches, even where users had requested to be informed of updates. "Any user who chooses to use Windows Update either expected updates to be installed or to at least be notified that updates were available," he argues. "Had we failed to update the service automatically, users would not have been able to successfully check for updates and, in turn, users would not have had updates installed automatically or received expected notifications.
"That result would not only fail to meet customer expectations but even worse, that result would lead users to believe that they were secure even though there was no installation and/or notification of upgrades."
However, Clinton admits Microsoft should have done a better job of explaining the update process to its customers. "The point of this explanation is not to suggest that we were as transparent as we could have been; to the contrary, people have told us that we should have been clearer on how Windows Update behaves when it updates itself.
"This is helpful and important feedback, and we are now looking at the best way to clarify WU's behavior to customers so that they can more clearly understand how WU works."
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
