Most firms fail to spot email outages
By Rene Millman
Posted on 6 Aug 2007 at 13:54
Most email outages only noticed by IT departments when users phone up to complain, according to new research.
Nearly 60 per cent of companies only notice when email systems go down when users report problems with sending and receiving, according to new research.
The study of 101 companies in the US and UK was commissioned by disaster recovery company Neverfail also found that companies experienced around 69 minutes of email downtime a month. Unsurprisingly, companies that relied on email to complete transactions or process orders were the most affected by downtime.
Respondents to the survey found that on average a company experienced 1.6 unplanned outages per month. Around $50,000 (£25,000) is lost per major incident according to figures from the research, which meant that a company could stand to lose $1 million (£500,000) per year in revenue from downtime.
The researchers said that most companies have yet to overcome the problem of email outages.
"Organisations are placing their future success at risk," says Michael Osterman, President of Osterman Research who conducted the survey. "The need for a continuous availability solution is clear, yet most organisations do not yet have such a solution in place."
The survey found that organisations that relied on BlackBerrys to keep employees in contact with their organisations were subject to even more outages with user errors, telecomx or network problems and faults with an organisation's BlackBerry Enterprise Server contributing to a company's email heartache.
Experts said that while email has become the dominant form of communication for most companies, many of them have been slow to realise these systems need to be available around the clock.
"No longer is email just one of the forms of communication for business, it is the primary form of communication for a successful business," says Andrew Barnes, Senior vice president of Corporate Development at Neverfail. "For global organisations to remain successful, they must have a stable, continuously available email environment."
From around the web
advertisement
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement
