European Parliament rubber stamps plans for "Euro MIT"
By Simon Aughton
Posted on 10 Jul 2007 at 11:09
The European Parliament has cautiously backed plans to create a European equivalent to the world-renowned Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
The European Institute of Technology (EIT) was due to begin operations next year, bringing together universities, research firms and business to focus on specific topics, such as climate change or nanotechnology.
However, MEPs want the EIT's name to include the word "innovation" and say it should be established only after a pilot phase of "two or three projects", to test its feasibility.
"Innovation is Europe's Achilles' heel," says Finnish MEP Reino Paasilinna. "It should be our main objective to increase our innovation capacity. We need more innovation in Europe to remain globally competitive in the future and to guarantee growth in jobs. The EIT could help us to realise that goal."
The European Commission and Council must now find a way to raise an estimated €2.4 billion from private and public sources to fund the new venture.
Last week, the Lords' European Union Committee said that it doubted whether the proposed institute could attract the support from business that it will need to stimulate commercially successful innovation.
"We agree that there is a need in the European Union to stimulate efforts to improve collaboration between business and universities in the commercial application of technological innovation," said Baroness Thomas of Walliswood, chairman of the Committee.
"However we do have concerns that what is currently being proposed will not be the best way to ensure that the projects taken forward are commercially successful, as well as innovative," she said. "It is vital that business is heavily involved in the EIT from the outset, and as a Committee, we feel that ensuring business buy-in must be the focus of EU efforts in establishing the EIT."
The Committee believes that more should be done to promote collaboration between businesses and universities, following the findings of a 2003 UK study. The Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration concluded that significantly more business input into universities' priority setting and decision-making processes is "a necessary condition for making sure that the projects carried out had more chance of taking account of consumer markets and of resulting in the introduction of commercially successful, as well as innovative, products and services".
Had the European Parliament commissioned a Europe-side study along these lines, its proposals may have been "different, and more effective" the Committee said.
The Committee also questioned the size of the suggested budget, noting that while the institute's operations have been scaled down significantly in the latest proposal the budget is unchanged.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs