Epson talks tough on compatible cartridges
By Dave Stevenson in Spain
Posted on 14 Jun 2007 at 14:54
Epson is planning to sue the makers of compatible ink cartridges after blaming two thirds of its printer returns on the cheap ink sellers.
The printer firm plans to clamp down on the compatible cartridge makers by enforcing its patents. It says the steps are necessary to protect both its income stream and consumers' printers.
Low-cost ink offers greatly reduced costs per printed page, with the price drop particularly noticeable for photos, where authentic inks can set you back over £1 per print. But Epson's Intellectual Property manager, Iain Friar, says 'everyone knows you get what you pay for', and that 'no-one ever bought a compatible because they thought it would be higher quality.'
Friar insists there is a 'risk of damage' associated with 'any non-Epson ink cartridge', and claims that although printer warranties are invalidated by the use of compatible ink cartridges, Epson was honouring them on machines which failed after their use.
He claims that Epson's approach 'is one of education', and 'steps are taken to make sure that the customer understands' that compatible inks are to blame for failed hardware.
Robert Clark, Epson's Director of Inkjet Business in Europe, says 67 per cent of returned printers in Europe had been using compatible ink cartridges, adding up to what he called 'unreasonable service costs for Epson and none for the third party manufacturer'.
Epson insists that it is taking a 'very even-handed approach' to tackling the compatible cartridge maker. Epson 'never makes frivolous complaints about [compatible ink manufacturers]', says Friar, and was an 'innovator' that didn't waste time in court 'unless it was necessary'.
Do you use compatible ink cartridges in your inkjet, and if so, have you ever experienced any print quality or hardware reliability problems? Let us know via the Comments button below.
From around the web
"You get what you pay for..."
So say Epson. Really? Does this mean that Epson (and the rest) think their ink is value for money? Quotes of £1 per 1ml as a guide price are not uncommon, even after taking the cost of the cartridge and logistics into consideration. To put that into perspective that's over £4,500 a gallon. And that, by any stretch of the imagination, is shocking. Even taking into account the potentially subsidised cost of the printers it's still a shocker.
Don't charge a rip-off price for genuine ink cartridges and people would not be inclined to chance their luck with compatibles. We have been ripped off for years, then as soon as the industry starts losing money it starts bleating about what it is costing them. Not nice when the boot's on someone else's foot is it?
By coolcity on 4 Dec 2010 ![]()
Epson Inks
I have successfully used compatible inks in my various Epsons for over six years. The day I have to pay the price for 'genuine' cartridges is the day my printer follows the Lexmark to the tip
By pete777 on 4 Jan 2012 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement
