First test: Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS & GT
Posted on 17 Apr 2007 at 14:56
Curious to see how the 8600 GTS compares to the higher-end 8800 GTS, we ramped up the testing to our High settings (see below). Again Far Cry produced a playable frame rate of 36fps, but Call of Duty 2 proved more troublesome, as our test requires 512MB of local graphics memory thanks to the Extra texture settings we use. The score of 18fps is therefore unrepresentative of the GPU.
Using the 256MB-friendly High textures and dropping the AA and AF produced a barely tolerable 32fps. Oblivion is playable at 1,600 x 1,200 with no AA and AF though, racing along at 42fps.
This can't compare to even the GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB card, though, which scored 57fps in Oblivion with 4x AA and 8x AF in the same test rig. The 8800 clearly remains the most future-proof investment.

Far Cry (standard settings)

Call of Duty 2 (standard settings, no AA or AF)
Conclusions
All of this is pretty good news for Nvidia fans - as are the projected pricings. At $149 we expect the 8600 GT to cost around £80-100 over here, and considering it will blitz all your games at 1,280 x 1,024 without any image quality sacrifices, it's looking an attractive buy.
The 8600 GTS meanwhile is projected to cost $199 to $229, which should translate to £110-130. Again, considering the bags of performance on offer that's an incredible price.
Cards are already available from online retailers and there's even the extra promise of 100% GPU-based High Definition decoding. Alas we haven't had time to fully test this yet, but we'll update you as soon as we have the results.
SETTINGS
Standard settings
Far Cry - 1,280 x 1024, no AA or AF, maximum detail settings, HDR
Call of Duty 2 - 1,280 x 1,024, 4xAA, 8xAF, High texture settings
Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - 1,280 x 1,024, 4xAA, 8xAF, maximum detail settings
High settings
Far Cry - 1,600 x 1,200, no AA, 8xAF, maximum detail settings, HDR
Call of Duty 2 - 1,600 x 1,200, 4xAA, 8xAF, Extra texture settings
Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - 1,600 x 1,200, 4xAA, 8xAF, maximum detail settings
TEST KIT
2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E6700; Intel 975XBX motherboard; 1GB Corsair 800MHz RAM; 36GB Western Digital Raptor
Author: Clive Webster
advertisement
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Microsoft Word 2010 screenshots: Text Effects
- Microsoft Word 2010: inserting screenshots
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk





