Microsoft used undocumented Windows APIs - Iowa testimony
By Simon Aughton
Posted on 15 Jan 2007 at 12:11
Microsoft used undocumented APIs that allowed its developers to write programs that worked better with Windows than competitors', according to the latest testimony in the Iowa antitrust action against the company.
The claim was made by software expert Ronald Alepin, giving evidence on behalf of the plaintiffs, as the court case resumed after its Christmas hiatus.
According to the plaintiff's account of the court proceedings, Alepin referred to a series of internal Microsoft emails, that he said showed that although these APIs (application programming interfaces) were provided to developers 'they were simply inserted into several megabytes of notes onto a CD-ROM, in a "very low profile" intended to "discourage" developers from using them and to provide enough "air cover" to allow Microsoft to say they were documented'.
In one of the emails a Microsoft product manager noted the number of 'hidden' APIs.
'All I can say is holy API batman...I'm not kidding...we are talking about literally 500-800 APIs here, no joke,' he wrote.
Alepin had earlier claimed that Microsoft ran special demonstration programs whose sole purpose was to crash rival products and alleged that the company had subverted developers who used Microsoft's version of Java 'thinking they were developing multi-platform applications, but were actually developing Windows-specific applications'.
The Iowa case - Comes v Microsoft - is attempting to show that Microsoft's business practices unfairly harmed consumers. The case has enjoyed widespread publicity after the plaintiffs submitted a 2004 email 'rant' from Microsoft executive Jim Allchin to CEO Steve Ballmer and chairman Bill Gates deploring the then-state of Windows development and saying that were he not a Microsoft employee he would buy a Mac. Apple CEO Steve Jobs added the quotation to his Macworld keynote last week, joking that the staff of Apple's Seattle store should be on the lookout for Allchin.
In its opening address last month Microsoft defended Windows' $50 price tag and rejected the argument that it depends on its monopoly of PC desktops to sell its software, instead insisting that it was the high quality and low prices of the company's software that drove consumer demand.
Having received permission from judge Rosenberg, the plaintiffs are posting daily court transcripts, admitted trial exhibits, and other information from trial at iowaconsumercase.org. Microsoft is also posting updates, on the legal news section of its website.
The case continues.
Is your business a social business? For helpful info and tips visit our hub.
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- Windows Easy Transfer – not so "easy" in Windows 8.1
- Formula 1: what a difference virtualisation makes
- Office of the future: comfy chairs and tablets everywhere
- I went to Glastonbury and the only thing that got high was my smartphone
- Meet the robots helping teach children
- PaperLater: would you pay to print the internet?
- Amazon vs Kobo: how much to make the ebook switch?
- Phishing emails: how I nearly got caught out
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?