Vista vs Apple
Posted on 5 Jun 2006 at 12:19
There's never been a better time to switch to the Mac. Apple has seen sense and moved to Intel processors and, in a move that nobody could have predicted, now lets us boot Windows as a native operating system.
There's never been a better time to switch to the Mac. Apple has seen sense and moved to Intel processors and, in a move that nobody could have predicted, now lets us boot Windows as a native operating system. Yet its own OS, Tiger, is stronger than ever. Happy to run on low-spec kit, it's quick and easy to learn, and at just £89 it's nothing short of a bargain.
Yet there's never been a better time to stick with Windows either. It's well supported, it plays host to the widest range of software and peripherals, it's well understood, it's the industry standard, and it's fast approaching its first major upgrade in years. With Windows Vista slated for an early 2007 shrinkwrap release, the future has never looked brighter for the OS that already dominates our desktops.
So which is right for you? If you find yourself in the enviable position of having cash for a new computer, we could easily forgive any confusion you may feel over which platform to choose. Macs and PCs are more closely matched than ever before, and while Mac sales have never been stronger, boosted by the so-called iPod halo effect, Windows' future is both exciting and bright.
With this in mind, we've set out to directly compare the two operating systems - Windows Vista Beta 2 and Mac OS X 10.4.6 Tiger - to see how their relative pros and cons stack up. We've scrutinised the eight key considerations of a new computer buyer, taking in everything from gaming to security and entertainment to cross-platform use in the business world. Lastly, we take a look at the total cost of ownership and the kind of hardware you'll need to run each one, and it's here we make some truly surprising discoveries.
Where possible, we've pitted directly comparable features against one another, but we've also tried to pick out those aspects unique to each OS, whether they're part of the interface, the bundled utilities and applications, or the underlying code and protocols that make it all hang together.
To make this possible, we ran Vista and Tiger side by side throughout our tests, but if you're wondering which one we used to write the words themselves... well, that too will be revealed in due course.
advertisement
- Kindle update brings native PDF support
- Lenovo launches first ever ThinkCentre all-in-one PC
- Average mobile broadband speed only 0.87Mbits/sec
- iPhone hitting Tesco in time for Christmas
- Gmail adds offline attachments
- Mobile data surges up by 16% in October
- OFT: Google isn't harming consumers
- £90 million buys South Yorkshire 25Mbits/sec broadband
- Twitter ready to splash out... and run ads
- LogMeIn Express offers fuss-free screen sharing
- Need a bit of extra Christmas cash? Grass up your boss, says BSA
- Photoshop Mobile on Android review: first look
- ATI Radeon HD 5970: 42% more expensive in the UK
- Office 2010 Beta – 32-bit or 64-bit – The Choice is Clear
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


