Samsung Galaxy S4 vs HTC One
Posted on 10 May 2013 at 09:23
We compare the Samsung Galaxy S4 with the HTC One, head-to-head across all the key categories
Much has been written in the build up to the launch of the Samsung Galaxy S4, but now that it’s finally here, how does it measure up to its chief rival – the HTC One? Here we’ve compared the key features of both phones across five categories to give you a comprehensive overview of where each handset’s strengths and weaknesses lie.
Design, appearance and practicality
This is the area where debate is most fierce. There’s no doubt that the HTC’s curved anodised aluminium chassis is the better looking of the two. Although a touch more bulky, the One is a more pleasant device to hold in the hand than the S4, and it’s the phone that feels the most luxurious.
In comparison, the S4’s shiny plastic rear panel feels cheap, and we’re none too convinced about the rather filmy plastic membrane that surrounds the camera lens. In the short time we’ve been using the S4 it’s picked up more scuffs and scratches than we’d expect.
The flipside of Samsung’s approach is that the rear panel can be replaced if you drop, scratch or scuff it, whereas you’re stuck with your HTC One if you damage it. The removable rear panel also gives access to a user-replaceable battery and microSD slot, both features the HTC One is missing.
In the end it’s a tie in this category, with the HTC One edging it on looks and quality, and the Samsung Galaxy S4 regaining ground with its practicality.
Winner: A tie
Despite being lighter and slimmer than the HTC One, the Samsung Galaxy S4 has a larger display: 5in compared to 4.7in. That instantly swings things in the S4’s favour, and the quality of the display is fabulous.
The 1,080 x 1,920 resolution is high enough so you can’t see the pixels, with a pixel density of 441ppi. As you’d expect from a Super AMOLED display, colours are super-saturated, with graphics taking on a luminescent quality.
The colours on the HTC’s Super LCD 3 display are a little more laid back, but in terms of all-round quality the One edges in front. Because it has the same number of pixels squeezed into a smaller space, the pixel density is a touch higher at 469ppi; more importantly, it’s a brighter screen. The HTC One’s display goes up to 481cd/m2, where the Samsung’s hits only 221cd/m2.
That extra brightness means the HTC One’s display is a touch more readable in sunlight, and in side-by-side tests, the HTC’s brighter white levels help give images, web pages and games more impact. It’s a close-run thing, but the One has the edge in this category.
Winner: HTC One
The HTC One and Samsung Galaxy S4 take very different approaches with their cameras. The One’s snapper only offers a resolution of 4-megapixels, which seems low in today’s market, where every other manufacturer is squeezing more in. HTC’s argument is that fewer pixels means bigger pixels and thus lower noise in low-light images. The camera also features optical image stabilisation, another feature designed to help out in murky conditions.
The Samsung Galaxy S4, on the other hand, crams 13 megapixels onto its sensor. Both the S4 and the One shoot 1080p video at up to 30fps. The S4 lacks the optical image stabilisation of the HTC One, though, instead relying on the less effective digital method.
So which is best? In terms of features the S4 is the clear winner. Although the HTC has its own novelty items – including the Cinemagram-alike animated photo feature, Zoe – the Samsung has far more, from the rather silly Sound and Shot, which records audio and pictures simultaneously, to the more useful Best Face feature, which shoots a sequence of a group of people, then allows you to pick and choose the best facial expressions for each.
When it comes to quality, however, the differences are more subtle. In good light, the S4’s extra pixels deliver more detail, but this is only evident when you zoom right into the frame. In low light, the HTC wins, with images exhibiting lower levels of distracting noise, leading to cleaner snaps.
In terms of general colour balance and automatic exposures it’s a close-run thing, but for our money, the HTC One produces the more reliable, more balanced exposures and colours. However, the S4 makes a swift comeback, with slightly quicker autofocus and a superior macro mode. Its optical stabiliser gives steadier and smoother video footage than the S4, too.
The bottom line is the quality of both cameras is excellent; in this category they’re neck and neck.
Winner: A tie
Under the hood, the two phones have the same processor – a quad-core Snapdragon 600 – but in each handset it’s set at a different speed. In the HTC, it runs at 1.7GHz; in the Samsung it runs at 1.9GHz. Both handsets have 2GB of RAM.
In the benchmarks, that extra 0.2GHz of clock speed gives the Samsung Galaxy S4 the edge. In all but the Peacekeeper HTML5 test it finished ahead of the HTC One. You can see the figures at a glance in the graph below (note: a lower score is better in Sunspider).
Again, though, that doesn’t tell the whole story. In real-world use, the HTC One is the slicker feeling handset, performing everything you ask of it instantly and without delay. The Samsung Galaxy S4’s UI, on the other hand, is beset by annoying pauses, juddering and odd little hesitations that, after a short while, begin to grate.
A particularly bad example of this is the Story Maker app, which is designed to produce realistic photo albums, complete with animated page turns. It’s a nice idea, but browsing albums created with the software is a frustrating business: page turn animations are, more often than not, horribly stilted, and swipes don’t always cause the pages to turn.
Winner: HTC One
We’ve already intimated what we think about the software in the previous section, but it’s clear that HTC has lavished more time getting Sense just right than Samsung has with TouchWiz. For while TouchWiz in its latest incarnation is incredibly powerful, offering a huge range of features - from innovative control systems to a bundled, voice-activated translation tool, a split-screen mode and more - it feels cluttered and messy.
Say what you like about BlinkFeed – HTC’s default home screen layout, which feeds social media updates and news headlines into one, vertically scrolling list – but you cannot but be impressed by the elegant simplicity of the rest of the UI. The app drawer can be organised through the use of folders, which can’t be done on the S4, and the whole thing feels more grown up.
Winner: HTC One
With both phones coming in dead level on battery life and at a similar price on contract, it’s pretty clear from totting up the wins in each category, which phone deserves your cash. Surprisingly, it isn’t the Samsung Galaxy S4, it’s the HTC One, with victory in three out of the five categories, and ties in the remaining two.
Overall winner: HTC One
Author: Jonathan Bray
No doubt S4 users will say you're making too much fuss over the plastic build but I have to agree with the above. The One is the better phone IMO and not just on build quality.
Sense is a LOT better than previous versions whereas TW has bloated with useless gimmicky features. Shame as the S3 is a great phone
By EddyOS_2K9 on 10 May 2013
A quick Google shows these phones to cost roughly £560.
I was wondering how they would compare to the Nexus 4, which only costs £270?
By Wilbert3 on 10 May 2013
Vrs Lumia 920???
My next phone won't be an iphone. At the minute I am considering the HTC One, S4 and Lumia 920. After reading this I guess it won't be the S4, so how does Nokia's current flagship fare in a direct head to head with the HTC?
By srmcbain on 10 May 2013
Or indeed the Galaxy S3 which is now £328.
By Ranread on 10 May 2013
One/S4 vs Nexus
The screen is a LOT better on the One/S4 than my current Nexus 4 although I prefer the muted colour reproduction of LCDs than the over-saturated colours of AMOLED
I do prefer stock Android, though, and I wish HTC/Samsung would embrace the AOSP like Sony have lately
By EddyOS_2K9 on 10 May 2013
"With both phones coming in dead level on battery life..."
Out of the box, I expect that's true for both but for me it's not a minor point that the S4 has as long a battery life as you can be bothered to carry around spare batteries.
By Alex_G on 10 May 2013
I've owned two 920s since November and switched to the HTC One recently (my previous Android was the Galaxy S2). Overall 920 was superior but with some big caveats and I probably wouldn’t recommend it. HTC One has some higher end features and text on web pages is easier to read - but not substantially. Configuring HTC One to give me the information I want at a glance is almost impossible and the BlinkFeed is very limited. HTC One has a few times not re-connected to network if it loses it (i.e. on exiting Undergound). Android has some pros in terms of better calendaring (Windows Phone is awful) and more apps but overall the camera, ease of use, Live Tiles and Nokia apps made the 920 a better phone, BUT, I owned two 920s and both bricked themselves and had to be replaced. I would recommend to wait and see what the 928 is going to look like.
By MWhite on 10 May 2013
Case or no case
In a case the verdict would go to the S4, and really, who is not going to put their £500 phone into a case?
But even so the 2 ties and 3 wins were really pretty much 4 ties or 5 if you factor in personal taste. Both good phones pick whichever one you like the best.
Both better than the current iphone though.
By cliffxdavis on 10 May 2013
Re saturated AMOLED colours: the S3 has a 'natural' preset that gets rid of the saturated colours. Presume S4 has the same. That screen is looking a little dim in bright sunlight thobut...
I'd also suggest that a replaceable battery and microSD slot are such major features for power users that it hands the S4 a win for many.
By Mark_Thompson on 10 May 2013
Thx - that's exactly the sort of info I was looking for. Roll on the 928!
By srmcbain on 10 May 2013
"and we’re none too convinced about the rather filmy plastic membrane that surrounds the camera lens."
The camera lens does not feel filmy in the slightest. This might sound a little silly but did you actually remember to take the protective film off? It was quite hard to take off and I could quite easily be missed.
As for the other areas of the review, you have failed to mention how the Samsung has superior gorilla glass 3 and can be used with gloves.
By lukesoad on 11 May 2013
Plastic is always cheap?
I won't deny the HTC One is designed but I never picked up my Galaxy S2 and thought to my self the plastic makes it feel really cheap.
A lot of quality products are made of plastic but in Samsung's case the instant the competitors started using something other then plastic, plastic is now bad.
My sister just get herself a Galaxy S4 and it doesn't feel cheap, it doesn't feel like it will fall apart.
I can understand if it is the normal to make High-end phones from aluminium or something other then plastic but that's not the case and trying to find a fault when there is none is stupid.
By firstsin on 11 May 2013
Since when was the look non subjective
I am sorry but immediately took offence to the line: "There’s no doubt that the HTC’s curved anodised aluminium chassis is the better looking of the two."
How patronising is a blanket statement like that. You are certainly entitled to your view but to suggest that it is the only opinion that counts is a best presumptuous or at worst patronising.
Personally, based on the photo, the aluminium at the stop and bottom of the HTC one make it look unattractive to me.
By dwmoook on 12 May 2013
As commented in a lot of other places, it isn't the fact that the case is made out of plastic (aka polycarbonate) that's the issue - its the quality of the polycarbonate used.
@srmcbain - thank you for your vote. you've successfully managed to vote for a phone that wasn't in the head-to-head. Twice. In addition, I think the phone you referred to is a CDMA Verizon exclusive. The other alternative is the 925, and I don't think it mentioned expandable battery, and the initial offering was for 16gb only iirc.
personally, i'm wondering whether I wouldn't just go for a note 2 if the screen hits 5 inches. What muddies the water even more is the fact that the actual sizes of the phones are so similar. What I gain in screen size and additional first party apps on one phone, I lose out on quality of screen and better sound on the other.
By khellan on 15 May 2013
Gotta go with samsung on this one, although I do like the HTC model.
By Maximus758 on 7 Aug 2013
For more details about purchasing this feature and/or images for editorial usage, please contact Jasmine Samra on email@example.com
- Windows 8.2: release date, features and free cloud version
- Chrome Remote Desktop now available on Android
- Sony warns of fresh VAIO battery fires
- 4G version of Surface 2 launched in the UK
- BlackBerry CEO says not selling off phones "any time soon"
- 13 May: the day we'll know if Microsoft is really abandoning Windows XP
- Office for iPad hits 12m downloads, but receives poor reviews
- Windows Phone 8.1 gets its own PA: Cortana
- 24m vulnerable home routers ready to launch DDoS attacks
- Mozilla's Eich: my views on gay marriage are irrelevant
- Hello Cortana, it's nice to meet you
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information