The future according to Microsoft
Posted on 4 Jan 2013 at 14:07
We explore Microsoft's research labs, with projects to improve gesture recognition and eliminate blue screen errors
When it comes to carrying out research, Microsoft plays the long game. At the moment, its researchers are working on sociological improvements to search, improving gesture recognition systems, and solving hundred-year-old mathematical theorems. While that may not sound like a route to improving software and hardware, give Microsoft some credit – it’s already reduced the occurrences of the Blue Screen of Death.
Microsoft Research (MSR) has 1,000 employees working globally, including 150 at its Cambridge lab taking up three floors on the grounds of the famous university, says Ken Woodberry, its deputy managing director. The goal of the lab isn’t product development, but furthering academic knowledge in fields such as computing science and mathematics.
See alsoFuture technology: in the R&D labs
The future according to ARM
The future according to Google
The future according to HP
The future according to Intel
“The people who work here would otherwise be academics,” says Woodberry. “We measure ourselves using a couple of metrics, but one of the primary ones is simply as though we were academics.” This means using “strong, peer-reviewed publications [and] status in the academic world”.
Of course, Microsoft funds its research department with a purpose: bringing innovations and expertise to the larger company, to help as needed.
The kind of people we tend to hire want to have an impact in the wider world, so they tend to work on problems that will eventually have some relevance to the company
“It’s entirely bottom-up; we hire smart people and let them do what they want to do. The kind of people we tend to hire want to have an impact in the wider world, so they tend to work on problems that will eventually have some relevance to the company.”
“It gives you a deep pool of expertise in areas that the company might not realise is important now, but will turn out to be important later on,” he says. “Search was something that famously we were a little late on, as a company. However, as soon as we realised we had to do something in that area, we had such a tremendous amount of expertise in the relevant computer science areas in MSR that it turned out they could turn their hands to building Bing.”
One area of focus for Microsoft’s Cambridge lab is gesture recognition – this is the firm that invented Kinect, after all. While the games console system didn’t actually stem from lab research, it was refined by it. The Kinect team ran into one or two problems, and they knew that MSR had expertise in computer vision and related areas. “We were able to help them solve those problems... we’re quite proud of that,” says Woodberry.
Another gesture-related hardware product is Digits. “It’s a wrist-worn device that lets you track the movements of your fingers – if you turned it into a product, it might be a watch. As you move your fingers, imagine you’re typing in mid-air; it can know exactly what your fingers are doing.”
The interaction works as though the user is wearing data-collecting gloves, analysing the hand’s movement in 3D using lasers and an infrared camera, and comparing that to a 3D model of a hand – the researchers spent hours staring at their own hands to try to understand how the system should work. It allows users to interact with a device anywhere – accessing a smartphone that’s still in your pocket, for example. Aside from interacting with mobile devices, Digits could also be combined with Kinect for console gaming: demo videos show users pointing at the screen and pulling their “trigger” finger to shoot.
The first versions of Digits were made using off-the-shelf parts, so it’s bulkier than the researchers would like, but by making specialised components, it could be the size of a wristwatch.
Does any of this matter
The question that needs to be answered is whether there is a real future for Microsoft as a force in computing. It is largely a commodity software company. Once we can all do mail and browsing on *any* device what is there left to do? When was the last time any of us did something in Word we could not have done by another means?
By milliganp on 5 Jan 2013
Let's hope Microsoft does think research and engineering matters.
By TheHonestTruth on 7 Jan 2013
For more details about purchasing this feature and/or images for editorial usage, please contact Jasmine Samra on email@example.com
- BBC admits £100 million IT project was a "waste"
- ISPs offer network-level porn filters to dodge "regulatory threats"
- Intel: PC designs "not compelling enough"
- Microsoft reinstates the Start button – on a mouse
- Google considers $1 billion bid for satnav firm Waze
- Hyperoptic extends 1Gbit/sec broadband beyond London
- Lenovo defies PC slump to post 90% profit increase
- Schools warm up to BYOD for tablets
- Xbox One: what it means for Windows PCs
- IBM's Watson answers customers' questions
- Is it worth upgrading a media centre to Windows 8?
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Nokia Lumia 925 review: first look
- Why I won't subscribe to Creative Cloud
- GoPro camera strapped to a remote-control helicopter: the ultimate boy's toy
- Acer Iconia A1 review: first look
- Acer Aspire P3 review: first look
- Acer Aspire R7 review: first look
- How we produce the PC Pro podcast