How social networks sold your privacy
Posted on 23 Mar 2012 at 15:11
Stewart Mitchell investigates how sites such as Facebook and Google+ are cashing in on your personal information
When Facebook persuaded 800 million users to sign up, few subscribers would have realised they were the raw materials in a multibillion-pound production line, yet this is exactly how the company treats their information.
Facebook, Google+ and advertising networks have turned exploiting personal data into an art form – and for the most part, consumers have given the information freely.
Last year, Facebook generated $4.27 billion in revenue, according to figures from research house eMarketer, and estimates from various market watchers have suggested the company will be worth $100 billion if it floats later this year as expected. No wonder Google wanted a piece of the action and launched a rival to supplement its already groaning repositories of user information.
If anybody feels uncomfortable revealing information then they don’t have to
Yet companies using personal details online face ongoing battles, with privacy advocates bemoaning the way they share with advertisers. For marketing professionals, on the other hand, the privacy debate is effectively over. Once users upload their information, it’s open season.
“Facebook, Google+, Twitter and the like give users a huge degree of control in terms of the information they provide or that is made available to others,” says Dave Bird, managing director of UK digital marketing agency Webtistic.co.uk. “If anybody feels uncomfortable revealing information then they don’t have to.”
Even so, users may still be surprised by just how much data is available to advertisers or anyone else who wants to snoop on their (once personal) information.
Between Facebook, Google, Twitter, cookies and information sold by the Government to companies such as 192.com, there’s a wealth of personal data available on most people online, and even if it isn’t shared in an identifiable way, that doesn’t stop it spreading.
Facebook, for example, has no interest in selling identifiable personal information to its advertisers, but that doesn’t mean it won’t share details – just that they’ll be anonymous, in part to protect user privacy, but also to safeguard its greatest asset.
“One of the biggest misconceptions is that Facebook passes on information, but actually it doesn’t,” says Max Schrems, a driving force behind the Europe-v-Facebook.org action group that’s seeking action against Facebook’s practices via the Irish data commissioner. “It gives you the option to advertise to certain people, and to use that information, but it wouldn’t give your information to other people – that would be stupid because that’s Facebook’s treasure; you wouldn’t give that out to anyone else.”
Find out morePrivacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
Facebook confirms that it won’t share anything personally identifiable, but that doesn’t mean it won’t cash in on the information in other ways.
With users posting their relationship status, interests and location data, and interacting with groups and friends, Facebook can generate finely honed profiles for its advertisers to target.
It may feel like an invasion of privacy, but web businesses point out the information has been freely given and is essential to keep many websites running, because targeted advertising pays the bills.
Most consumers couldn't care less tbh
...and there's absolutely nothing the average joe consumer will do about it...
By nicomo on 25 Mar 2012
For more details about purchasing this feature and/or images for editorial usage, please contact Jasmine Samra on firstname.lastname@example.org
- Xbox One: what it means for Windows PCs
- IBM's Watson answers customers' questions
- New CEO reorganises Intel to target "new devices"
- Flexible tablets closer to reality with graphene ink
- Flickr offers "awesome" 1TB of free storage
- EU promises single telecoms market by 2015
- iOS 7: release date, features and more
- Yahoo promises not to "screw up" Tumblr
- Dell profits slide 79% amid buyout talks
- Forget cloud subscriptions: users prefer standard licences
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Nokia Lumia 925 review: first look
- Why I won't subscribe to Creative Cloud
- GoPro camera strapped to a remote-control helicopter: the ultimate boy's toy
- Acer Iconia A1 review: first look
- Acer Aspire P3 review: first look
- Acer Aspire R7 review: first look
- How we produce the PC Pro podcast
- Google Now draining iPhone battery