Skip to navigation
Analysis

The emergency internet bunkers

Posted on 11 Mar 2011 at 04:45

Nik Rawlinson investigates the impregnable underground bunkers that will keep the net running during wartime

The Doomsday Clock shows 23:54. If it ever reaches midnight, mankind’s survival will be on the brink.

Since 1947, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has used the face of this fictional clock to plot our race towards destruction. In 1949, the Soviets tested their first atomic bomb, and they pushed the clock to 23:57. Four years later, the US and Soviets both tested thermonuclear weapons and so the clock ticked on to 23:58.

The clock has never been any further back than 23:43; it happened only once, in 1991. The Berlin Wall had just come tumbling down; Gorbachev and Bush Senior had signed up to Start, the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

The world breathed a sigh of relief, but not for long. Twenty years have passed since then, and things have taken a turn for the worse. Pakistan and India both hold nuclear weapons. North Korea, too, almost certainly has its own, and Iran’s motives are causing the West some sleepless nights.

A handful of datacenters dotted around the world would likely to be all that remains of the multi-billion-pound hosting industry

All-out war remains a fairly unlikely scenario, but should the clock ever strike midnight we may well discover, finally, whether or not the internet really could survive a nuclear conflict.

If it could, then a handful of datacenters dotted around the world would likely to be all that remains of the multi-billion-pound hosting industry.

These secretive, high-security sites, tunnelled out of mountains or housed behind the blast-proof doors of one-time Nato bunkers, are home to the planet’s most secure hosting providers.

THE US SECURE HOSTING CENTER

A high point on the Iowa plains is home to a handful of buildings.

Whitewashed and nondescript, only the mast beside them hints at their former use. Built at the height of the Cold War, these are the access points to a hardened underground bunker; a hidden world of reinforced doors, concrete floors 5ft thick and walls lined with welded-seam steel to reflect the electromagnetic pulse of a thermonuclear explosion.

Once a critical hub in the US Government’s communications network, the bunker formed part of a chain of underground transmission sites. Now it’s home to the USSHC, also known as the US Secure Hosting Center.

“A lot of these Cold War sites were destroyed or abandoned,” explained the Center’s Isaac Helgens. “Since this campus was operated from the outset by a telco acting for the Government, we were able to purchase it directly from them without any issues. Occasionally, even today, we run into a Government entity that isn’t aware the site is privately owned, but that’s usually the extent of the confusion.”

The vault doors that seal off the silo were built to withstand the blast effects, heat and 800mph-plus winds of a 20-megaton nuclear blast, but the technology they now protect was barely dreamt of when they first swung open.

“The biggest things we’ve had to adjust in our infrastructure were cooling and power utilisation,” said Helgens. “Wherever possible, we simply updated and maintained the original technology. As this was designed for emergency use, most systems are 2N+ redundant [have two or more stages of redundancy].”

Man-made conflict is only one of the risks against which USSHC considers itself immune. The site where it sits is more than two miles from – and 200m above – the nearest flood plain.

It has two wells and a large enough water-storage facility to keep running water for a fortnight in the unlikely event they should both run dry. With no other tenants on its plot and located well away from population centres or terrorist targets, its clients (“technology directors at the forefront of their fields”) are attracted by an environment so stable and secure that they’re willing to host their sites wholesale with USSHC, rather than spread their servers across multiple datacenters.

With a sub-micron air-filtration plant, USSHC’s facility is well equipped to cope with physical viruses, but what of their digital equivalent, and DDoS attacks or trojan incursion? Helgens assures us that his team goes “to great effort” with its clients to prevent them.

USSHC employs customised intrusion detection for its clients and monitors its network for any such issues. “In the event of a DoS or DDoS, we attempt to isolate the threat and use creative routing and other techniques to make sure our clients remain unaffected,” Helgens said.

THE CYBERBUNKER

USSHC isn’t unique. Europe is dotted with similar sites, each of which could withstand a nuclear blast.

Netherlands-based CyberBunker is housed inside a hardened concrete silo. Built by Nato in 1955, it was designed to outlast a nuclear war and keep those inside safe for up to a decade.

1 2 3 4
Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here
User comments

Research?

So busy looking at the bunkers, someone forgot to check the history of the Atomic bomb.
The U.S. actually tested their fist device some time BEFORE the Soviets, not a year later - to which Japan will testify, twice...

By greemble on 11 Mar 2011

Lost Cause

An all out nuclear global war would still be as detrimental today as yesteryear.
Living in a bunker is only so good as to come out when something is remaining. A global nuclear war would practically sterilise the planet.

The modern war-fare game is FINANCIAL MARKETS.
The internet needs to be up and running to win this sort of war.

Looking at the financial deficits of various countries, the trade imbalances and the likelihood of bankruptcy; would you not say the war is already over?

By lenmontieth on 12 Mar 2011

I only got as far as the second paragraph before scrolling down to read the comments - I see greemble got there before me.

How on earth did that make it past the editor? It was one of the most significant acts in human history, so it's a bit of a big thing to just somehow forget...

By Mr_John_T on 12 Mar 2011

Research further

Actually, the USA did three tests. The first one was in the US desert. The second two were done over cities in the aggressor country of Japan. All tests were successful. The Russians were late comers to that game.

By pandoratta on 12 Mar 2011

Error corrected

Apologies for the error on the nuclear weapon dates. Now corrected.

Barry Collins
Editor

By Barry_Collins on 12 Mar 2011

interesting choice of bunkers

Because Cyberbunker has been involved with large-scale DDoSsing, massive spamruns, bulletproof hosting and to top it all: They've been shutdown for months when a XTC-factory was found next to the serverrooms.

Most of it can still be found in Google. I for one wouldn't anything with people with histories like these.

By clusternode on 12 Mar 2011

XTC

I didn't know about Cyberbunker being shut down for manufacturing XTC, but I personally believe anything that stops the production of British New Wave is a Good Thing.

By sprowell on 13 Mar 2011

Come on! Get real! A building like the one shown could be knocked down with several weapons available to any modern Air Force. 9 ft. walls so what? Then there is the disturbing fact that there will be nothing LEFT top-side to connect to in the event of all out N. war. All the cyber money will just go Pffffffft! But this whole article is designed to ally the fears of the clueless. I hope this makes everyone feel better!

By Skipdallas on 15 Mar 2011

Come on! Get real! A building like the one shown could be knocked down with several weapons available to any modern Air Force. 9 ft. walls so what? Then there is the disturbing fact that there will be nothing LEFT top-side to connect to in the event of all out N. war. All the cyber money will just go Pffffffft! But this whole article is designed to ally the fears of the clueless. I hope this makes everyone feel better!

By Skipdallas on 15 Mar 2011

Sorry for the double entry. I don't know what happened,redundancy run amok I suppose!

By Skipdallas on 15 Mar 2011

Madmod

To my way of thinking any facility buried in a mountain stands more chance of survival than one situated above ground, my question is: Why would anyone want to host a million gigs of porn alongside the stockmarket closing prices thirty metres below Stockholm when there were neither dirty old men or brokers left on the surface to view them? It would be too much to hope, I suppose, that some of the servers might contain information which might be of use to survivors - if any.

By Madmod on 16 Mar 2011

"Four years later"

Partially corrected - The U.S. was two years later & Soviets were four years on. While technically correct, it can be misleading.

I guess word count matters more than accuracy in journalism...

By greemble on 16 Mar 2011

jim

greemble 1 out of 10 for reading

By JimAbz1 on 2 Jun 2011

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

For more details about purchasing this feature and/or images for editorial usage, please contact Jasmine Samra on pictures@dennis.co.uk

advertisement

Most Commented Features
Latest News StoriesSubscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
Loading
WEB ID
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.