How to choose a digital camera
Posted on 6 Aug 2009 at 13:02
Buying a digital camera is a minefield of high numbers and fancy but pointless features, but don't be swayed by the marketing.
There’s a bewildering choice of cameras on the market, but if you follow some simple guidelines you can narrow down the choice.
If you’re considering spending a couple of hundred pounds or more on a camera, we’d always recommend heading to a physical shop to try your prospective purchase rather than just ordering from the internet.
Many shops can come within £10 or £20 of the online price, and it’s well worth it to be able to handle the camera before you buy.
Image quality is more difficult to scrutinise, but there are plenty of ways to find out whether a particular camera takes great pictures or not. Magazine and internet reviews, forums and photo-sharing websites such as Flickr can offer both advice and proof of a camera’s quality. Some manufacturers also have sample photos on their websites.
However, before thinking about specific models, you need to decide what type of camera is going to suit you best. The choice can be broken down into three main groups: compacts, superzooms and DSLRs.
To find out more about each of these categories, click on the link below:
What about megapixels?
You’ll notice that we haven’t made a big deal of the megapixel rating in your choice of camera.
That’s because these days it’s basically irrelevant. There are very few cameras on the market with a rating of below 6 megapixels – that is, 6 million individual dots making up each picture. Most cameras are now 8 megapixels or higher.
Salesmen and adverts may try to convince you otherwise, but unless you’re planning on printing your pictures at poster size, anything over 6 megapixels is plenty.
Shutter lag is the bugbear of consumer digital.
You basically have a choice of two kinds of digicam, the consumer grade which relies on contrast-detecting autofocus and has dreadful shutter-lag problems which make it unsuitable for any kind of action photography, or the pro SLR which uses more reliable focusing methods and will actually fire when commanded-to. Drawback is that the SLR is not only costly but too bulky for leisure use.
If someone would make a compact cam with proper manual focus (and hence no shutter-lag) I'd buy it, unfortunately in the gimmick-led consumer sector I don't see that happening.
By Anteaus on 27 Aug 2009 
advertisement
- Q&A: Why Conficker was a victim of its own success
- App developers losing faith in Android
- Biz Stone: Murdoch's Google veto will "fail fast"
- Google adds automatic captions to YouTube
- China ramps up cyber spying
- Mozilla maintains dependence on Google
- Windows 7 flying off the shelves
- Google Chrome OS: full details unveiled
- AOL slashes 2,500 jobs
- YouTube begins streaming full-length shows
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Microsoft Word 2010 screenshots: Text Effects
- Microsoft Word 2010: inserting screenshots
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


