Smile
Posted on 9 Apr 2008 at 15:30
<a href="http://www.smile.co.uk" target="_self">www.smile.co.uk</a>
<strong>Rating:</strong> 2/6
There isn't a great deal to smile about with the security setup for Co-op's online-only bank. Login requires you to enter your sort code and account number - two details that are easily lifted from your bank card. You also have to provide the answer to one of several "personal questions", such as the name of the schools you attended, and your mother's maiden name - all easy fodder for ID thieves on social-networking sites.
The only salvation is the entry of two random digits from a four-digit security code, instead of a password. This is done with drop-down boxes, rather than the keyboard, to help avoid the gaze of malicious keyloggers. Nevertheless, we'd like to see more than one in four of Smile's login fields offer a degree of security. At least Smile offers to repay any money lost through computer crime that wasn't stopped by its security systems, so there is a safety net should anything go wrong.
Once logged in, the service has few bells and whistles, but all of the important features are present and are simple to use. This is important because Smile is an internet-only bank, so there are no branches to sort out unexpected problems. Telephone support is provided, though, and we've always been satisfied with the results.
Multiple accounts can be managed from one screen and most services are available within a few clicks - new accounts can be opened with a simple wizard, and new cards ordered with the press of a button.
Statements are also clear and easy to read, but unfortunately can't be exported for use in any of the popular financial software packages. Statements can't even be converted into humble CSV files, leaving print-outs as the only viable archiving option.
The site is lightweight and always responsive, with pages loading quickly and reliably- which is reassuring when you're sending money transfers or changing direct debits.
But Smile's efficiency can't mask the fact that its service is among the most basic here. Best avoided unless speed is your prime concern.
advertisement
- Q&A: Why Conficker was a victim of its own success
- App developers losing faith in Android
- Biz Stone: Murdoch's Google veto will "fail fast"
- Google adds automatic captions to YouTube
- China ramps up cyber spying
- Mozilla maintains dependence on Google
- Windows 7 flying off the shelves
- Google Chrome OS: full details unveiled
- AOL slashes 2,500 jobs
- YouTube begins streaming full-length shows
- Why Britain's watchdogs have fewer teeth than goldfish
- Tabbed documents: how to make Office 2010 great
- Outlook 2010 People Pane – does it spell death to Xobni
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots
- Co-Authoring in Word 2010 and SharePoint Foundation 2010
- Microsoft Outlook 2010 screenshots: Backstage view
- Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device
- Microsoft Office 2010 screenshots: Recover unsaved items
- Microsoft Word 2010 screenshots: Text Effects
- Microsoft Word 2010: inserting screenshots
- Getting to grips with Microsoft's IT Health Environment Scanner
- Virtualise your servers
- The changing face of travel gadgets
- Build your own distributed file system
- The bulletproof Dell that costs an arm and a leg
- Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview: Q&A
- Lawnmowers, the TyTN II and one odd insurance request
- There'll never be a bulletproof OS
- How far can we trust apps?
- Five nice touches in Outlook 2010
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk


