Norton Internet Security 2009 review
in Software
Verdict
Lighter than ever, but its all-round performance isn't quite first class.
Review Date: 13 Feb 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £43 (£49 inc VAT)
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
Norton Internet Security 2009 impressed us when it first appeared in September. It's the lightest Norton suite yet, and its resource demands compare favourably to the competition - although in this month's tests Eset and Kaspersky managed to slightly undercut its RAM requirements.
In our earlier look at the package we were also impressed to see Norton achieve malware detection rates comparable with those of Kaspersky, then our A-List choice. With 86% in this month's test, Norton still came within 2% of its Russian rival. Sadly, in this company such scores fall short of the winners' podium.
When it came to web threats, Norton dropped further behind, flagging up only 34% of our malicious sites. Its defence against our network attacks wasn't this month's most convincing, either: like McAfee, it left three TCP ports open along with a few other high-risk vulnerabilities.
It's a shame, because Norton Internet Security 2009 has obviously been designed with excellent intentions. Not only is it lightweight, it's also one of this month's least obtrusive suites, warning you of malware detections with a small, self-closing pop-up in the bottom-right of the screen. It doesn't visibly modify your email client, either.
Unfortunately, this well-meaning reticence can be frustrating for technical users. Requesters can be vague about which virus was found or where, and the juicy details are buried behind an overcomplicated interface. All the same, NIS 2009 is a very welcome advance over previous Norton products.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
From around the web
advertisement
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Speed-hungry customers push Virgin into profit
- Ofcom to impose price cuts on BT line rental
- Virgin hikes prices after "free" upgrade
- BT to offer 300Mbits/sec fibre "on demand"
- Ofcom outlines plans for wider 4G coverage
- Virgin upgrade to double broadband speeds
- Satellite broadband "being ignored"
- Sky blocks Newzbin over copyright claim
- Push to get more people online stalls
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The mobile data rip-off
- The end of the net as we know it
- Putting the squeeze on the broadband copper robbers
- The mobile broadband con
- When will you get superfast broadband?
- Who's going to pay for the internet?
- Broadband: Fixed vs Mobile
- Mobile broadband - the verdict
- 21CN: the 21st century nightmare?
- Double your broadband for free
advertisement






