Virtualise your servers
Posted on 19 Nov 2009 at 11:29
Jon Honeyball walks through the three steps to virtualising servers
Don’t muck around in between – you’ll end up doing the sums, the reality won’t match your guesstimate and you’ll need a lightly boiled Aspirin to get rid of the headache. And remember that the bottom line is that one well-specified, brand-new 1U rack server can easily replace four existing servers, maybe more depending on the loads.
For disk space, make sure you add up all the local storage needs for each existing server and then add some more on top for wiggle room. Remember that your new server will need to have properly resilient storage technology, such as a full mirror and so on – don’t skimp on this because you’re putting lots of eggs into one basket. Go for belt and braces, and remember that you’ll get many years of work out of this solution.
Finally, you need to choose your virtualisation tools. There are many contenders on the market, but I think the choice boils down to either Microsoft’s Hyper-V or VMware’s ESX4. There may be good reasons why you should use some other product, but be absolutely certain those reasons are good before you stray away from the two biggest players in the market.Finally, you need to choose your virtualisation tools. I think the choice boils down to either Microsoft’s Hyper-V or VMware’s ESX4
You’ll need to cost up the necessary tools and services to move to the platform you need. Both vendors offer a free hypervisor, but that isn’t sufficient to create a working business solution.
Microsoft offers System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM) 2008 Workgroup Edition for $505 (£307) as a package, which can manage five physical servers (Microsoft UK could only refer me to a US prices page).
VMware vSphere 4 Essentials costs $995 (£604) as a package and provides for three physical servers with up to two processors in each. Both vendors have more comprehensive and more powerful solutions, and none of them costs silly money if you consider the impact they’ll have on your business.
Choosing between the two firms has become almost a religious issue. Do you want your line-of-business servers to be managed by the same tool that manages your server infrastructure? If so, SCVMM is the way to go.
If you want to isolate hardware from OS and operations, then VMware is the way to go. At present, I favour the gospel according to VMware.
By this point you’ll have a shiny new server, hypervisor and management tools, and the next task is to shift your existing servers across onto the virtualised platform.
I’ll walk you through that in depth during my next column.
Download a year of Jon Honeyball's Advanced Windows columns by heading to our Free Downloads site
From around the web
Lookeen for your enterprise
We use in our office Lookeen.
As Lookeen can be installed on every workplace of your enterprise, your IT department will need to have an automated installation with pre-configured customizing in order to keep administration efforts and time at a minimum level.
Though integrated in Microsoft Outlook 2003, 2007 and 2010 Lookeen can be distributed and administrated centrally. The add-in technology make it possible! You may even want to use you own existing central software distribution instance for the installation or the sync of Lookeen on the single workplaces.
www.lookeen.net
By JudginD on 29 Nov 2009 ![]()
Good article
Good article Jon. This is a great way of introducing virtualisation to those still sitting on the fence.
No no expert in the virtualisation field but have just started to implement it using the brilliant Dell R610. I am astounded by its performance and the performance of the virtual servers.
I investigated ESX and Hyper-V and although I originally wanted the VMWare solution because it appeared to be the solution everyone else went for, I was persuded by a colleague to look deeper at Hyper-V. Thats when I recognised it's more suited to our environment.
My only advise is for those moving to the virtual server world is to look at what solution works for their organisation over and above what opinions are thrown at them from other people who made their bed.
By metalmonkey on 5 Dec 2009 ![]()
Jon Honeyball
Jon is one of the UK's most respected IT journalists and a contributing editor to PC Pro since it launched in 1994. He specialises in Microsoft technologies, including client/server and office automation applications.
advertisement
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
advertisement

