Virtualise your servers
Posted on 19 Nov 2009 at 11:29
Jon Honeyball walks through the three steps to virtualising servers
All of these are excellent reasons for virtualising, but you need to know which one is for you. Once you know that, you can choose your destination host hardware platform.
If you have a rack (or a desktop box) filled with skipware then it’s a good idea to put some more modern hardware in place. I’d go for the latest hardware available from the vendor of your choice, as the price/performance ratio is always best on new hardware, as is the computing load per unit of power, noise and heat output.
It might feel like a good idea to press some redundant older hardware into service, but I’d advise against this. Spend the money on modern boxes.
The next question is “how many boxes do we need?”, and there are several different views on this. If your current servers are heavily loaded then you can probably go for a 4:1 ratio, squeezing four physical servers down onto a single virtualising host box.
If your existing servers are only lightly loaded then that compression ratio could be considerably higher – I’ve seen 16:1 in a real-world deployment. I’ll admit that the 16 old servers taken out were low-performance items doing a set of relatively lightweight tasks, because their previous IT managers had followed a rather indulgent strategy of “a new server for each new task” on their network.It might feel like a good idea to press some redundant older hardware into service, but I’d advise against this. Spend the money on modern boxes
The result was a huge pile of tin, little of which was doing any real work. You’ll need to do a realistic evaluation of the loadings on your existing server hardware, and then make a guesstimate for the new boxes.
Of course, this is where experimentation can prove valuable – move some of the old machines over and do a trial setup.
Whatever configuration you end up with, there’s no such thing as too much RAM – it’s far more important than CPU power and even disk space where virtualisation is concerned. I’d rather have a box with two quad-core processors running at 2GHz than one quad-core running faster for the same money.
You also need to work out the real-world memory requirements for your servers and come to a view based on how many virtualised loads will be running on each box. But be realistic by starting from 16GB of RAM for each server (and think about going to 32GB).
Download a year of Jon Honeyball's Advanced Windows columns by heading to our Free Downloads site
From around the web
Lookeen for your enterprise
We use in our office Lookeen.
As Lookeen can be installed on every workplace of your enterprise, your IT department will need to have an automated installation with pre-configured customizing in order to keep administration efforts and time at a minimum level.
Though integrated in Microsoft Outlook 2003, 2007 and 2010 Lookeen can be distributed and administrated centrally. The add-in technology make it possible! You may even want to use you own existing central software distribution instance for the installation or the sync of Lookeen on the single workplaces.
www.lookeen.net
By JudginD on 29 Nov 2009 ![]()
Good article
Good article Jon. This is a great way of introducing virtualisation to those still sitting on the fence.
No no expert in the virtualisation field but have just started to implement it using the brilliant Dell R610. I am astounded by its performance and the performance of the virtual servers.
I investigated ESX and Hyper-V and although I originally wanted the VMWare solution because it appeared to be the solution everyone else went for, I was persuded by a colleague to look deeper at Hyper-V. Thats when I recognised it's more suited to our environment.
My only advise is for those moving to the virtual server world is to look at what solution works for their organisation over and above what opinions are thrown at them from other people who made their bed.
By metalmonkey on 5 Dec 2009 ![]()
Jon Honeyball
Jon is one of the UK's most respected IT journalists and a contributing editor to PC Pro since it launched in 1994. He specialises in Microsoft technologies, including client/server and office automation applications.
advertisement
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
advertisement

