<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; Windows Explorer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/windows-explorer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why all the fuss over Windows Explorer?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/09/mac-finder-is-better-than-windows-explorer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/09/mac-finder-is-better-than-windows-explorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brennan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=9775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Finder on the Mac seems much maligned by many Windows users and I have to admit I&#8217;m not sure why. Since using Windows 7 I&#8217;ve found the methods of storing and finding files much the same. The finder and explorer windows look strikingly similar and can be viewed in much the same way.
After using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The Finder on the Mac seems much maligned by many Windows users and I have to admit I&#8217;m not sure why. Since using Windows 7 I&#8217;ve found the methods of storing and finding files much the same. The finder and explorer windows look strikingly similar and can be viewed in much the same way.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">After using the windows explorer I&#8217;m not really convinced it&#8217;s necessarily better than the finder, but as I&#8217;ve already said that may well be because I&#8217;m more used to the Mac way of doing things. I have to admit that the smart folders of OSX are a much better solution than libraries in Windows 7. Unless I&#8217;m missing something (and there&#8217;s a rather large chance I am) they&#8217;re not as flexible. I have a smart folder on my Mac desktop that has all the .jpg files I&#8217;ve opened in the last month and one that has all the PDF files with Invoice in the name that are created between April 2009 and 10. As far as I can tell I can&#8217;t have a library that does the same. If I&#8217;m wrong I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll point it out in the comments.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">The search box in windows explorer seems much slower than the results provided by the search box in the start menu, which doesn&#8217;t seem right. For instance, if I go to the start menu and type editor@pcpro I get all the most recent emails I&#8217;ve sent to Tim and documents that contain that address almost instantaneously, If I do the same with the search box in windows explorer the search takes much longer. The two search boxes should surely be equal surely?</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">There are some elements of Windows 7 that really don&#8217;t make any sense to me at all. The control panel window, in my setup at least, has 51 separate entries. A couple of those are for installations I&#8217;ve performed: QuickTime and MobileMe. However, that still makes for a window that has 49 items. Obviously, Microsoft has thought about this and come up with the category view, but  I&#8217;m not sure it truly makes things clearer for the user. There&#8217;s inconsistency too, when you click any of the control panel items &#8211; some open a new window, some take you forward like a browser would and finally some take you to a different style of window altogether. I also received a number of &#8216;The page failed to load&#8217; errors when clicking the various control panels. This, I&#8217;m going to guess isn&#8217;t indicative of normal service, but it hasn&#8217;t made my experience in this area a particularly positive one.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden;">I&#8217;d be the first to say that my problems with explorer are mostly trivial rather than serious concerns, but the deeper I go into the Windows system the more I find that feels odd to me. Perhaps, I&#8217;ve become so ingrained to the Mac way of doing things that I&#8217;ve grown accustomed to the inconsistencies of that OS, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that Windows 7 doesn&#8217;t have it&#8217;s share of weird and not so wonderful design flaws.</div>
<p><em>In the latest part of our bid to convert a Mac user to Windows 7, Chris Brennan compares Finder to Explorer and wonders what all the fuss is about</em></p>
<p><em><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-9781" title="Windows Explorer" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Explorer.jpg" alt="Windows Explorer" width="462" height="347" /></em></p>
<p>The Finder on the Mac seems much maligned by many Windows users and I have to admit I&#8217;m not sure why. Since using Windows 7 I&#8217;ve found the methods of storing and finding files much the same. The Finder and Explorer windows look strikingly similar and can be viewed in much the same way.</p>
<p>After using the Windows Explorer I&#8217;m not really convinced it&#8217;s necessarily better than the Finder, but as I&#8217;ve already said that may well be because I&#8217;m more used to the Mac way of doing things. I have to admit that the smart folders of OSX are a much better solution than libraries in Windows 7. Unless I&#8217;m missing something (and there&#8217;s a rather large chance I am) they&#8217;re not as flexible.</p>
<p><span id="more-9775"></span></p>
<p>I have a smart folder on my Mac desktop that has all the .jpg files I&#8217;ve opened in the last month and one that has all the PDF files with Invoice in the name that are created between April 2009 and 2010. As far as I can tell I can&#8217;t have a library that does the same. If I&#8217;m wrong I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll point it out in the comments.</p>
<p>The search box in Windows Explorer also seems much slower than the results provided by the search box in the Start Menu, which doesn&#8217;t seem right. For instance, if I go to the Start Menu and type editor@pcpro I get all the most recent emails I&#8217;ve sent to Tim and documents that contain that address almost instantaneously, If I do the same with the search box in Windows Explorer the search takes much longer. The two search boxes should surely be equal surely?</p>
<p>There are some elements of Windows 7 that really don&#8217;t make any sense to me at all. The control panel window in my setup at least, has 51 separate entries. A couple of those are for installations I&#8217;ve performed: QuickTime and MobileMe. However, that still makes for a window that has 49 items.</p>
<p>Obviously, Microsoft has thought about this and come up with the category view, but  I&#8217;m not sure it truly makes things clearer for the user. There&#8217;s inconsistency too, when you click any of the control panel items &#8211; some open a new window, some take you forward like a browser would and finally some take you to a different style of window altogether.</p>
<p>I also received a number of &#8216;The page failed to load&#8217; errors when clicking the various control panels. This, I&#8217;m going to guess isn&#8217;t indicative of normal service, but it hasn&#8217;t made my experience in this area a particularly positive one.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be the first to say that my problems with Explorer are mostly trivial rather than serious concerns, but the deeper I go into the Windows system the more I find that feels odd to me. Perhaps, I&#8217;ve become so ingrained to the Mac way of doing things that I&#8217;ve grown accustomed to the inconsistencies of that OS, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that Windows 7 doesn&#8217;t have its share of weird and not so wonderful design flaws.</p>
<p><a title="Chris Brennan blog " href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/author/cbrennan/" target="_self"><strong><strong>Click here to read the rest of Chris Brennan’s blog on converting from Mac to Windows 7</strong></strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/09/mac-finder-is-better-than-windows-explorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

