<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is it right to censor Wikipedia to save a life?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/29/is-it-right-to-censor-wikipedia-to-save-a-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/29/is-it-right-to-censor-wikipedia-to-save-a-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sparkes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Rhode is a double Pulitzer-winning journalist with the New York Times who just escaped seven months as a captive of the Taliban &#8211; yet you won&#8217;t have heard about it.
It&#8217;s extremely newsworthy, but coverage of the kidnapping would have made Rhode a more valuable hostage. The higher profile the captive, the more attention the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/29/is-it-right-to-censor-wikipedia-to-save-a-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The people vs Wolfram Alpha</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/18/the-people-vs-wolfram-alpha/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/18/the-people-vs-wolfram-alpha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolfram Alpha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Since Wolfram Alpha launched at the weekend, I&#8217;ve lost count of the number of articles I&#8217;ve read in which the author asks it inane questions and laughs when it falls flat. Even our own Darien Graham-Smith (along with several others in the office) seems almost delighted to prod and poke at it to find instances [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/05/18/the-people-vs-wolfram-alpha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia: the defence</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/04/08/wikipedia-the-defence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/04/08/wikipedia-the-defence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Turton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kamm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading Oliver Kamm&#8217;s critique of Wikipedia on the First Post was an eye-opening experience. It was the first time I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading something that so completely failed to grasp the subject under discussion. Take the following paragraph, for example.
&#8220;Whereas science and learning pursue truth, Wikipedia prizes consensus. Wikipedia has no means of arbitrating between different [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/04/08/wikipedia-the-defence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The invisible Internet pioneer</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/19/the-invisible-internet-pioneer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/19/the-invisible-internet-pioneer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul otlet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A museum has opened in Mons, Belgium, with an exhibit to internet pioneer Paul Otlet.
No, I haven&#8217;t heard of him, either.
Although, after reading about him, he seems like one of the most brilliant minds of the past 100 years &#8211; and one of the nuttiest.
In short, he proposed the Internet as we know it &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/19/the-invisible-internet-pioneer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It may look cool &#8211; but what&#8217;s the point?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/18/it-may-look-cool-but-whats-the-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/18/it-may-look-cool-but-whats-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve stumbled upon Chris Harrison&#8217;s superb WikiViz project and, while it&#8217;s undoubtedly a brilliant thing, there&#8217;s some debate in the office: what&#8217;s it actually for?

It caught my eye thanks to the odd, yet fantastic concept &#8211; a visual representation of Wikipedia. The result is an truly gigantic image which has to be divided into 64 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/18/it-may-look-cool-but-whats-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
