<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; TwitScoop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/twitscoop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>20 good and 20 bad things about Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/05/20-good-and-20-bad-things-about-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/05/20-good-and-20-bad-things-about-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Gorman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TweetDeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TwitScoop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
PC Pro’s great Twitter adventure is barely a fortnight old (sign up for our Twitter feed here) but already we’ve found a great number of things that both amaze and annoy us about the micro-blogging site. 
Here, in no particular order, are things we like, and can’t stand, about Twitter. Ideas suggested by others on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB"><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/twitter-bird.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5258" title="twitter-bird" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/twitter-bird.jpg" alt="Twitter bird" width="170" height="148" /></a>PC Pro’s great Twitter adventure is barely a fortnight old (<a title="Twitter: PC Pro" href="http://twitter.com/pc_pro" target="_blank"><strong>sign up for our Twitter feed here</strong></a>) but already we’ve found a great number of things that both amaze and annoy us about the micro-blogging site. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Here, in no particular order, are things we like, and can’t stand, about Twitter. Ideas suggested by others on the PC Pro Twitter feed and elsewhere are duly credited in brackets.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span id="more-5257"></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>GOOD THINGS</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">1. Simplicity. You sign up, start Tweeting, and the ball&#8217;s rolling within minutes. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. It&#8217;s a brilliant way of breaking news. &#8220;It&#8217;s almost like the old Telex machines&#8221; says senior news reporter, Stu, who&#8217;s barely old enough to remember them.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. It&#8217;s good for getting other people to write your presentation for you (<a title="DarienGS" href="http://twitter.com/DarienGS" target="_blank"><strong>DarienGS</strong></a>)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">4. Celebrities talk like &#8220;real&#8221; people without agents/producers/editors getting in the way. And the best Tweeting stars actually interact with their audience. <a title="Twitter Dave Gorman " href="http://twitter.com/Dave_Gorman" target="_blank"><strong>Dave Gorman</strong></a> being a prime example. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">5. Immediacy. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">6. 140-character limit makes you think more about what you&#8217;re saying (<a title="Twitter: Montemplar" href="http://twitter.com/montemplar" target="_blank"><strong>montemplar</strong></a>)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">7. Anyone can do it.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">8. Twitter allows people to fire-off inane day-to-day stuff that (hopefully) keeps other channels of communication (email, SMS, blogs) tidier.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">9. Variety of ways to access: PC, mobile, multiple apps and widgets. (<a title="Twitter: Montemplar" href="http://twitter.com/montemplar" target="_blank"><strong>montemplar</strong></a>)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">10. You can stamp personality and bespoke design on profile pages, yet they retain a simple, consistent structure.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">11. Trend spotting. Services such as <a title="TwitScoop" href="http://www.twitscoop.com/" target="_blank"><strong>TwitScoop</strong></a> make it easy to spot what&#8217;s going on right now. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">12. It&#8217;s free.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">13. In a world of Flash, Java, Ajax and other attention-hogging wibbles, it&#8217;s refreshingly clean.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">14. The API &#8211; inspired decision to distribute freely has created a million and one different apps, widgets and plug-ins. <a title="TweetDeck" href="http://www.tweetdeck.com/beta/" target="_blank"><strong>TweetDeck</strong></a> being our current favourite. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">15. No need for niceities. You cut straight to the point.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">16. We&#8217;re irrationally pleased when someone we like/respect starts following us.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">17. We know what our readers think of us, thanks to TweetDeck search.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">18. You&#8217;re not constantly bombarded with ads, as with other free services. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">19. That said, it&#8217;s an amazingly powerful, well-targeted sales channel. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">20. The man who founded it is called Biz Stone.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>BAD THINGS</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">1. It panders to our short attention spans.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">2. Anyone can do it.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">3. 140 chr limit makes us all spk like teenagers. FFS. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">4. It quickly becomes an unmanagable flood.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">5. It&#8217;s another bloody thing to keep up-to-date.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">6. Presentation. The site looks like your dad built it, in between putting up shelves and the rugby.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">7. The number of companies that suddenly start following you after you mention their products. (<a title="Twitter arsingphase" href="http://twitter.com/parsingphase" target="_blank"><strong>parsingphase</strong></a>)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">7. Reliability. It&#8217;s up and down like Amy Winehouse.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">8. Media bandwagon. Sky bloody News has now got a Twitter Correspondent. Hell&#8217;s teeth.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">9. Fake celeb profiles. Yawn.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">10. It&#8217;s not (yet) sustainable. Trillions of users, no clear way to make money from them.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">11. It&#8217;s hard to maintain a professional image.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">12. It&#8217;s horribly addictive. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">13. Conversations are desperately difficult to follow. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">14. Spambots.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">15. We can&#8217;t ignore it. Like a sullen puppy, it craves attention.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">16. We know what our readers <em>really </em>think of us thanks to TweetDeck search.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">17. Someone beat us to pcpro. Grrr.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">18. We&#8217;re still not sure what the point of it really is.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">19. Jargon. RT. Hashtags. Just what the world needed. More things that need explaining. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">20. &#8220;New Media&#8221; consultants are being paid thousands of pounds per hour to bandy about terms like Twitterverse to gormless corporate morons who are desperate to go Web 2.0. Someone pass the shovel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/05/20-good-and-20-bad-things-about-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

