<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; Snow Leopard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/snow-leopard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mac OS X 10.6: a quick look at Snow Leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/01/mac-os-x-106-a-quick-look-at-snow-leopard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/01/mac-os-x-106-a-quick-look-at-snow-leopard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Brock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow Leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It wasn&#8217;t mentioned on the 10 o&#8217;clock news. It barely got a mention in the newspapers. Many non-Apple interest web sites didn&#8217;t mention it. When I went to the flagship Apple Store in Regents Street on Friday lunch time, there weren&#8217;t queues round the block (though there were a few inside). It seems that Apple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-7024" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/screenshot_04-175x154.png" alt="" width="175" height="154" /></p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t mentioned on the 10 o&#8217;clock news. It barely got a mention in the newspapers. Many non-Apple interest web sites didn&#8217;t mention it. When I went to the flagship Apple Store in Regents Street on Friday lunch time, there weren&#8217;t queues round the block (though there were a few inside). It seems that Apple have managed to launch a new product without all the usual fuss.</p>
<p>However, I am sure that everyone who reads this article will know that Snow Leopard is the update to Mac OS X that was released last week. Obviously as a keen Mac user, I did go and buy it on the day it launched and I did install it on my MacBook over the weekend but was it worth the £25 I paid for it?</p>
<p><span id="more-7018"></span></p>
<p>Before answering that question, what did I get for my £25? Apart from a DVD in a box not much to mention. Having spent an hour watching it installing I did notice a number of differences. Firstly, the upgrade liberated 9GB of space on my hard drive. In these days of terabyte hard drives that is not much &#8211; but to me with a MacBook Air with an 80GB hard drive that doubled my free space. Secondly, it does do various things more quickly. I did not use a stopwatch to do &#8216;before&#8217; and &#8216;after&#8217; timings but I have noticed that many of the standard applications are more responsive and the machine is quicker to wake from sleep. The Time Machine backup system does seem to be a lot faster. Thirdly there are a number of places where the interface has been tidied up. A few of the displays are neater and present information in a better way.</p>
<p>Some fuss has been made of changes &#8216;under the bonnet&#8217;. The main change that will get people chattering is that Snow Leopard is a 64-bit operating system &#8211; kind of. On every Mac (except for an Xserve), Snow Leopard boots a 32-bit kernel which can run 32 and 64-bit applications. If you want to boot your Mac into 64-bit mode then you can hold down the 6 and 4 keys at boot time to see what happens. If you have any third party drivers that are not 64-bit compatible then you may have some problems. Apple have shipped all but three of the standard applications as 64-bit versions but you will have to wait for other vendors to catch up. There does seem to be some speed advantages in running 64-bit applications &#8211; it is <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5343443/snow-leopard-currently-restricts-64+bit-booting-to-newer-macs">claimed</a> that Safari is twice as fast in one benchmark &#8211; so may be some of the speed differences I have seen have come from 64-bit applications.</p>
<p>In terms of compatibility problems, I had one problem which was with the software for my Vodafone 3G dongle. Bizarrely I found the most recent software from Vodafone UK did not work but a <a href="http://software.a1.net/vmc/Dashboard/VMC_MAC_3.04.01.00.dmg">slightly older version</a> which was mentioned <a href="http://www.24100.net/2009/08/using-vodafone-mobile-connect-with-snow-leopard-10a432/">here</a> did work. One other application (<a href="http://cotvnc.sf.net">Chicken of the VNC</a>) seems slightly more fragile than usual but everything else is fine.</p>
<p>Other changes such as Exchange support and improved QuickTime have not affected me as I don&#8217;t use Exchange at work (we use Google Apps) and the only time I use the QuickTime application is when someone says it has changed and I have a look at it. As such, I had a look at it this time and it has changed.</p>
<p>Snow Leopard really is a stepping stone from Mac OS X 10.5 to 10.7. All the internal changes for a 64-bit system are to tell everyone that the next version is going to be 64-bit only. Certain new APIs are only available to 64-bit applications and Apple has said strongly to developers with this version that &#8216;we have done it and therefore you should&#8217;.</p>
<p>So was it worth £25? Yes &#8211; for me the speed improvements and the freeing up of disk space. In Windows terminology it is more than a Service Pack (which are free upgrades) and more like an &#8216;R2&#8242; release (like Windows Server 2003 R2) which are not free. For PC users, it is a bit of side show before the main event.</p>
<p><strong>Update: 4th September 2009</strong></p>
<p>I just thought I would add a quick update to this post. Firstly, I have had no problems with the upgrade over the last four days. There was other thing that did not work (the GPGMail plugin and the author has said <a href="http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=999042">he can&#8217;t fix it</a> which is a shame).</p>
<p>Secondly, thanks for the comments. I do agree with most of them as they agree with me! On disk space, it turns out that some disk space was reclaimed by leaving out old PowerPC code &#8212; Snow Leopard is Intel only. As for the printer drivers, it has not affected me and I don&#8217;t understand the policy of the printer manufacturers. A very old LaserJet 5 in my office is supported and by the sound of it, a relatively new Deskjet is not &#8212; though it might be with drivers from 10.5. On the other hand, it seems it can be cheaper to buy a new ink jet printer than cartridges for an old one!</p>
<p>Thirdly there was a lot of tweaks I did not mention and some of them do grow on you. It is also worthy of note that apart from the Microsoft Exchange improvements there are better links to <a href="http://googlemac.blogspot.com/2009/09/improved-contact-sync-in-snow-leopard.html">Google Apps</a> for Address Book and Calendars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/01/mac-os-x-106-a-quick-look-at-snow-leopard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

