<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why is Chrome so polished?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/09/why-is-chrome-so-polished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/09/why-is-chrome-so-polished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Turton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using Chrome for a few days now, and something&#8217;s been bugging me about it. Nothing immediately obvious, just a vague sense of something being not quite right. Then, as I was tromping into work this morning, munching on bacon sandwich, I finally put my finger on it. What&#8217;s bothering me, is that I can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chrome1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3192" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/chrome1.jpg" alt="" width="128" height="121" /></a>I&#8217;ve been using Chrome for a few days now, and something&#8217;s been bugging me about it. Nothing immediately obvious, just a vague sense of something being not quite right. Then, as I was tromping into work this morning, munching on bacon sandwich, I finally put my finger on it. What&#8217;s bothering me, is that I can&#8217;t believe Google made this.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, Google&#8217;s muddy size twelves are all over it. The simplistic interface, the lashings of space, and of course, the brilliant search. What&#8217;s been bothering me are the flourishes. The transparency when you drag a tab into a window, the fading task bar, the slide away tabs, the cute animations. Chrome is by far and away the prettiest browser doing the rounds, but pretty is not something I associate with Google -which to my mind has always been the most utilitarian company out there.</p>
<p><span id="more-3189"></span></p>
<p>Look at Google Apps and their &#8220;designed by a bricky&#8221; interface. It does the job, but nobody&#8217;s ever going to murmur sweet nothings in its ear over a nice white wine. Google Mail suffers the same syndrome. It&#8217;s undoubtedly a great laugh down the pub, but if my mates saw me with it I&#8217;d be slaughtered.</p>
<p>And suddenly here&#8217;s Chrome. It could, of course, just be a reaction to existing uggo browsers, a nice way of differentiating itself from its competitors. But a part of me thinks that while Google publicly denies it&#8217;s working to usurp the OS with the browser, this new focus on aesthetics suggests otherwise. Apps don&#8217;t particularly have to be beautiful, as long as they work. These days, however, operating systems do. It&#8217;s a selling point, and one embraced with gusto by Apple, Microsoft and, lately, Linux.</p>
<p>To my mind, Google is getting ready to quite litterally blue the line between browsers and operating systems. Either that, or its finally hired somebody with taste.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/09/why-is-chrome-so-polished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

