<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; Nvidia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/nvidia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:12:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nvidia responds: There&#8217;s cash in CUDA</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/01/nvidia-responds-to-my-cuda-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/01/nvidia-responds-to-my-cuda-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercomputing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Tamasi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some companies take a very laid back approach to the press. I could publicly allege that Itanium was a front for a money-laundering operation and I doubt I’d hear a peep of complaint from Intel.
Actually, that might explain a lot. But I digress.
The point is that Nvidia, unlike Intel, is acutely tuned in to what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/01/nvidia-responds-to-my-cuda-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reports of CUDA’s death exaggerated?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/reports-of-cuda%e2%80%99s-death-exaggerated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/reports-of-cuda%e2%80%99s-death-exaggerated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DirectX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DX11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPGPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In my last post I suggested that DirectX 11’s extensive GPGPU support could mark the end of the road for CUDA. And I do expect that mass market GPU applications will quickly move to DirectX rather than restricting themselves to a single architecture.
But the other day I was discussing DX11 with Bit-Tech editor Tim Smalley, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/reports-of-cuda%e2%80%99s-death-exaggerated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All eyes on Nvidia as GTC kicks off</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/all-eyes-on-nvidia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/all-eyes-on-nvidia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE4100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moorestown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tegra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After last week’s Intel Developer Forum, it’s now Nvidia’s turn. Later on today the company will open its three-day GPU Technology Conference in San Jose – a more formal affair than last year’s flashy “Nvision” expo, but still a high-profile international event, and one which yours truly is lucky enough to be attending.
(The picture, in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/all-eyes-on-nvidia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Ion netbooks: first look</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/15/nvidia-ion-netbooks-first-look/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/15/nvidia-ion-netbooks-first-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The first Ion-based netbooks are beginning to trickle in, so yesterday Nvidia took the opportunity to introduce the technology to us formally. And if there was any doubt as to the focus of the demo, it was quickly made clear by the presence of a gigantic 1080p Sharp Aquos TV with a tiny netbook attached.
The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/15/nvidia-ion-netbooks-first-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Nvidia PhysX ever be worthwhile?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Nvidia has talked up its PhysX system incessantly since it bought Ageia Technologies, creator of the engine, in February 2008, but it’s struggled to make a significant impact on the PC gaming landscape. So, despite the impressive tech demos and endless optimism, is PhysX looking more like a white elephant with every passing GPU [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hands on with Nvidia Tegra</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/19/hands-on-with-nvidia-tegra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/19/hands-on-with-nvidia-tegra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1080p]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tegra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Nvidia&#8217;s Tegra was first introduced in June 2008, touted as a &#8220;computer on a chip&#8221; that would saunter into numerous types of device &#8211; most notably MIDs – and beat Intel’s Atom at its own game. It&#8217;s been all quiet on the Tegra front since, but we&#8217;ve finally had the chance to go hands [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/19/hands-on-with-nvidia-tegra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First look: the Ion-powered Lenovo Ideapad S12</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/18/first-look-the-ion-powered-lenovo-ideapad-s12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/18/first-look-the-ion-powered-lenovo-ideapad-s12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IdeaPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nc10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nc20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Lenovo&#8217;s Ideapad S12 is one of the first netbooks we&#8217;ve seen to use Nvidia&#8217;s Ion platform, which can allegedly “turn a netbook into a notebook” thanks to its combination of Intel Atom CPU and Nvidia GeForce 9400M GPU. 
It&#8217;s a new part that&#8217;s only been used by Acer up until now, in its netbooks [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/18/first-look-the-ion-powered-lenovo-ideapad-s12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All the week&#8217;s reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/09/all-the-weeks-reviews-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/09/all-the-weeks-reviews-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chillblast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cowon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logitech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thecus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christmas came and went, New Year flew past with a bang but PC Pro&#8217;s reviews kept on coming. We&#8217;ve much catching up to do with this week&#8217;s round-up, so we&#8217;ll keep the focus on the most notable of the twenty-plus reviews since the festive period.
New Year&#8217;s entertainment
We got unfeasibly possessive over a little media player [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/09/all-the-weeks-reviews-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Nvidia halt its current decline?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/17/can-nvidia-halt-its-current-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/17/can-nvidia-halt-its-current-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[View from the Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This month in the Labs we&#8217;ve mostly been testing graphics cards, and you&#8217;ll be able to read the results when the next issue of Pro is published in January. But I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m giving too much away by revealing it&#8217;s not particularly happy reading for Nvidia.
Put simply, Nvidia&#8217;s desktop department is having a torrid [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/12/17/can-nvidia-halt-its-current-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia keeps failing the name game</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/26/does-david-bayon-gts-beat-tim-danton-gt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/26/does-david-bayon-gts-beat-tim-danton-gt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[View from the Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At present it&#8217;s nothing more than an industry rumour, but it&#8217;s one that can&#8217;t come true soon enough. Nvidia is reportedly about to rebrand its graphics cards in a quest for much-needed simplicity.
Gone will be the 8000 and 9000 number schemes, with things going back to (kind of) the beginning. So we&#8217;ll see 100s and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/26/does-david-bayon-gts-beat-tim-danton-gt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
