<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; media hard disk players</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/media-hard-disk-players/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The ten worst products of 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/12/30/the-ten-worst-products-of-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/12/30/the-ten-worst-products-of-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Danton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop PCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBook readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media hard disk players]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/12/31/the-ten-worst-products-of-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve seen some absolutely brilliant kit this year. Stand-outs include the obvious (think the Apple iPad) and the less obvious (why hello there, Sony VAIO Z13), but this blog is to celebrate the rubbish. The stuff that, with any luck, may already have been pulled off the shelves due to its sheer stupidity.
In a very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve seen some absolutely brilliant kit this year. Stand-outs include the obvious (think the <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/laptops/357064/apple-ipad">Apple iPad</a>) and the less obvious (why hello there, <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/laptops/362017/sony-vaio-z13">Sony VAIO Z13</a>), but this blog is to celebrate the rubbish. The stuff that, with any luck, may already have been pulled off the shelves due to its sheer stupidity.</p>
<p>In a very particular order, here goes:</p>
<p><span id="more-30457"></span></p>
<h1>10. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/smartphones/358588/htc-smart" target="_blank">HTC Smart</a></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/smartphones/358588/htc-smart/2"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="image" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image.png" border="0" alt="image" width="464" height="348" /></a> Oh the irony of HTC’s naming schemes. HTC was attempting to be clever, to release what we described as “a poor man’s smartphone”, but it got everything wrong.</p>
<p>Wrong OS: Brew MP was designed not by a world-renowned software developer but by Qualcomm, a chipset maker, and boy it showed. Wrong price: £25 per month on a 24-month contract? Hello? Wrong sync options: jump through hoops and get nowhere. Thankfully, the <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/smartphones/359641/htc-wildfire">HTC Wildfire</a> came along and saved HTC’s cheap phone blushes.</p>
<h1>9. Super Talent MasterDrive GL 16GB</h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/SSD_SuperTalent_1.jpg"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="SSD_SuperTalent_1" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/SSD_SuperTalent_1_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="SSD_SuperTalent_1" width="464" height="348" /></a> This product was so appalling we never actually put the review up on the website: only readers of issue 188 could savour its one-star review. A low price of £71 inc VAT might mean “it’s tempting to give the MasterDrive a whirl,” we wrote. “If you do, you’ll regret it. It came last or second to last in eight of our ten tests.” When we used it as a boot drive, freezes “were a frequent, unpredictable occurrence”. One to avoid folks.</p>
<h1>8. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/354238/norton-utilities">Norton Utilities</a></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image1.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="image" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image_thumb.png" border="0" alt="image" width="464" height="348" /></a></p>
<p>I’ll admit some bias: we’ve never been big fans of utility suites at <em>PC Pro</em>. If we had collective eyebrows, we’d raise them whenever a new one appeared on our desk. Although we have more than one desk and, between us, many eyebrows, so perhaps it’s best to leave that metaphor at this point.</p>
<p>There are some good ones (utility suites, that is, not metaphors). We were pleasantly surprised by <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/software/363463/tuneup-utilities-2011">TuneUp Utilities 2011</a> earlier this month, for instance. How disappointing, then, that Norton Utilities failed to deliver when we reviewed it at the tail-end of 2009; it went on sale “proper” in 2010, which is why it squeezes into this list.</p>
<p>A one-click “Optimize” button is probably the highlight, and it did knock off three seconds from our boot-up time – but in doing so dropped our available memory by 113MB. There are many better ways to spend £39.</p>
<h1>7. iPad made simple</h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ipadmadesimple.jpg"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="ipad made simple" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ipadmadesimple_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="ipad made simple" width="464" height="350" /></a> In June, Apress released a 704-page book called “iPad made simple”. Let me repeat that: a book containing 704 pages of advice on how to use a device that’s universally acknowledged as being ridiculously easy to use.</p>
<p>Even accounting for the fact that <em>PC Pro</em> readers aren’t its target audience, it beggars belief that anyone would resort to a book costing more than £16 rather than just experimenting with the darn thing or picking up a much cheaper, briefer guide.</p>
<h1>6. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/ebook-readers/362911/bebook-club">BeBook Club</a></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image2.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="image" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image_thumb1.png" border="0" alt="image" width="464" height="348" /></a> So it’s November 2010. Amazon has hit the headlines for all the right reasons by releasing a bargain <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/ebook-readers/361360/amazon-kindle">Kindle</a> for £109, complete with seamless integration with Amazon’s bookstore. What does BeBook do? It releases a <em>more expensive </em>eReader – £149 to be exact – that doesn’t beat the Kindle on any major features, doesn’t integrate with any eBook stores, and doesn’t even have Wi-Fi for direct downloads from the internet.</p>
<p>To add insult to injury, it uses inferior screen technology so text looks worse! We like many of BeBook’s products, but this one goes straight into the remainders bin.</p>
<h1>5. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/media-players/361834/energy-sistem-7502">Energy Sistem 7502</a></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image3.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="image" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image_thumb2.png" border="0" alt="image" width="464" height="387" /></a> What makes the Energy Sistem 7502 so disappointing, apart from its appalling name, is that we had such high hopes for it. This media player promised so much that the <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/media-players/361099/apple-ipod-touch-4th-gen-32gb">iPod touch</a> can’t deliver, with the highlight being Digital TV playback. Sadly, it was rubbish.</p>
<p>“The EPG… is woeful,” wrote our reviewer. “While you can select channels and see the next week’s programmes, there’s no way to access programme information or actually watch shows being broadcast from within the EPG. Instead, you need to exit the EPG, open up the TV section, navigate to the channel and tune back in.”</p>
<p>Add a sluggish interface and only 2GB of storage, and another great idea was consigned to the garbage heap of dashed hopes.</p>
<h1>4. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/graphics-cards/355846/ati-radeon-hd-5830">ATI Radeon HD 5830</a></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image4.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="image" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image_thumb3.png" border="0" alt="image" width="464" height="348" /></a></p>
<p>ATI – strictly speaking, we should now say AMD, but we won’t because life’s confusing enough already – had more hits than misses in 2010, but the HD 5830 falls decisively into the latter category. It was ATI’s attempt to offer top-end performance for an affordable price, although by affordable we’re still talking £200. Why, we kept asking, would anyone pay that much when around £20 more could get them the faster <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/graphics-cards/352447/ati-radeon-hd-5850">HD 5850</a>?</p>
<p>With wide gaps in performance in more demanding tasks, the answer was a great big no-one. All the HD 5830 did was create more confusion for potential buyers and eke a bit more life out of the ageing Cypress core that powered 2009’s <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/graphics-cards/351784/ati-radeon-hd-5870">ATI Radeon HD 5870</a> to A List success. We don’t know who’s more cynical, ATI or us.</p>
<h1>3. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/desktops/358900/apple-mac-mini">Apple Mac mini</a></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image5.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="image" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image_thumb4.png" border="0" alt="image" width="464" height="348" /></a></p>
<p>Grerrk. That sound? That’s me girding myself up for the mound of criticism about to come my way for daring to list an Apple product as one of the worst of 2010.</p>
<p>In many ways, I agree, it’s unfair. The new Mac mini looks beautiful in its minimalist magnesium casing and includes some stunning design moves to make it so small. There’s an HDMI port, Gigabit Ethernet, four USB 2 connectors, FireWire 800, 802.11n Wi-Fi: in port terms, it’s well hung.</p>
<p>Delve inside, though, and it disappoints. A Core 2 processor released in 2008, stingy 320GB hard disk and 2GB of RAM. What killed it for us, though, was the price. The base model was expensive at £650, but if you want to upgrade to a larger hard disk or faster processor Apple was charging double or sometimes triple the “real” price difference. Great design, but what a rip-off.</p>
<h1>2. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/laptops/363799/dell-inspiron-duo">Dell Inspiron Duo</a></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image6.png"><img style="border-right-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px" title="image" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image_thumb5.png" border="0" alt="image" width="464" height="348" /></a> Oh Dell, you great big lovable ball of hardware goodness, how could you do this to us? We so wanted to love the Inspiron Duo, and at first glance it seems so fantastic, but in the end we were more let down than a student who voted Lib Dem.</p>
<p>The idea behind the Duo is great. A cheap netbook that converts, with one very sexy flip of the lid, into a tablet. We were so impressed we wrote, “the Duo’s transformation from notebook to tablet is almost balletic”. Meanwhile, the “rounded, rubberised edges practically beg to be touched, and the 1.36kg chassis oozes a solidity and class that belies the budget price [of £449]”.</p>
<p>The first sign of disappointment came from a battery life of less than four hours under light use. The kick in the teeth, though, became obvious once we’d used it in tablet mode for a while. Over to the review to explain why:</p>
<p>“Tap an icon and you’re unceremoniously shunted [from Dell’s finger-friendly DuoStage software] back to the Windows desktop as it labours into view. And while we’d have expected each application to form part of a slick unified user-interface, the reality is amateurish at best.</p>
<p>“The Internet icon simply launches Internet Explorer; the Games icon lazily shunts you back to the paltry selection of games included with Windows 7; and the Paint icon loads up CyberLink’s YouPaint software, which regularly moans that ‘The current screen resolution is not recommended for this application’.”</p>
<p>As we went on to say, “when a tablet leaves you longing to return to a keyboard and a touchpad, there’s clearly something wrong”.</p>
<h1>1. <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/smartphones/363019/next-7in-media-tablet">Next 7in media tablet</a></h1>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image7.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 5px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/image_thumb6.png" border="0" alt="image" width="464" height="348" /></a> Never mind worst product of the year, this is probably the worst product of the century. Normally when reviewing a product we can find something positive to say, but the highlight for the Next tablet was its eight-page Quick Start Guide.</p>
<p>Imagine, if you will, a product “designed” for surfing the web that makes the experience of web browsing so painfully slow you want to head butt a nearby wall.</p>
<p>Imagine an interface so unresponsive and poorly designed you have a better chance of reaching your intended destination by prodding randomly than trying to reason with it.</p>
<p>Imagine a portable device that won’t even last for two blinking hours away from the mains without collapsing in a sulky heap.</p>
<p>If you’ve imagined all that, then you’re very close to imagining the appalling Next 7in media tablet. If you got one for Christmas, don’t open it, just beg for the receipt. If that fails, head to your nearest Next, fall to your knees and beg for a pair of Argyll socks in exchange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/12/30/the-ten-worst-products-of-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Converted by media hard disks</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/14/converted-by-media-hard-disks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/14/converted-by-media-hard-disks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media hard disk players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[External media hard disks aren&#8217;t new, they&#8217;ve been around for some time and we&#8217;ve reviewed a few here and there, but I&#8217;ve always been in the &#8220;what&#8217;s the point&#8221; camp when it comes to these expensive little devices. Let me get it straight: it&#8217;s an external hard disk for video files and you want me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/plextor.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5004" title="Plextor" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/plextor-299x300.jpg" alt="Plextor" width="227" height="228" /></a>External media hard disks aren&#8217;t new, they&#8217;ve been around for some time and we&#8217;ve reviewed a few here and there, but I&#8217;ve always been in the &#8220;what&#8217;s the point&#8221; camp when it comes to these expensive little devices. Let me get it straight: it&#8217;s an external hard disk for video files and you want me to pay a premium because it has an archaic composite output on the back?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s taken a little while, but I&#8217;ve come to realise I&#8217;m approaching the topic with my <em>PC Pro</em> hat too firmly wedged onto my balding scalp. <span id="more-5003"></span>Recently my dear old father wanted to watch some .avi files I had on my PC, but wanted to do so on a proper TV in the comfort of his living room. A TV that&#8217;s (gasp!) not HD and far from au fait with modern digital inputs. Beneath that sits a DVD player completely unaware of the existence of .avi files, .mpegs or any other type of file that isn&#8217;t a properly authored DVD video.</p>
<p>We often get carried away with all the technology we see, and it&#8217;s sometimes good to take a step back and acknowledge the fact that my father&#8217;s living room is probably very much like those of a large proportion of the UK. HD is growing but has some way to go, while the old DVD players people bought when they first became affordable still work fine, so why upgrade them to newer, more advanced models? No, for better or worse, the majority of the population are not <em>PC Pro</em> readers.</p>
<p>Faced with the prospect of recoding the twelve hours or so of scattered video files into a format I could then spend my afternoon burning across multiple DVDs for him to work his way through, I really couldn&#8217;t be bothered. Sorry Dad.</p>
<p>But these media hard disks are perfect for the job &#8211; a job they&#8217;re very obviously aimed at but which we tech nerds often dismiss as neanderthal. The files go on; the media hard disk plugs into the SCART socket on the TV; they play without a hitch. My parents can set it up and work it; that tells me all I need to know.</p>
<p>With HD versions now becoming the norm, adding HDMI ports and digital audio outputs, I&#8217;m belatedly beginning to take these players more seriously as mainstream consumer devices. In light of this we&#8217;ll be gathering the latest and best models in the near future for a shootout on the pages of <em>PC Pro</em>. Dad, your copy will be in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/01/14/converted-by-media-hard-disks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

