<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; libel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/libel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Font smoothing: a not-so-sharp distinction</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/05/a-not-so-sharp-distinction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/05/a-not-so-sharp-distinction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m just road-testing Safari 4, and I’ve come across this interesting claim on the What’s New in Safari page:
&#8220;Safari now uses Windows standard fonts, but you can choose to use Apple’s crisp anti-aliased fonts if you prefer.&#8221;
Now, if you didn’t know any better, wouldn’t you take that to mean that Windows’ fonts aren’t anti-aliased? And [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m just road-testing Safari 4, and I’ve come across this interesting claim on <strong><a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/whats-new.html">the What’s New in Safari page</a></strong>:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Safari now uses Windows standard fonts, but you can choose to use Apple’s crisp anti-aliased fonts if you prefer.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Now, if you didn’t know any better, wouldn’t you take that to mean that Windows’ fonts <em>aren’t</em> anti-aliased? And that this was a special way in which only Safari could improve your life? Of course, you and I <em>do</em> know better, but&#8230; well, the libel laws of this country restrain me from further comment.<span id="more-5259"></span></p>
<p>The bit that particularly gets me is the way they emphasise the word “crisp”, as if to suggest that, next to Apple’s font rendering routines, Windows type just looks like a smeary blur. For the record, here’s a close-up on that fell phrase with standard Windows font smoothing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/windows.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5260" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/windows.png" alt="" width="428" height="33" /></a></p>
<p>And here it is again, this time using Apple’s specially imported <em>ne plus crispior </em>type engine:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/apple.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5261" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/apple.png" alt="" width="428" height="32" /></a></p>
<p>You have to admire their chutzpah, really. What are they going to come up with next? &#8220;Buy a Mac because it&#8217;s great for games&#8221;? <strong><a href="http://store.apple.com/uk/browse/campaigns/mac_games">Oh, wait&#8230;</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/03/05/a-not-so-sharp-distinction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

