<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; larrabee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/larrabee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nvidia responds: There&#8217;s cash in CUDA</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/01/nvidia-responds-to-my-cuda-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/01/nvidia-responds-to-my-cuda-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercomputing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Tamasi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some companies take a very laid back approach to the press. I could publicly allege that Itanium was a front for a money-laundering operation and I doubt I’d hear a peep of complaint from Intel.
Actually, that might explain a lot. But I digress.
The point is that Nvidia, unlike Intel, is acutely tuned in to what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/10/01/nvidia-responds-to-my-cuda-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Nvidia PhysX ever be worthwhile?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Nvidia has talked up its PhysX system incessantly since it bought Ageia Technologies, creator of the engine, in February 2008, but it’s struggled to make a significant impact on the PC gaming landscape. So, despite the impressive tech demos and endless optimism, is PhysX looking more like a white elephant with every passing GPU [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia&#8217;s confused GPUs</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 09:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray-tracing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nvidia aren&#8217;t known for their demure and shy antics, so I wasn&#8217;t surprised at a press briefing a few weeks ago when they launched an attack on what some quarters &#8211; namely Intel with their new Larrabee GPU &#8211; who have identified ray-tracing as the future of graphics.
They spent a great deal of time assuring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Squares Up to Intel</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8800 gt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9800 gtx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gx2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, after finding out that Intel were planning to release its own graphics card &#8211; the mysterious and, at the moment, practically mythical Larrabee &#8211; the Nvidia boardroom must have been a fun place to be. The GPU market is, after all, where the Californian company has ruled the roost for the past few years [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
