<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; graphics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/graphics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Will Nvidia PhysX ever be worthwhile?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Nvidia has talked up its PhysX system incessantly since it bought Ageia Technologies, creator of the engine, in February 2008, but it’s struggled to make a significant impact on the PC gaming landscape. So, despite the impressive tech demos and endless optimism, is PhysX looking more like a white elephant with every passing GPU [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/30/will-nvidia-physx-ever-be-worthwhile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First look: ATI Radeon HD 4830</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/24/first-look-ati-radeon-hd-4830/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/24/first-look-ati-radeon-hd-4830/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It seems that, at the moment, ATI is releasing fantastic graphics cards on a month-by-month basis. Now, it&#8217;s the turn of a part that&#8217;s been designed to sit between the Radeon HD 4670 and HD 4850 in ATI&#8217;s comprehensive line-up: the HD 4830.
The specifications reveal that, while the 4830 isn&#8217;t as powerful on paper as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/24/first-look-ati-radeon-hd-4830/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technological progress: lost on the masses</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/16/technological-progress-lost-on-the-masses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/16/technological-progress-lost-on-the-masses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[View from the Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I loaded up Steam for the first time in a while last night and was promptly asked to participate in Valve&#8217;s ongoing hardware survey. I&#8217;ve done this before, and the results are always fascinating, so I jumped right in. A few clicks later, and a quick scan of my cobbled-together PC, and I got to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/16/technological-progress-lost-on-the-masses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strange things afoot in the world of graphics</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/30/strange-things-afoot-in-the-world-of-graphics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/30/strange-things-afoot-in-the-world-of-graphics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExpressCard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCI Express]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=1047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I’ve been reading about not one, but two rather retro developments in the wacky world of graphics cards, and both have left me scratching my head.
The first is the re-announcement by Asus of its XG Station, which brings external graphics to laptops. It was first &#8220;launched&#8221; early last year, as a way to get [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/30/strange-things-afoot-in-the-world-of-graphics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia&#8217;s confused GPUs</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 09:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray-tracing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nvidia aren&#8217;t known for their demure and shy antics, so I wasn&#8217;t surprised at a press briefing a few weeks ago when they launched an attack on what some quarters &#8211; namely Intel with their new Larrabee GPU &#8211; who have identified ray-tracing as the future of graphics.
They spent a great deal of time assuring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Squares Up to Intel</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8800 gt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9800 gtx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gx2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, after finding out that Intel were planning to release its own graphics card &#8211; the mysterious and, at the moment, practically mythical Larrabee &#8211; the Nvidia boardroom must have been a fun place to be. The GPU market is, after all, where the Californian company has ruled the roost for the past few years [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
