<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; gpu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/gpu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reports of CUDA’s death exaggerated?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/reports-of-cuda%e2%80%99s-death-exaggerated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/reports-of-cuda%e2%80%99s-death-exaggerated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DirectX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DX11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPGPU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In my last post I suggested that DirectX 11’s extensive GPGPU support could mark the end of the road for CUDA. And I do expect that mass market GPU applications will quickly move to DirectX rather than restricting themselves to a single architecture.
But the other day I was discussing DX11 with Bit-Tech editor Tim Smalley, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/reports-of-cuda%e2%80%99s-death-exaggerated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All eyes on Nvidia as GTC kicks off</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/all-eyes-on-nvidia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/all-eyes-on-nvidia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE4100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moorestown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tegra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After last week’s Intel Developer Forum, it’s now Nvidia’s turn. Later on today the company will open its three-day GPU Technology Conference in San Jose – a more formal affair than last year’s flashy “Nvision” expo, but still a high-profile international event, and one which yours truly is lucky enough to be attending.
(The picture, in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/30/all-eyes-on-nvidia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First look: Nvidia&#8217;s integrated graphics</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/21/first-look-nvidias-integrated-graphics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/21/first-look-nvidias-integrated-graphics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[View from the Labs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nvida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel beware: Nvidia has its scope trained squarely on your dominance in the notebook graphics market. With an estimated 140 million laptops in the wild in 2008, more than two-thirds of which feature nothing more powerful than basic integrated graphics chips, it&#8217;s a huge segment that Nvidia has until now had no access to.
The 9400M [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/21/first-look-nvidias-integrated-graphics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://movies.itpro.co.uk/pcpro/blogs/AcceleratedRotation.wmv" length="3814512" type="video/x-ms-wmv" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just in: ATI Radeon HD 4870</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/27/just-in-ati-radeon-hd-4870/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/27/just-in-ati-radeon-hd-4870/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sparkes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Just in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is the ATI Radeon HD 4870, rumoured before its release to be one of the fastest cards around, and it has just landed in our labs, only one week after it was announced. 
It&#8217;s benchmarking downstairs in our labs as we speak &#8211; hence the odd angle in the image above &#8211; but we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/27/just-in-ati-radeon-hd-4870/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia&#8217;s confused GPUs</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 09:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ray-tracing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nvidia aren&#8217;t known for their demure and shy antics, so I wasn&#8217;t surprised at a press briefing a few weeks ago when they launched an attack on what some quarters &#8211; namely Intel with their new Larrabee GPU &#8211; who have identified ray-tracing as the future of graphics.
They spent a great deal of time assuring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/05/23/nvidias-confused-gpus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Squares Up to Intel</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8800 gt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9800 gtx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphics card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gx2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larrabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nvidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, after finding out that Intel were planning to release its own graphics card &#8211; the mysterious and, at the moment, practically mythical Larrabee &#8211; the Nvidia boardroom must have been a fun place to be. The GPU market is, after all, where the Californian company has ruled the roost for the past few years [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/04/28/nvidia-squares-up-to-intel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
