<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Flash 10.1: Developing for Desktop and Device</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/18/flash-10-1-developing-for-desktop-and-device/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/18/flash-10-1-developing-for-desktop-and-device/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Just in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open screen project]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=10180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Yesterday Adobe made the beta of its new Flash 10.1 player available for desktop testing via Adobe Labs. The fact that it’s only a point release suggests that it’s a relatively trivial update but that’s not the case. In fact 10.1 is one of the most significant releases in the history of Flash.

What makes Flash 10.1 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/18/flash-10-1-developing-for-desktop-and-device/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PowerPoint and Silverlight: a perfect match?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/09/powerpoint-and-silverlight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/09/powerpoint-and-silverlight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Office 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=9796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With its place at the heart of the Microsoft Office suite, PowerPoint is the overwhelmingly dominant presentation software for business. However it has a fundamental flaw &#8211; it still doesn&#8217;t offer an in-built route for efficient, cross-platform, screen-based web delivery. For a program whose whole purpose is to help users get their message over, this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/11/09/powerpoint-and-silverlight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Your Browser Do This? Adaptive Layout</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/14/can-your-browser-do-this-adaptive-layout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/14/can-your-browser-do-this-adaptive-layout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive layout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Recently I wrote that what makes RIAs (Rich Internet Applications) different from browser-native web applications isn&#8217;t rich functionality or rich content but rich design. Moreover I argued that only a player-based approach (effectively Flash/Flex or Silverlight/WPF) can provide the platform necessary to take web design to the next level.
As I expected, the feedback to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/14/can-your-browser-do-this-adaptive-layout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google and Rich Internet Applications (RIAs)</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/01/google-and-rich-internet-applications-rias/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/01/google-and-rich-internet-applications-rias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich internet application]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally speaking, I&#8217;m not a fan of Google&#8217;s browser-native approach to web application development. Strategically I can see the advantages (wide and open access) and politically I think it&#8217;s admirable (open standards) but, in design terms, this lowest common denominator approach proves disastrous.
For example in a comparison between the barebones HTML-based Google Docs and the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/01/google-and-rich-internet-applications-rias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real reason Microsoft has given in over Internet Explorer</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/08/03/the-real-reason-microsoft-has-given-in-over-internet-explorer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/08/03/the-real-reason-microsoft-has-given-in-over-internet-explorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon Honeyball</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why is Microsoft giving in over Internet Explorer? What&#8217;s the true motivation for the so-called browser ballot? It hasn&#8217;t been forced into the matter, although it could be argued that this was coming over the hill from the EU.
No, I think there is another reason, but this is pure speculation. I think Microsoft is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/08/03/the-real-reason-microsoft-has-given-in-over-internet-explorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silverlight not so Flash for Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/30/silverlight-not-so-flash-for-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/30/silverlight-not-so-flash-for-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Turton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When Microsoft announced it was launching an iPlayer rival I could barely hear the words over the onrushing sound of catastrophic failure. If you listen closely, you can hear it too&#8230;. Huuuluuu, Huuuluuu, Hulu.
Having used Hulu, I can testify that it&#8217;s brilliant and now its flame-filled eyes of domination are on the UK. If the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/30/silverlight-not-so-flash-for-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe rips off / the wraps on Catalyst</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/01/adobe-flashcatalyst-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/01/adobe-flashcatalyst-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Two announcements from Adobe today. 
First the bad news&#8230;

&#8230; and an average 10% hike in the price of CS4 suites and apps blamed on “currency fluctuations.” 
It is true that the pound has fallen against the dollar since CS4 was launched as I pointed out in a previous post.  However it has been rising steadily since and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/01/adobe-flashcatalyst-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash Penetration: The Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/27/flash-penetration-the-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/27/flash-penetration-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I posted an item questioning Adobe’s claim that “Flash content reaches 99.0% of Internet viewers”. I made the argument on a number of grounds but the bottom line was that the figure just seemed unbelievable when you factor in the number of Linux users and other Flash haters (joke) as well as all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/27/flash-penetration-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>99% Flash Player Penetration – Too Good to be True?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/20/99-percent-flash-player-penetration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/20/99-percent-flash-player-penetration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe makes much of the fact that its Flash player has become” the world&#8217;s most pervasive software platform” bridging the worlds of PC, Mac and Linux. Nowadays this claim is generally taken as read but ultimately it depends on the ubiquity of the Flash player as advertised on the Adobe site.

But should the claims be taken [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/20/99-percent-flash-player-penetration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acrobat, Flash and iPaper</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/12/acrobat-flash-and-ipaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/12/acrobat-flash-and-ipaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acrobat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scribd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=5159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In my last digital design column in the latest issue of the magazine I take a look at the long history of “iPaper”. It’s essentially the story of the holy grail for designers: a format that manages to combine the design strengths and reading experience of paper with the unbeatable advantages offered by the internet [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/02/12/acrobat-flash-and-ipaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
