<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; flash drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/flash-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A tiny drive that holds billions of bits</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/06/15/a-tiny-drive-that-holds-billions-of-bits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/06/15/a-tiny-drive-that-holds-billions-of-bits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darien Graham-Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubious mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=17827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
“Dude, someone’s snapped the end off your USB stick.” That’s what you’d probably say if you saw the new Lexar Echo ZE flash drive sitting on my desk.
Yet I can assure you, as one dude to another, that no one has. What you see above is the whole thing. Somehow, while I was briefly looking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17830" title="Lexar" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Lexar.png" alt="Lexar" width="462" height="298" /></p>
<p>“Dude, someone’s snapped the end off your USB stick.” That’s what you’d probably say if you saw the new Lexar Echo ZE flash drive sitting on my desk.</p>
<p>Yet I can assure you, as one dude to another, that no one has. What you see above is the whole thing. Somehow, while I was briefly looking the other way, flash drives have become so compact that the entire device is now basically the size of the plug.<span id="more-17827"></span></p>
<p><strong>Billions of bits</strong></p>
<p>And this isn’t a little 512MB drive either &mdash; not that 512MB is actually little. In these days of terabyte hard disks we’ve become accustomed to thinking of anything less than a gigabyte as piddling small change; but 512MB is still 4,294,967,296 binary cells. That’s a lot of cells. If each one were a mere millimetre in size, 4,294,967,296 of them in a row would stretch from here to Baghdad. Don&#8217;t ask about latency.</p>
<p>Yet what we have here is even more impressive. The Lexar Echo ZE is a 32GB device, which according to Excel means it holds an amazing 2.74878E+11 bits. At one millimetre per bit, that’s enough bits to reach three quarters of the way to the moon.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Echo ZE crams its 274 billion cells into a tiny nub roughly a quarter of a cubic centimetre in volume
</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, one millimetre per bit is a wholly imaginary scale, which I made up simply because a millimetre is pretty much the smallest unit of measurement I can visualise. In reality, the Echo ZE crams its 274 billion cells into a tiny nub roughly a quarter of a cubic centimetre in volume. If my GCSE maths hasn’t wholly deserted me, this means that, on average, each cubic millimetre of this thing stores around 131MB of data. If you’re old, like me, you may enjoy visualising that as 373 5.25&#8243; floppy disks, teetering in an unlikely column.</p>
<p><strong>An archive in your pocket</strong></p>
<p>Though this advance in storage density is strictly speaking only quantitative, it opens up whole new possibilities. The Echo ZE is marketed as a backup drive that’s compact enough to leave plugged in at all times, and that’s a pretty ingenious angle — look out for a review soon.</p>
<p>But personally, as soon as I saw the Echo ZE I started thinking about how convenient it would be to keep multiple OS distributions in my pocket, not to mention applications, perhaps a copy of the <em>PC Pro</em> benchmarks, even – why not? – a whole library of books, films and TV shows.</p>
<p>(Eventually the idea of carrying data anywhere will be absurd, of course, because it’ll all be floating about in the cloud, ready to be accessed from wherever you happen to be. But if you think that’s viable today, click <a href="http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/5.0.4/amd64/iso-dvd/debian-504-amd64-DVD-1.iso">here</a> and let me know when you get bored. For bonus points, try it over a 3G connection.)</p>
<p><strong>Size and capacity</strong></p>
<p>To be fair, the Echo ZE isn’t the most capacious USB flash drive we’ve seen: that would be <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/reviews/external-hdds/350680/kingston-datatraveler-300"> Kingston’s 256GB DataTraveler 300</a>. I shudder to think how many bits that one holds. But the Kingston drive is, by the standards of these things, a comparatively chunky device. If I were to keep it in my pocket I would be inviting an unending stream of comedy from my hilarious colleagues with respect to the bulge in my trousers. Since the DataTraveler 300 still sells for over £600, I would also be inviting a well-deserved mugging.</p>
<p>The Echo ZE, by contrast, is so tiny and light that you can stick it in a pocket and genuinely forget about it until you need it. Plus, since it costs little more than £60, losing it wouldn’t be quite such a disaster.</p>
<p>Having said that, since it has no sort of clip or cord to attach to a key-ring, I <em>would</em> lose it. And the loss wouldn’t be merely financial: think of the data! 274 billion bits gone, just like that, fallen through a hole in my pocket, or accidentally swept into a friend’s bin.</p>
<p>But to me that is, in a slightly cussed way, perhaps the most inspiring reflection of all. How fantastic it is that we live in a world where you can so easily misplace ninety thousand floppy disks’ worth of data! And it makes me wonder — what might we be able to lose tomorrow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/06/15/a-tiny-drive-that-holds-billions-of-bits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ubuntu disappointment and data disasters</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/04/ubuntu-disappointment-and-data-disasters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/04/ubuntu-disappointment-and-data-disasters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Turton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ubuntu 8.10 made its appearence this week, and while everybody was busy touting the network manager&#8217;s new-fangled ability to handle mobile broadband connections, what nobody seemed to be mentioning was that it doesn&#8217;t actually work very well.
The networking manager is brilliant. It&#8217;s a nice clean interface that shows you all the internet connections on your computer, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/shutterstock_12120064.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4089" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/shutterstock_12120064-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>Ubuntu 8.10 made its appearence this week, and while everybody was busy touting the network manager&#8217;s new-fangled ability to handle mobile broadband connections, what nobody seemed to be mentioning was that it doesn&#8217;t actually work very well.</p>
<p>The networking manager is brilliant. It&#8217;s a nice clean interface that shows you all the internet connections on your computer, whether that&#8217;s Wi-Fi, mobile broadband or any other. It works fantastically well for Wi-Fi, putting Vista&#8217;s overly fiddly version in the shade. </p>
<p>Mobile broadband is an entirely different matter, though. We have three USB dongles in the office &#8211; <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/features/212520/mobile-broadband-the-verdict.html"><strong>hangovers from our mobile broadband comparison feature</strong></a>. Of the three, Ubuntu refused to recognise the O2 dongle even existed, and while it acknowledged the BT dongle, it had absolutely no idea what to do with it. In fact, lucky number 3 was the only one that worked, but it worked beautifully. We just plugged it in, selected the 3 option and off we went. No need to install software or drivers of any sort. Great stuff, but country to popular opinion, one out of three is actually bad.<span id="more-4086"></span></p>
<p>Mind you, while I was disappointed with the network manager, I was far more impressed with how easy Ubuntu 8.10 makes it to run a persistent OS from a flash pen drive &#8211; a feature that&#8217;s been around for a while, but usually accompanied by a long list of intimidating instructions that look like they&#8217;ve been typed by somebody with frying pan for hands. In my humble opinion, the ability to carry your operating system around with you is the future, though not one I&#8217;ll be embracing after this week.</p>
<p>You see yesterday my flash drive with all my files on it went the way of the Dodo. Being me, I hadn&#8217;t bothered backing anything up in &#8230; erm&#8230; three years, or so. I&#8217;ve since been on a rollercoaster ride of hope, despair, and downright anger trying out a number of recovery programs in order to salvage some of my files. So, far this has yeilded some older temp files, but not the latest versions, which is a pain.</p>
<p>None of this, of course, would have happened if I&#8217;d transferred my files onto Windows Live Mesh, as I&#8217;d been intending. Unfortunately, everytime I&#8217;ve tried to get it running on my work machine, it&#8217;s thrown up half a dozen little errors and crashed, hence I never bothered. </p>
<p>My data disaster has prompted me to try out Drop Box though, which is very much like Live Mesh &#8211; except that it works. For a comparison of the two you could do worse than <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/07/04/live-mesh-vs-dropbox/"><strong>following this shiny link</strong></a> where our own Mr Collins lays out the difference.</p>
<p>And the lessons to be learned from all this? Stuart is simple, Microsoft still can&#8217;t do simple, and Ubuntu hasn&#8217;t worked out how to do simple well.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/11/04/ubuntu-disappointment-and-data-disasters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

