<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; error</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/error/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dell&#8217;s misleading graphics card buying advice</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/11/23/dells-unhelpful-graphics-card-buying-advice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/11/23/dells-unhelpful-graphics-card-buying-advice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Jennings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=45520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell should be commended for going out of its way to help novice PC buyers, but its entry for choosing a graphics card &#8212; accessible by clicking the “Help me choose” link when customising various Optiplex models &#8212; contains a glaring and potentially expensive error, as spotted by Reddit users.
While the text is basic, it’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell should be commended for going out of its way to help novice PC buyers, but its entry for <a title="Dell's choosing a graphics card page" href="http://content.dell.com/uk/en/business/d/help-me-choose/hmc-graphics-optiplex" target="_blank">choosing a graphics card</a> &#8212; accessible by clicking the “Help me choose” link when <a title="Dell Optiplex 790" href="http://configure.euro.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=x1179005&amp;c=uk&amp;l=en&amp;s=bsd&amp;cs=ukbsdt1&amp;model_id=optiplex-790" target="_blank">customising various Optiplex models</a> &#8212; contains a glaring and potentially expensive error, <a title="Original Reddit thread." href="http://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/comments/mle4f/is_this_image_on_the_dell_website_complete_bcks/" target="_blank">as spotted by Reddit users</a>.</p>
<p>While the text is basic, it’s accurate enough for beginners. Instead, it’s the image that contains a dangerous chunk of misinformation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dell-image-2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-45535" title="Dell" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dell-image-2.jpg" alt="Dell" width="445" height="269" /></a></p>
<p>The monitor on the left, labelled as a PC that uses a “standard graphics card”, is displaying a Windows desktop that’s washed out and blurry. The seemingly identical Dell TFT on the right, powered by a “high-end graphics card”, is showing the same desktop – but this time it’s much sharper and more vivid. They&#8217;re both outputting at the same resolution.<span id="more-45520"></span></p>
<p>It’s true that using different screens can alter how a desktop looks, but that’s not the case here: Dell’s page uses two identical monitors that display two identical desktops, with the dramatic change in its appearance apparently caused by the different classes of discrete graphics card being used.</p>
<p>It is, quite simply, rubbish. Any modern discrete graphics card, whether a mid-range model or a more powerful part, is more than capable of displaying a Windows desktop. There’s no chance that by choosing two of the different graphics options available with the Optiplex 790 – let’s say the £86 inc VAT AMD Radeon HD 6350 and the £256 inc VAT dual Radeon HD 6450 option – a desktop will look any different on the cheaper card.</p>
<p>Dell’s page says that its picture is for “demonstrative purposes only”, but it’s not demonstrating anything that’s remotely accurate. Instead, this misleading page appears to suggest that a more expensive graphics card will mean even the Windows desktop will be made brighter and sharper.</p>
<p>That’s especially unfair on a page that’s clearly aimed at novice users – the exact people who will trust this information from a well-known brand, and who’ll fork out extra cash for a graphics card that’s simply unnecessary.</p>
<p><em>Dell has issued a statement regarding this issue, which we&#8217;ve posted in full below. <a title="Dell apologises for misleading graphics advice." href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/371425/dell-apologises-for-misleading-graphics-card-advice" target="_blank">The full story can be read here.</a></em></p>
<p><em>“Thank you for bringing this to our attention. Dell endeavours to help customers to make the best decisions regarding their purchases. It was never our intention to mislead customers, and we apologise for any confusion caused. We have now removed the image from our Global sites. Dell remains committed to delivering the best possible experience to all our customers.”</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/11/23/dells-unhelpful-graphics-card-buying-advice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Knuth launches The Bank of San Serriffe</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/31/knuth-launches-the-bank-of-san-serriffe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/31/knuth-launches-the-bank-of-san-serriffe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sparkes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knuth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=4020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald Knuth, creator of TeX and author of The Art of Computer Programming, used to post checks to anyone who spotted an error in one of his books – one hexadecimal dollar, or $2.56. It was a clever way to ensure that his work was as accurate as possible.
Nobody used to take the money, though. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/502039190_5ed551419d.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-4023 alignleft" src="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/502039190_5ed551419d-300x133.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="133" /></a>Donald Knuth, creator of TeX and author of The Art of Computer Programming, used to post checks to anyone who spotted an error in one of his books – one hexadecimal dollar, or $2.56. It was a clever way to ensure that his work was as accurate as possible.</p>
<p>Nobody used to take the money, though. Instead the cheques are pinned up on notice boards in computer science departments all over the world as mementos. I’m lucky enough to have two, which I&#8217;ve stashed away at home.</p>
<p>“It turns out that only 9 of the first 275 checks that I&#8217;ve sent out since the beginning of 2006 have actually been cashed. The others have apparently been cached,” says Knuth on his website.<span id="more-4020"></span></p>
<p>Unfortunately, though, he’s been forced to stop because of bank fraud. “The system that I&#8217;ve been using has worked well for almost forty years; but recently I have had to close three checking accounts, and the criminal attacks on those accounts have caused significant grief to my bankers,” says Knuth.</p>
<p>To get around this, he&#8217;s started the fictional <a href="http://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/boss.html"><strong>Bank of San Serriffe</strong></a>, whose website now lists account balances instead. It&#8217;s the end of a tradition which has lasted 40 years &#8211; almost as long as computer science itself. The main irritation, though, is that I&#8217;m now going to have to find a new error to get listed on the site.</p>
<p><em>Thanks to G0SUB for the picture</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/10/31/knuth-launches-the-bank-of-san-serriffe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

