<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>RockMelt: Yet another web browser</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/08/19/rockmelt-yet-another-web-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/08/19/rockmelt-yet-another-web-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Simon Brock</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another month and another web browser. This week, we have been introduced via a New York Times article to Rockmelt. Details are at the non-existent end of sketchy but we do know a little bit about who is behind it.
Back when the web was young, we all used the Netscape Navigator browser. Netscape which was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/08/19/rockmelt-yet-another-web-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft, Windows 7, the EU and common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/27/microsoft-windows-7-the-eu-and-common-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/27/microsoft-windows-7-the-eu-and-common-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Danton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world&#8217;s gone crazy. Surely Microsoft can&#8217;t have decided to do what&#8217;s been blindingly obvious to the rest of the world for eternity and &#8211; gasp &#8211; offer users a choice of web browsers when they install Windows 7? And thus, in one fell and seemingly easy swoop, appease the EU and its browser-producing competition?
But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/27/microsoft-windows-7-the-eu-and-common-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Chrome so polished?</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/09/why-is-chrome-so-polished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/09/why-is-chrome-so-polished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Turton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using Chrome for a few days now, and something&#8217;s been bugging me about it. Nothing immediately obvious, just a vague sense of something being not quite right. Then, as I was tromping into work this morning, munching on bacon sandwich, I finally put my finger on it. What&#8217;s bothering me, is that I can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/09/why-is-chrome-so-polished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Chrome: first impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight, I attended a Google briefing on its hastily-launched web browser, Chrome – which is now available for download here.
At first glance, the browser looked extremely impressive. In fact, it’s the only browser I’ve seen that could seriously tempt me away from my snug-fitting default browser, Firefox. However, I must stress that I was only [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/google-chrome-first-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox loses its sugar daddy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/firefox-loses-its-sugar-daddy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/firefox-loses-its-sugar-daddy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Google’s shock entry into the browser market might be bad news for Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, but it could be terminal for Mozilla and Firefox.
Google is Mozilla’s sugar daddy. In 2006 (the latest figures we have available), a staggering 85% of Mozilla Corp’s revenue came from the homepage and search deal it has with Google. Firefox [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/firefox-loses-its-sugar-daddy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 3 already rules the roost</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/27/firefox-3-already-rules-the-roost/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/27/firefox-3-already-rules-the-roost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=2145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full version of Firefox 3 has been available for all of 10 days now, and already it&#8217;s the most popular version of the browser being used to visit our website. I know Mozilla had a huge publicity drive to encourage people to download on day one and that Firefox is pretty active at encouraging [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/27/firefox-3-already-rules-the-roost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
