<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; browser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Can Your Browser Do This? Adaptive Layout</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/14/can-your-browser-do-this-adaptive-layout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/14/can-your-browser-do-this-adaptive-layout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Arah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real World Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive layout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=7279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Recently I wrote that what makes RIAs (Rich Internet Applications) different from browser-native web applications isn&#8217;t rich functionality or rich content but rich design. Moreover I argued that only a player-based approach (effectively Flash/Flex or Silverlight/WPF) can provide the platform necessary to take web design to the next level.
As I expected, the feedback to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/09/14/can-your-browser-do-this-adaptive-layout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 4 looks awfully familiar&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/28/firefox-4-looks-awfully-familiar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/28/firefox-4-looks-awfully-familiar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox 3.5 is still fresh, but Mozilla has been busy mocking up its early concepts for the big move to version 4. Now, these images come with a great big disclaimer that &#8220;These are NOT FINAL! THEY ARE ONLY FOR BRAINSTORMING/EXPLORATION!&#8220;, but it&#8217;s interesting to see which direction Firefox could be taking. Take a look for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/07/28/firefox-4-looks-awfully-familiar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First look: Firefox 3.5</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/22/playing-with-firefox-35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/22/playing-with-firefox-35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sparkes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=6001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox 3.5 is out as a Release Candidate &#8211; as close to a final version as you can get without being a final version &#8211; so I&#8217;ve taken a look to see how it compares to its competitors.
Porn/Private Browsing
Most other browsers already had this feature, and now Firefox does too. With nothing more than a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2009/06/22/playing-with-firefox-35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NeverEnding Beta (Google, 2004)</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/25/the-neverending-beta-google-2004/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/25/the-neverending-beta-google-2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 15:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Bayon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when Gmail first arrived? Unless you&#8217;re unlucky enough to be called John Smith you probably got the username you wanted first time, and without having to add six digits on to the end. Then you experienced the fun of sending invites to your mates so they could join you in your exclusive little club [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/25/the-neverending-beta-google-2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
