<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Pro blog &#187; Ask</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/tag/ask/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:17:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Firefox loses its sugar daddy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/firefox-loses-its-sugar-daddy-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/firefox-loses-its-sugar-daddy-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barry Collins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newsdesk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=3123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Google’s shock entry into the browser market might be bad news for Microsoft’s Internet Explorer, but it could be terminal for Mozilla and Firefox.
Google is Mozilla’s sugar daddy. In 2006 (the latest figures we have available), a staggering 85% of Mozilla Corp’s revenue came from the homepage and search deal it has with Google. Firefox [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/09/02/firefox-loses-its-sugar-daddy-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
