Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Latest Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds

Windows 7 or Snow Leopard: which is better value for money?

November 13th, 2009 by Chris Brennan

I’m nearing the end of my month with Windows 7 and so I’d thought it would be a good idea to have a look at the pricing structure. If I’m going to invest it’s probably best to know just how much I’m going to have to spend on this OS. The laptop I was supplied with came with Windows 7 Ultimate, but having listened to the PC Pro podcast on the subject I’m under the impression that Home Premium will be more than sufficient.
It’s a bit odd as a Mac user to have the choice of operating system as the Mac OS comes in just two flavours: Standard and Server. If I step back to Home Premium from Ultimate am I likely to see any difference whatsoever? No, not at all seems to be the general consensus which begs the question why does Microsoft put that doubt in  my mind? If you’re going to make your Home Premium product so all encompassing why bother with a Professional or Ultimate edition? Did the extra capabilities in the other versions really cost that much more to develop?
Apple makes great play of its single version approach and though I’m not exactly confused to the point of delirium by the 3 Windows options the pricing does seem to add to the overall complexity of making the right choice. According to my local PC World the difference between a full boxed copy of Windows 7 Professional and Ultimate is £20 which seems an odd sum, why produce two editions so close together? Of course, the ability to upgrade is a simple solution to this problem and should I find that I’m missing out on that desperately needed feature that’s only available in Ultimate I can always add it at a later date.
Having said all that, the simplicity of the Macs single upgrade approach does have its drawbacks too. My copy of Leopard cost about £90 if memory serves and Tiger the same before that and Panther come to think of it.
The latest OS upgrade, Snow Leopard cost me £25. There was just the one version of each of these and I was getting the full copy for my money. However, I’m sure they’re no where near the value of a full new version of Windows, with the exception of Snow Leopard that is. I’m not really sold that Apple iterations are simply service pack, there’s more to them than that, but they’re not complete new systems that’s for sure. So, despite the slightly more complex approach to choosing the Windows OS that’s right for me it certainly feels like it’ll be better value over its lifetime.

In the latest part of our bid to convert a Mac user to Windows 7, Chris Brennan explores the ever thorny issue of pricing

Notes

I’m nearing the end of my month with Windows 7 and so I’d thought it would be a good idea to have a look at the pricing structure. If I’m going to invest it’s probably best to know just how much I’m going to have to spend on this OS.

The laptop I was supplied with came with Windows 7 Ultimate, but having listened to the PC Pro podcast on the subject I’m under the impression that Home Premium will be more than sufficient.

It’s a bit odd as a Mac user to have the choice of operating system as the Mac OS comes in just two flavours: Standard and Server. If I step back to Home Premium from Ultimate am I likely to see any difference whatsoever? No, not at all seems to be the general consensus which begs the question why does Microsoft put that doubt in  my mind?

Read more

Posted in: Windows 7 | 8 Comments »

Is Microsoft listening too hard to customers?

November 11th, 2009 by Chris Brennan

The current Windows 7 advertising campaign can’t fail to have grabbed your attention. Essentially, Microsoft is saying that you, the user designed this latest incarnation of the world’s most popular operating system. They listened to what you wanted and put it in Windows 7. Does that mean you were responsible for Vista too I wonder? Could an advertising campaign convince me to switch?
The I’m a PC campaign was launched in 2008 in response to the I’m a Mac advertising campaign, which believe it or not started way back in 2006. I have never liked the I’m a Mac campaign as at it’s heart is a childish message: you’re not me and I’m better than you so ner.
There’s no doubt that the Apple campaign has been successful, it wouldn’t have run and still be running all these years later if it wasn’t. The ads are slick and well produced, even dare I say it amusing. But perhaps the most important thing about them is that there’s rarely a price or product in them. It’s your own imagination, with a nudge from the caricatures that sells you into the brand.
The I’m a PC adverts are all together more friendly and human. The man at the gym, the woman in a taxi, the mum at home with the kids they’re real people in the real world that I can associate with. Do I really want them designing an OS though? Is Microsoft saying that after 20 odd years of designing operating systems that Mimi, Crystal and Ramin were the missing link?
There’s a tale that’s probably not true, but it makes a nice story.The Microsoft Word team were praised to the high heavens for Word 5.1 for the Mac, it was slick, quick and just what people wanted then they listened to the users and added all the extra features that those users demanded. Today users complain about a bloated, creaky and crash prone application when all they wanted was Word 5.1 with this ‘one’ extra feature. It’s not because the developers are poor that Word for Mac is so maligned it’s because users are sometimes the worst judges of what they need.
Perhaps, that’s the difference between Apple and Microsoft laid bare in the marketing and their products. Microsoft listens too hard to too many users and tries to please every one where Apple doesn’t listen to anyone; it’s already perfect you just didn’t realise. The Microsoft adverts aren’t really having much of an effect on my opinion of Windows 7, but they’re better than the wow starts now of Vista. It’s a start.

In the latest part of our bid to convert a Mac user to Windows 7, Chris Brennan compares the adverts of Microsoft and Apple and draws some interesting conclusions

PC

The current Windows 7 advertising campaign can’t fail to have grabbed your attention. Essentially, Microsoft is saying that you, the user, designed this latest incarnation of the world’s most popular operating system. They listened to what you wanted and put it in Windows 7.

Does that mean you were responsible for Vista too I wonder? Could an advertising campaign convince me to switch?

The I’m a PC campaign was launched in 2008 in response to the I’m a Mac advertising campaign, which believe it or not started way back in 2006. I have never liked the I’m a Mac campaign as at its heart is a childish message: you’re not me and I’m better than you so ner.

Read more

Posted in: Windows 7 | 9 Comments »

SimplicITy ‘over 50s’ PC is so un-PC

November 11th, 2009 by Mark Newton

Valerie SingletonThis morning I had a press release emailed to me about a new range of systems by simplicITy computers to be launched today by Valerie Singleton, her of Blue Peter and ’sticky-backed plastic’ fame. She was also presenter of the BBC Money program for many years.

What got me fuming was that this range of computers was for the ‘over 50s’, those people whose brains are just too old and addled to understand new technology, like me and a lot of my friends. I find the term ’silver surfer’ particularly annoying; my hair went grey in my mid-30s so presumably dementia set in then as well. Heck, even our own youthful Jon Honeyball has a few threads of grey, so perhaps he’ll need some help with his computer soon!

By all means market a computer for ‘those who find existing computers confusing,’ but this assumption that the over-50s and silver surfers have special needs is just plain ageist.

As for this computer launch, the operating system is Linux, so you are not going to find as much local help for that as you would with a Windows machine. By all means build an easy-to-use interface on top of Windows, make a simple email client, and remove all the unnecessary buttons from the browser (or use Chrome). But keep an operating system underneath that your kids can help you with, and that has support for all those devices that you might want to plug into it.

I’ll get off me soapbox now.

Microsoft still unsure of Windows 7 success?

November 10th, 2009 by Steve Cassidy

blog

There are a few signs here at TechEd that Microsoft wasn’t quite as sure about the runaway success of Windows 7 as its fanboys (me included).

In planning the layout of the show stalls in the exhibition halls, Microsoft has ensured plenty of space to gently introduce skeptics to its new hot product. You can wander up and furtle about with example machines, and if you stand there too long a Nice Person will come up and ask if you’ve seen this or that cool feature. I thought I was being even ruder than usual by brushing them off – then some Russian delegates popped up beside me and showed me how to do that brush-off thing properly.

Read more

Tags: ,

Posted in: Windows 7 | 1 Comment »

Sky Mobile TV app brings live sport to the iPhone

November 10th, 2009 by David Bayon

Spotify generated huge excitement when it launched with its offer of unlimited music for £10 a month, but this simply blows it out of the water. Sky has today launched a new Mobile TV app which offers live streaming of a selection of its most popular premium channels for a monthly fee, and you don’t even have to be a Sky TV subscriber at home.

Sky Sports

The core Sky Mobile TV News and Sports app is available for free, and offers full listings for the core sports and news channels. But for the paltry sum of £6 a month, you can stream live coverage from those channels over a Wi-Fi connection. Read more

Microsoft shows courage at Tech-Ed 09

November 9th, 2009 by Steve Cassidy

Microsoft Tech-Ed europe 2009 entranceThe initial signs for this year’s Tech-Ed Europe - Microsoft’s annual get-together for its product gurus, partners and IT professionals – being the sort of show rich with standing ovations are not good.

Microsoft is in Berlin around the celebrations of the fall of the Berlin Wall, just after U2 has smeared the town with its dubious neo-political imprimatur, and just before Thanksgiving in the US – it’s one of those periods that might well be marked by suggestions in emails as “a good time to bury some bad news”. But: there’s some good stuff here. Calm stuff; stuff which shows MS is getting down to business, and not distracting the world with dancing paperclips.

The basic raw headlines are that Exchange 2010 goes to public availability as from today, worldwide: and Microsoft is very pleased with some rational improvements. Read more

PowerPoint and Silverlight: a perfect match?

November 9th, 2009 by Tom Arah

Silverlight Powerpoint presentation

With its place at the heart of the Microsoft Office suite, PowerPoint is the overwhelmingly dominant presentation software for business. However it has a fundamental flaw – it still doesn’t offer an in-built route for efficient, cross-platform, screen-based web delivery. For a program whose whole purpose is to help users get their message over, this is quite astonishing and unforgivable as we approach 2010.

Microsoft might not provide its own solution but there are plenty of third-party applications which fill the gap such as Adobe’s Captivate and Presenter, the bargain Flair from WildFX and my personal favourite Articulate Presenter. The major embarrassment for Microsoft is that these all rely on the Adobe Flash format.

It’s an embarrassment that is made considerably worse by the fact that Microsoft is currently busily touting its own cross-platform web format, Silverlight, as a direct alternative to Flash. It’s clear that PowerPoint and Silverlight should make a perfect match and native Silverlight export would certainly go a long way to explaining (if not excusing) PowerPoint’s lack of support for Flash.

So where is the ability to convert PowerPoint to Silverlight?

Read more

Why all the fuss over Windows Explorer?

November 9th, 2009 by Chris Brennan

The Finder on the Mac seems much maligned by many Windows users and I have to admit I’m not sure why. Since using Windows 7 I’ve found the methods of storing and finding files much the same. The finder and explorer windows look strikingly similar and can be viewed in much the same way.
After using the windows explorer I’m not really convinced it’s necessarily better than the finder, but as I’ve already said that may well be because I’m more used to the Mac way of doing things. I have to admit that the smart folders of OSX are a much better solution than libraries in Windows 7. Unless I’m missing something (and there’s a rather large chance I am) they’re not as flexible. I have a smart folder on my Mac desktop that has all the .jpg files I’ve opened in the last month and one that has all the PDF files with Invoice in the name that are created between April 2009 and 10. As far as I can tell I can’t have a library that does the same. If I’m wrong I’m sure you’ll point it out in the comments.
The search box in windows explorer seems much slower than the results provided by the search box in the start menu, which doesn’t seem right. For instance, if I go to the start menu and type editor@pcpro I get all the most recent emails I’ve sent to Tim and documents that contain that address almost instantaneously, If I do the same with the search box in windows explorer the search takes much longer. The two search boxes should surely be equal surely?
There are some elements of Windows 7 that really don’t make any sense to me at all. The control panel window, in my setup at least, has 51 separate entries. A couple of those are for installations I’ve performed: QuickTime and MobileMe. However, that still makes for a window that has 49 items. Obviously, Microsoft has thought about this and come up with the category view, but  I’m not sure it truly makes things clearer for the user. There’s inconsistency too, when you click any of the control panel items – some open a new window, some take you forward like a browser would and finally some take you to a different style of window altogether. I also received a number of ‘The page failed to load’ errors when clicking the various control panels. This, I’m going to guess isn’t indicative of normal service, but it hasn’t made my experience in this area a particularly positive one.
I’d be the first to say that my problems with explorer are mostly trivial rather than serious concerns, but the deeper I go into the Windows system the more I find that feels odd to me. Perhaps, I’ve become so ingrained to the Mac way of doing things that I’ve grown accustomed to the inconsistencies of that OS, but that doesn’t mean that Windows 7 doesn’t have it’s share of weird and not so wonderful design flaws.

In the latest part of our bid to convert a Mac user to Windows 7, Chris Brennan compares Finder to Explorer and wonders what all the fuss is about

Windows Explorer

The Finder on the Mac seems much maligned by many Windows users and I have to admit I’m not sure why. Since using Windows 7 I’ve found the methods of storing and finding files much the same. The Finder and Explorer windows look strikingly similar and can be viewed in much the same way.

After using the Windows Explorer I’m not really convinced it’s necessarily better than the Finder, but as I’ve already said that may well be because I’m more used to the Mac way of doing things. I have to admit that the smart folders of OSX are a much better solution than libraries in Windows 7. Unless I’m missing something (and there’s a rather large chance I am) they’re not as flexible.

Read more

Tags: ,

Posted in: Windows 7 | 12 Comments »

Your iPhone has a virus? Well it’s your fault

November 9th, 2009 by Jon Honeyball

Your iPhone might be under attack from Rick AstleySo anyone who has hacked their iPhone now finds it open to attack. There is one word to describe this – “excellent”. I am extremely pleased that this has come about. I am delighted that people who have hacked their iPhone are now under attack. Read more

Posted in: Rant | 4 Comments »

Motorola pays Lucas for its Droid

November 6th, 2009 by Mike Jennings

R2D2

Google’s Android operating system seems to be gathering pace, with more and more phones emerging that run the Open Source mobile OS – in the past few months we’ve reviewed the Samsung i7500 Galaxy, HTC Hero and HTC Magic.

One phone that’s gathering momentum across the pond is the Motorola Droid and, from early previews, it’s easy to see why: as well as offering the numerous benefits of Android, it also has a sliding Qwerty keyboard, 3.7in capacitive touchscreen, 5mp camera, GPS and Wi-Fi. It’s also the first phone to ship with Google Maps Navigation installed.

In short, it sounds superb – but that’s not the most interesting thing about one of the most-hyped smartphones of the past several months.Motorola DROID

The most interesting thing about Motorola’s new phone can actually be found on the Droid homepage. Look past the flashy graphics towards the copyright notices at the bottom of the screen – you know, the part that everyone usually ignores – and read the bottom line, which says:

“DROID is a trademark of Lucasfilm Ltd. and its related companies. Used under license.”

So it appears that Motorola can’t call its new Android phone the Droid unless they pay a certain Mr. Lucas a hefty wodge of cash to stop him turning up at the Chicago firm’s HQ with a battery of lawyers.

Who knew that R2D2 could prove so profitable?

Thanks to Brian Sharp at WikiTravel for the R2D2 image.

Posted in: Random | 4 Comments »

Older Entries
Newer Entries

Categories

Authors

Archives

advertisement

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008