Posted on January 10th, 2013 by Nicole Kobie
3M’s 84in multitouch display: (several) hands on
3M clearly thinks bigger is better: the centerpiece of its stand at CES 2013 in Las Vegas is a massive 84in, 1080p multitouch display, set up as a table larger than most people eat dinner on.
The new prototype is the biggest in 3M’s lineup of projected capacitive technologies — the same systems used in smartphones — and the dimensions aren’t the only impressive number about the massive multitouch display.
Like its smaller-but-still-rather-huge 42in sibling, it features 60-point multitouch. That means it can interpret 60 fingers’ input at once, so many people can work on collaborative projects. Most tablets do well to handle ten, and 3M’s giant also features palm recognition, so you won’t cause trouble if you rest one hand on the surface while spinning and tapping with the other.
3M only makes the hardware, leaving the software for the buyer to sort out — its massive displays are already used in retail, museums and restaurants. They can run Windows 7 and 8, Mac OS X or Linux, and most buyers tend to overlay an app for ordering food, marketing products, or in the case of the 84in on show at CES, teaching science at a museum.
The GestureWorks software allowed the many people crowded around the tablet to explore ideas on cards, tapping them to open up more detail, rotating them to get a better view, and sliding them off to the side when finished.
The 46in tablet had a lovely mapping app, which showed New York at different times throughout its history (beautiful and captivating as it was, a map of CES’ multiple halls would have been a tad more useful than a city 4,000km away 100 years ago).
The 84in table display made the 46in look insignificant by comparison — 3M really shouldn’t have had left them right next to each other — but the smaller system’s display was much sharper and cleaner. That’s because the sensor 3M uses for its 46in and smaller displays can’t conduct as far as 84in, meaning the company had to use microwires through the glass to make it work. Those wires are disappointingly visible up close, especially on solid colours, but will allow 3M to make displays up to 110in in size.
While the 84in is set up as a tablet, 3M actually markets them as displays. As they’re only a few inches thick, they can be embedded into tables and countertops to be used flat as well — which is a bit more useful for the 84in, as reaching the top would be problematic for us shorter folks if it was hung at eye level.
The 84in multitouch display is a proof of concept rather than a product. Pricing isn’t yet available, although a 3M spokesman suggested anyone with enough money could certainly get their hands on one. The 46in version, a 1080p LED that also features 60-point multitouch, costs about $6,500, while smaller versions designed to be used as desktop displays are available for $1,200.
Tags: 3M, CES 2013, display, touchscreen
Posted in: CES 2013
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
One Response to “ 3M’s 84in multitouch display: (several) hands on ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- CES 2013
- cloud computing
- From Gmail to Hotmail
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- MWC 2013
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Web
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement






January 10th, 2013 at 11:15 pm
Like the idea of this but would it not be better if it was a higher resolution eg 3840×2160 or even higher (especially with the 84″ model