Posted on September 7th, 2012 by Sasha Muller
Samsung Galaxy Camera review: first look
Windows 8 was the OS on everyone’s lips at IFA 2012, but Google’s Android OS popped up in the most unusual places. In addition to its range of Windows 8 tablets, Samsung embraced its eccentric side and unveiled its Android 4.1-powered snapper, the Galaxy Camera.
At first glance, you’d be forgiven for not noticing anything unusual – it looks just like a smart, stylish compact camera. The white plastic body flares out towards the hand-hold, which is textured with grippy plastic, and the overall build feels pleasingly solid. Around the front, the 23mm, F2.8 lens has a maximum zoom of 21x, and is partnered with a 16.3mp BSI CMOS sensor.
Tumble the Galaxy Camera in the hands, and you’ll notice there’s a distinct lack of buttons on show. Look to the rear and you’ll soon see why: the entire back of the camera is dominated by a 4.77in, 1,280 x 720 pixel touchscreen, and Google’s Android 4.1 OS, aka Jelly Bean, takes the reins.
It’s entirely unconventional, but in practice it works rather well. Thankfully, the 1.4GHz quad-core processor keeps Android 4.1 feeling seriously nippy – after all, you don’t want to be waiting around for your camera to take a picture – and the camera app puts a variety of preset picture modes just a dab of a finger away, while the button on the left of the screen makes it quick and easy to record 1080p HD video clips.
The possibilities are striking: take a handful of snaps, and you can edit them directly in Photoshop Touch, or any one of the several photo editing apps on the Play Store. And thanks to the Galaxy Camera’s built-in 3G, 4G, dual-band WiFi and Bluetooth 4 wireless connectivity (not to mention the integrated GPS), it’s possible to share your photos on social networks or upload directly to the photo sharing site of your choice.
And even if you’re out of reach of a nearby 3G or WiFi network, there’s no lack of storage. With 8GB of internal storage, and a microSD card slot, there’s plenty of scope for storing oodles of photos and videos.
Samsung’s Galaxy Camera is set to land sometime in October, with a suggested retail price of £400. Our review sample should be landing in the next few weeks, so keep an eye on PC Pro for the full low-down on this curious Android-powered snapper.
Tags: Android, Galaxy Camera, samsung
Posted in: Hardware, Just in, Random
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
7 Responses to “ Samsung Galaxy Camera review: first look ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- CES 2013
- cloud computing
- From Gmail to Hotmail
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- MWC 2013
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Web
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement












September 7th, 2012 at 6:33 pm
That’s got to be a typo – £400 for a compact camera? At that price they are competing with some of the best compacts around -Canon G12, Fuji x10, etc.
September 7th, 2012 at 9:32 pm
I was just thinking the opposite. The specs are the same as a high end mobile, normally around £400 anyway, plus a ‘proper’ camera.
September 8th, 2012 at 10:12 am
Now get Nokia to try this with the Pureview 41 mpix sensor and software coupled with a large F 1.8 Carl Zeiss zoom Lens and Nokia could be onto a winner.
September 9th, 2012 at 8:02 am
I think I’ll just buy a decent macro lens for my DSLR…
September 13th, 2012 at 12:13 am
DSLR and compact cameras cater to different users.
Assuming Ben is right about the specs (I wouldn’t know) the big issue here is whether an Android screen makes a reasonable substitute for a traditional camera control system. It *would* make networking a lot easier, but screen-based controls might not work for many photographers.
September 17th, 2012 at 5:21 am
Greetings! Veгy helpful aԁѵіce іn thіѕ particular pоѕt!
It is thе little chаngеs that makе the most importаnt сhangеs.
Many thanks fοг sharіng!
September 18th, 2012 at 2:13 pm
that’s not usually camera we seen around the corner shop, it’s must be tablet with SLR lens