<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP Spectre XT review: first look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/</link>
	<description>Blogging in the real world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:14:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-1005589</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-1005589</guid>
		<description>price slashed to less than £600, is this now good value ?  (price slash probably indicates its to be replaced...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>price slashed to less than £600, is this now good value ?  (price slash probably indicates its to be replaced&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Clarkson</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-965848</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Clarkson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 10:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-965848</guid>
		<description>I agree, I wouldn&#039;t buy a laptop if it had less that 1000 vertical pixels.  My Galaxy Nexus almost has as many pixels as this.  What is going on in PC land - Apple are push display resolution, how is the Ultrabook specification not supporting a similar push.  I guess Intel don&#039;t build screens so don&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I wouldn&#8217;t buy a laptop if it had less that 1000 vertical pixels.  My Galaxy Nexus almost has as many pixels as this.  What is going on in PC land &#8211; Apple are push display resolution, how is the Ultrabook specification not supporting a similar push.  I guess Intel don&#8217;t build screens so don&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-872860</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-872860</guid>
		<description>This is a question not a comment. I want to buy this for my travelling daughter, who uses Adobe Photoshop professionally ... presumably if she connects the laptop to her high-quality monitor, she will get appropriately high definition resolution on the monitor: so the resolution on her little screen won&#039;t matter, because she would not use it for professional grahics anyway. Yes/No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a question not a comment. I want to buy this for my travelling daughter, who uses Adobe Photoshop professionally &#8230; presumably if she connects the laptop to her high-quality monitor, she will get appropriately high definition resolution on the monitor: so the resolution on her little screen won&#8217;t matter, because she would not use it for professional grahics anyway. Yes/No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-850537</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-850537</guid>
		<description>I was considering it to replace laptops in 60+ classrooms but the lower resolution kills that idea.  Still looking for a better option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was considering it to replace laptops in 60+ classrooms but the lower resolution kills that idea.  Still looking for a better option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-828280</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 02:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-828280</guid>
		<description>Messed up the sale by throwing in low resolution screen. I was going to order one until I saw the poor screen resolution that they threw in. They could have at least allowed people to upgrade to a higher screen resolution by paying more if they wanted a higher screen resolution. No option=loss of sale for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Messed up the sale by throwing in low resolution screen. I was going to order one until I saw the poor screen resolution that they threw in. They could have at least allowed people to upgrade to a higher screen resolution by paying more if they wanted a higher screen resolution. No option=loss of sale for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-827782</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-827782</guid>
		<description>If Apples Ipad has the Retina Display, then this presumably is HP&#039;s answer.....the cataract display! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apples Ipad has the Retina Display, then this presumably is HP&#8217;s answer&#8230;..the cataract display! <img src='http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-827746</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 09:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-827746</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agreeing with everyone else so far.

I&#039;m simply not interested in anything with less than 1000 pixels vertically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agreeing with everyone else so far.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m simply not interested in anything with less than 1000 pixels vertically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim2</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-827731</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 09:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-827731</guid>
		<description>+2.  With smartphones now sporting 700 pixels across their shortest dimension, 1,000px could be said to be a more than reasonable minimum for a laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+2.  With smartphones now sporting 700 pixels across their shortest dimension, 1,000px could be said to be a more than reasonable minimum for a laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-827206</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-827206</guid>
		<description>+1
I stopped reading as soon as I read &quot;Resolution has taken a step down, from 1,600 x 900 to 1,366 x 768&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1<br />
I stopped reading as soon as I read &#8220;Resolution has taken a step down, from 1,600 x 900 to 1,366 x 768&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2012/05/09/hp-spectre-xt-review-first-look/comment-page-1/#comment-827053</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 16:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/?p=51868#comment-827053</guid>
		<description>Spot on John. Yet another case of style over substance. 
I seem to have a choice of only Sony or Dell for my next laptop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on John. Yet another case of style over substance.<br />
I seem to have a choice of only Sony or Dell for my next laptop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
