Posted on June 23rd, 2011 by Jonathan Bray
Why is the cut-price Final Cut Pro X getting such bad press?

I had a briefing at Apple HQ about its new Final Cut Pro X video-editing application, and it all looked very impressive. The Apple rep had plenty of new features to talk about – the new magnetic timeline, full 64-bit support and automatic clip categorisation among others – and the demo ran, as most Apple demos do, without a hitch.
The price of the thing is what staggers the most. The product it succeeds – Final Cut Pro 7 – retailed at £800 when it was first release back in 2009. Now, only two years later, Apple has slashed that price ruthlessly: Final Cut Pro X will be available exclusively for download from the Mac App Store at only £180.
That’s a less than a quarter the price of its predecessor and undercuts Adobe’s Premiere Pro CS5.5 by £630. It seems that, not content with banishing Adobe Flash from its phenomenally successful mobile product portfolio, it’s now beginning to pull the rug from under its entire software pricing strategy. And in another surprising move, once you’ve bought the software you’ll be able to install it on multiple Macs – your iMac, your MacBook Pro 17in and your MacBook Air – if you so wish.
And yet Final Cut Pro 7 devotees are currently flooding forums with negative comments about the new version, and in the Mac App Store, the reviews are averaging a mere three stars. Criticisms range from serious moans about the inability to import and edit Final Cut Pro 7 projects, to gripes about the simplistic-looking presentation of the new application.
- “No support for previous projects!!?? So, my last nine years of work get tossed in the bin because of this?” says one commenter.
- “The oversimplification of the interface makes me feel like I’ve somehow lost a lot of precision and control,” moans another.
Further complaints focus on the lack of support for existing third-party plugins, missing output support for professional audio formats, stability issues, and there are countless others I don’t have space to feature in this short post.
Apple’s response to the question of importing old projects at the briefing was to either run the two applications side by side, or buy the software and hope for a third-party solution for the conversion and import of older projects. It has also promised improvements that will add more Pro features in the coming months.
That’s unsatisfactory, to put it mildly, but it’s the sort of “not our problem” response we’ve come to expect from Apple. Remember Steve Job’s “don’t hold it like that” comment?
So what is Apple really doing here? Perhaps the low price really is an attempt to shake up the market, and undermine Adobe’s profitability. Perhaps it’s a philanthropic gesture, bringing Pro level software down to a price where enthusiasts, and not only professionals, can afford it.
Or is Apple simply hoping to deflect attention from Final Cut Pro X’s deficiencies? We’ll deliver our verdict in a full review online very soon, but, low price or not, it seems Apple has made a mistake launching Final Cut Pro X in its current state.
Tags: apple, Final Cut Pro X, video editing
Posted in: Software
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
22 Responses to “ Why is the cut-price Final Cut Pro X getting such bad press? ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- From Gmail to Hotmail
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Web
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement





June 23rd, 2011 at 2:12 pm
I think the pricing makes total sense, more and more people have DSLRs that shoot beautiful 1080p video, and these days even a pretty bog-standard laptop has a reasonable amount of power for editing so this may be a way of bringing decent video editing to the masses. Of course to really do that they’d have to release a PC version too, which must be soon right?
June 23rd, 2011 at 2:28 pm
You don’t mention, that you don’t get all the utilities that came with 7 in that 180UKP price, some of those utilities now have to be bought separately.
Also, you can only install it on multiple machine IF IT IS NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE. If you are a business, you will need to purchase a copy for each employee / Mac that needs FCP X.
June 23rd, 2011 at 3:31 pm
Apple is gearing for the future. this is a world where the director dp and editor are one.this is a world where hollywood’s power is not as strong.it is a world where pro and non-pro exist in the same place. the dslr revoultion has changed the game the best and worst is yet to come
June 23rd, 2011 at 4:11 pm
To coin a phrase, “are we sure we’re dealing with the real issue here?”
If I’d bought a product for £800 and then the developer reduced the price to £180, I’d not be a happy bunny either!
The strategy of having high priced “pro” versions and low cost “consumer” versions is becoming increasingly untenable – as the version count mounts, it gets harder and harder to add meaningful new features to “pro” and competition forces you to move more and more of the feature set from “pro” to “consumer”. Eventually, only snobbery (”I am a pro, so I must have the pro version”) is selling the expensive version.
Lets hope that Adobe soon gets the message and realises it could make more money if it sold its products at “consumer” prices!
June 23rd, 2011 at 5:11 pm
“Lets hope that Adobe soon gets the message and realises it could make more money if it sold its products at ‘consumer’ prices!”
Check into Premiere Elements… the tasks consumers need to do, without the pricetag or learning curve of a full pro-level editor. There’s also Premiere Express, for even simpler in-browser edits.
jd/adobe
June 23rd, 2011 at 5:25 pm
ProX makes sense if you’re one of the masses who makes YouTube videos for Bob’s World of Mattresses – but for a professional, there’s no option but to stay where we’re at. In an actual post facility (tvmanonline.com), about 65% of business comes from updating past projects. If upgrading throws out everything we’ve done in the past five years, then it doesn’t make any sense. And as for having an actual “Pro” version, it’s not snobbery considering all of the tools that were originally included – and most definitely used on a daily basis – not to mention the wide array of plug-in purchases that are no longer valid. Eventually buying plug-ins to get this version to where it’s actually usable will cost so much more than the original Pro version, possibly even to the tens of thousands…
June 23rd, 2011 at 5:44 pm
It’s a bit of a joke really. A hokey compromise for people who use iMovie but want to be classed as professionals. It’s utter garbage, not being able to open FCP 7 projects is a joke, as is the lack of XML and OMFI support. Having “Export to Facebook” as an option explains it all really.
Not happy at all to be honest, while the background rendering etc is pretty good, it removes any ability to be precise and meticulous; the two main intuitions of an editor. This will not revolutionise professional editing, it will only make it more accessible to the general public. As a result, there is nothing professional about it whatsoever.
Can I have my money back plez? I’ll stick to FCP 7 where I can do the things normal editors do…
June 23rd, 2011 at 5:45 pm
Oh, and you can’t even run FCP X and FCP 7 side by side…so apple are talking nonsense
June 23rd, 2011 at 8:19 pm
This is the kind of stunt that can ruin apple. Not much different than not having Flash on their mobile devices. Is there a dot missing on the dice over at apple?
June 23rd, 2011 at 10:20 pm
The broadcast pros are upset because not only is FCP-x not yet fully featured to replace version 7, but Apple took away all of seven and the entire bundled FCS suite of apps; you can’t buy it as of yesterday, it is EOL, gone, finito. While the version 7 and FC suite you own today didn’t disappear in a puff of smoke, you’re stuck now and can’t add any more seats of your mainstay program. Meanwhile, FCP-X can’t take in broadcast tape, and don’t let Jobs tell you tape is dead; in broadcast, it is very much alive, and people using v.7 have specific hardware to ingest and output to tape with precision… all gone with X.
Apple put out a consumer-oriented core product in X, and my guess is it hopes that over time it can add back the missing pro elements it took away, or that third party providers will do that, and eventually we’ll have all the functionality we had in v.7. But people that make their living at editing, on the high end, where Apple owned 58 percent or more of the market, can’t USE X in it’s present form. You won’t see the Coen Brothers or Walter Murch edit an Oscar winner on FCP-x, because it’s no question sexy sportscar, but it is missing the engine and transmission. And tires. And steering wheel……and….
June 24th, 2011 at 12:55 am
I’ve been working in post production for 20 years, editing for the last 15.
I’ve worked on every type of prime time show know to man and his dog. I mostly use Avid and Adobe. There is a reason why these products are expensive. They work, and are industry standard in every country. Most prime time shows are made using avids. Final cut is fine as a stand alone work station. Personally, I would trust it with more than 3-4 work stations on it, working together.
Fcp, when it first came out, it was a real game changer….. But what we didnt realise was that it slowly killed off editor daily rates, (including mine).
Guys were coming along in drones thinking they were editors because they used fcp (including post houses) and they undercut seasoned avid editors. Fcp undercut Avid and there was/is a massive shift in editor daily rates and post rates ever since. from 5 years ago to now. We were making double before fcp came out, seriously!
Now the tables are turning back… Most production managers now realise that cheaper doesn’t mean better… And this includes post facilities too (fcp)
With this fcpx release, this consumer toy, it will put serious pro editors back into the game with higher fees (we hope!) and will even force fcp die hards to consider jumping to avid or adobe. Leaving the consumer market, to well, consumers. Thanks Apple x
I’ve played with fcpx, and a pro editor can’t seriously charge normal editor rates to clients with this toy. Apart from mistakenly being named fcpx, instead of iMovie pro, which is essentially what it is. It simply doesn’t play nice with any of the big boys in the industry including it’s older brothers.
Maybe when/if they fix it up and add professional tools to it… Perhaps it may be able to compete? Until then…. It hasn’t got a chance in hell.
Good luck Steve! You have just turned away a massive pro market share, simply by letting that iMovie bloke talk himself into upgrading FCP for you. Because he worked well with imovie, doesnt mean it’ll work with the professionals. Your loosing it fella… Time to get grounded again.
Cheers
Ps, I own 8 Avids & 7 fcp’s all on mac pros.
June 24th, 2011 at 6:39 am
So Apple shaft there customs again!
June 24th, 2011 at 3:30 pm
FANTASTIC – FinalCutProX – What a joy and yes it is aimed specifically at video producers like me.
FACT 1 – FCP is a fantastic bells and whistles app that has been getting long in the tooth for a while and although very precise is slow to use.
FACT 2 – Apple have been progressively moving their offer from the specialist creative industries to the mass market since the success of the first iMac.
FACT 3 – Ripple, Apple’s approved FCP training provider, and who have had access to PCPX early in order to develop some tutorials in advance of the launch, anticipated needing to accommodate up to 50,000 hits on their website on launch day. Their servers crashed when 1.2 million enquirers tried to log into the site within the first 3 hours of the Apple FCPX launch.
So what does that tell you about where the market is and how Apple have got it absolutely right. Yes if I was a high end Pro editor I’d be looking for another app supplier but I guess that Apple would rather be making £180 from 1.2 million folk than £800 from 50,000. You do the numbers!
June 27th, 2011 at 9:13 am
Can we start playing “Spot the Fanboy” now…..
June 27th, 2011 at 10:57 am
I think Apple is doing exactly what’s right for apple. Traditionally the big market for Apple has been the professional creative industry. Now its market is phones, media players and tablets. If it can migrate 20% of these people to use Apple laptops it will create a significant additional revenue stream.
There is also a significant opportunity for pro-am and high end hobbyists who want to do high quality work but do not need to achieve full broadcast quality. Perhaps they are not trying to stuff Adobe but are saying “you can have the high-end but we’ll block you down market”.
June 28th, 2011 at 10:09 am
I’ve been using FCP7 (having upgraded version by version since we dumped the CMX) and just splashed out for a new Mac Pro, in anticipation of the X version. My existing macbook pro will not run 64bit.
What is really outrageous is the removal of version 7 from the shelves.
I am currently ingesting a 6 camera shoot — no multi-camera support on FCX….
Well, the old version goes like the wind on the new Mac Pro…
June 28th, 2011 at 11:03 pm
There are a few reports of refunds from Apple if the software is not suitable.
Is this not covered under the UK distance selling laws?
June 30th, 2011 at 2:39 pm
Love it or leave it. If you can’t deal with change, then, you shouldn’t be in business. I personally like the idea that Apple is trying to grab the Adobe people, but they need to get up to speed with Adobe’s After Effects and Encore. I would much rather use Apple stuff then Adobe. Adobe screwed me with version 5.0 as they would not give me a free upgrade as I purchased CS5 in March 2011 and CS5.5 came out right after that. I am sick and tired of the software company having the upper hand. Apple software just works.
June 30th, 2011 at 3:09 pm
How about taking taking Apple to task over the ‘Pro’ moniker, if it is eminently unsuitable for Pro’s?
It seems Apple is confused over where iMovie and FCPX stand in the market, I understood it that iMovie was the ‘Amateur’ movie editor?
July 9th, 2011 at 8:28 am
“this is a world where the director dp and editor are one”
Maybe in fairy world or la la land, but certainly not in the world of professional production, where people spend years polishing their craft.
July 12th, 2011 at 9:55 am
Another master stroke from Apple!! I’m sure they must have some kind of precognition department! They really understand
How markets develop. Editing is becoming a more mass market and boom, Apple produce the perfect “App for that”..
December 19th, 2011 at 9:22 pm
@Bob That’s a poor attitude. “Love it or leave it” is almost a fools statement IMO.
I’m with Wilbert on the use of “pro”. Call it Final Cut Elements or Artist or Essentials (or some other similar label that indicates that it’s not up to the Pro standard). How can you say they nailed it when so many of their previous customer base is unhappy? Also, “Apple software” does not always just work. iMovie, at least recent editions, have been barely disguised turds in my opinion- at least if you want to do anything beyond the 5 most basic/common tasks.