Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on January 13th, 2011 by Barry Collins

Nothing fair about “fair-use” policies

Smartphone keypadsThis is the problem when I’m out of the office for the PC Pro podcast: there’s nobody to get irrationally angry when my colleagues say something moronic.

Step forward David Bayon and Darien Graham-Smith, who claimed that T-Mobile’s decision (now partially reversed) to cut “fair use” data caps to 500MB was essentially “fair” – it was just the way T-Mobile presented it that was the problem.

Sorry chaps, but you’re wrong. Hideously, grossly, sleep-with-your-wife’s-mother-behind-her-back wrong.

T-Mobile’s argument – partially supported by the PC Pro Two, as they shall henceforth be known – is that anything more bandwidth-chomping than basic browsing should be performed on a Wi-Fi connection.

Let me remind all concerned that these are mobile phones – the word makes up 75% of T-Mobile’s name for God’s sake. If I only wanted to watch video, use Spotify, download a podcast or upload photos when I was within spitting distance of a Wi-Fi network, I wouldn’t bother with a sodding smartphone. I’d use my laptop – it’s far better for all those jobs.

I paid a couple of hundred quid for an iPhone and thirty-odd quid a month to my network precisely to enjoy the multimedia benefits the smartphone brings. If all I wanted was to make calls, read email, and browser the occasional webpage, I could do it on a Nokia No-Name 8700 on a £10 a month tariff.

The mobile networks have sold us these all-singing, all-dancing smartphones, weaned us on to expensive all-inclusive monthly tariffs, and now want to take away the free drinks. And not even in an up-front way, but in a sneaky change the Ts&Cs and hope they don’t notice way.

Perhaps if T-Mobile et al spent a little less on ridiculous, celebrity-filled TV adverts telling us “life is for sharing” and invested more money in a network that was actually fit for sharing, it wouldn’t have to trim its “fair-use” policy in the first place.

Tags: , , ,

Posted in: Rant

Permalink

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

21 Responses to “ Nothing fair about “fair-use” policies ”

  1. Andy Walker Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 11:47 am

    Spot on, couldn’ty agree with you more. They sell these phones with roaming ability then complain when we use it !!!

     
  2. paul standing Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 11:55 am

    Well said. I have shelved my decision to buy a smartphone and will leave it there till the networks invest in the necessary infrastructure.

     
  3. Matt Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    This is the point I, and several others, were trying to make on the T-Mobile forum.
    the communication from TM was also dreadful, with the phone staff, shop staff, twitter team and press office all having different versions of the policy.
    As it stands, I’ll eb leaving TM at the end of March, and probably heading to 3, where they seem to understand about mobile data….

     
  4. Neil Warrington Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 1:40 pm

    A Smartphone without data is just a phone.
    I pay extra for the W’n'W Plus 3Gb limit because I often go over 1Gb.
    T-Mobile have graciously allowed me to keep what I pay for – but why not allow other people to use their phones as they were intended?

     
  5. Jim Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    Cant agree more, not only that but 500MB is hardly “fair use” nowadays. I’d not consider excessive use until I hit over 3GB.

     
  6. Tim Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 3:06 pm

    With a USB stick, they charge £15 per month for 3GB. Why don’t they offer a larger data allowance as an extra, rather than pretending 500MB is unlimited?

     
  7. David Bradbury Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 4:01 pm

    The following email from my account manager when I asked her about the new limit. Guess we’ll lose out when (if) we renew our 40 contracts in August.
    Have a smile at the sign off at the end of her email :-)

    Hi David

    The data allowance isn’t going to change for existing customers unless they renew, so I wouldn’t worry about it.

    There’s no news on the SonyEricsson Xperia Arc yet, as soon as there’s any news I’ll contact you.

    Regards

    Name removed
    Business Account Support
    T-Mobile
    TEL: 44 (0) 8454 number removed
    Voted the best mobile network for overall quality of ‘customer experience’ and best for ‘value for money’
    (Independent Communication Management Association “Communications In Business” survey 2008)

     
  8. John Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 4:15 pm

    I was always amazed that ISPs and mobile networks have been able to get away with describing as “unlimited” products with clearly defined limits. Maybe T-Mobile were using the same logic and redefining 3GB as 500MB….

    If heavy users are a problem then surely the solution is either clearly defined limits at the time the contract is signed, or to charge per MB. Rather than “Unlimited” the could say “3GB – more than 95% of our users ever use” and actually be honest with their customers.

    Personally I think per MB charging is the way to go – but it’s clearly more profitable to charge for an “up to 3GB” service even if the user only downloads 50MB a month. The nature of wireless communications mean that it’s inherently a shared medium so it’s only right that the heaviest users should pay proportionately.

     
  9. Mark Thompson Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 9:28 pm

    Does T-Mobile really think 17MB a day is unfair?

     
  10. Alan Robertson Says:
    January 13th, 2011 at 9:59 pm

    Well said, Barry – totally agree with you!

     
  11. Christopher Bridge Says:
    January 14th, 2011 at 1:20 pm

    I’ve got a rather good T-Mobile £10pm deal with 1GB limit. Not that I can actually get close to utilizing that limit however, due to the poor coverage and speeds which make doing anything bandwidth intensive (e.g. video) out of the question, except at home on my wifi connection..

    This recent headline makes me want to push my smart-phone bandwidth usage more, in spite.

     
  12. Arek Says:
    January 14th, 2011 at 1:40 pm

    In defence of T-Mobile, last time I checked (a few months ago) they at least didn’t charge users for going over the limit (unlike most – if not all – other networks).

     
  13. Steve Cassidy Says:
    January 14th, 2011 at 3:29 pm

    My satnav broke today; so I turned on all the smartphone bits on the iPhone and tried to actually find my way along the edge of that little known remote byway, the M25… and couldn’t get a 3G connection to download the maps. Nor would it give me any more than a “near london” location fix, maps or no maps.

    It really is about time these companies were given a proper yank on the chain (and I know, there are better satnav apps for the iPhone. Curiously, the one i spent real money for at the App Store, won’t install. This is my fault, so they say. I say: Hello TomTom)

     
  14. Mark Says:
    January 15th, 2011 at 9:28 pm

    The advertising standards agency need to get grow some adult teeth and deal with the absurdity of all this “unlimited” nonsense. The ASA are utterly spineless. The networks are desperate to advertise “unlimited” when we all know they can’t supply that so they use “fair use” weasel words to get out of it.

    The ASA should force them to put the actual data upfront in all advertising, and make it part of the contract, same as the inclusive minutes and texts.

    In Dec I signed up for a TMobile contract because of the data included and was almost very angry. Fortunately I believe they’ve now backed down from their changes for existing customers.

     
  15. Darren Says:
    January 16th, 2011 at 8:39 am

    I started using T-Mobile for internet when I moved into our new house ‘cos the phone connection here is appalling – and no sign of BT infinity, (you wouldn’t believe we’re only about 2 miles from the major town/tourist location of Ludlow – God knows what some of the international visitors think when they visit Ludlow and only get 2mbps connection).

    I got to admit this internet connection works superb, probably even faster than my Virgin media connection I had in Warrington which is really surprising!

    However with this new decision to cap the broadband at 500mb, I’ll have to go and get a phone line. Hopefully BT hurry up and get off their backside and install FTTC or FTTP to Ludlow.

    As for using the internet on the go with my smartphone I don’t use T-Mobile, I have a HTC HD2, and I use GiffGaff. For just over a year now this superb phone company have been offering everyone free – yes absolutely free! mobile broadband, with no caps on it. Also as they use the O2 network you get 3G connection in most places. Every so often they say they’re going to charge for it, but even if they did that wouldn’t bother me, they have a superb “Goody bag” which offers 300 minutes, unlimited texts and internet for just £10 a month. GiffGaff are a proper hidden gem, the only reason I don’t use them instead of T-Mobile for my internet in the home is because your not allowed to put the sim card into a mobile dongle, but seeing as they are being really fair to their customers and allowing unlimited usage of internet in smartphones I can’t really complain about this restriction.

    GiffGaff are an absolute gem of a company, a superb hidden mobile phone company that more people should be aware of. In addition to this GiffGaff also have a rewards system that pays you to help people who are having problems with their phone, or pays you to refer people to GiffGaff, so even though it’s costing £10 a month most of the time you easily make more than this back in rewards.

     
  16. Charlie Says:
    January 17th, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    “A Smartphone without data is just a phone”

    So make a phone call! Shock Horror!!!

     
  17. Mr Vaio Says:
    January 20th, 2011 at 8:09 am

    T-Mobile’s other half, the “wife” – Orange told me that when I bought their Mobile Broadband business package, that I should have known (!should have known!) that the speed may not be to expectation – as in actual 3G! In the end, as long as I was able to connect, in 2G, they had fulfilled their side of the contract. As most of us know, 2G is worse than the old Dial-Up modem! So here I was – arguing with support, that I specifically purchased a “Broad band” package and it purported to be for business use! It’s not just the cap, which in my case was unlimited, it’s the actual speed these packages claim. If BMW or Toyota sold a car that claimed a top speed of 200mph – it had better get up there; and they would not say in some small print, “speeds only apply on a downhill run.” These Networks need serious overhaul – in their advertising claims.

     
  18. Chris Gay Says:
    January 20th, 2011 at 9:36 am

    I’m not sure of the actual download rate, but if we assume 200 K.Bytes/sec, it equates to only being allowed to use your mobile for 41 mins per month, which is 41 min/44460 min. Is that a Fair Usage Mobile? Maybe they should advertise it as the 1 hour per month contract.

     
  19. Julian C Says:
    January 20th, 2011 at 11:58 am

    I agree with Barry completely here.

    I don’t mind a mathematician telling me that “infinity is countable”, that’s a logical nicety.

    Initially I objected when marketing people at drive makers realised they could immediately make their drives appear 2.4% or more bigger by deciding to use a decimal kilo (1000) rather than the 1024 everyone in the industry was otherwise using. “Easier for people to understand” they said – not when a 1MB file (1024×1024 bytes = 1,048,576 bytes) wouldn’t fit on a “1MB drive” (1,000,000 bytes).

    But using the term “unlimited” to mean anything other than what the word actually means is crass, deceitful and just plain lying.

    Does this retrospectively effect existing contracts? If so I can’t help but feel someone with the resources challenging these snakeoil hawkers is long overdue.

     
  20. Paul Says:
    January 20th, 2011 at 8:28 pm

    The Uk is on 3G, whilst others are rolling out 4G. Which we will be lucky to see in the next 5 years. If we had this now, the network would be available to support our requirements. 3 have been jumping up & down promoting their new network upgrades, then they have gone round tweaking it back down again. Reducing signal strength to an almost un-useable level. Last year it worked, this year it is flaky, to the point of falling over. CV34

     
  21. Tony Says:
    January 23rd, 2011 at 3:46 pm

    I am mercifully coming to the end of my T Mobile contract and will never darken their doorstep again. Two months into the contract they demanded £200 from me for the privilege of using their phone 20 miles from Dover – in France. Being a returning customer made no difference to them whatsoever. They “forgot” to tell me that voicemail calls would cost 10p per minute when I have hundreds of spare phone minutes available each month (no mention anywhere in the documents except in obfuscated language). And the idle gits in the shop hadn’t a clue how to help me upgrade the phone to Android 2.x. The customer service phonelines are staffed by script-reciting children. They won’t allow you to escalate a complaint – except if you put it in writing (that’s rich for a phone co) but they ring you back in reply.
    No wonder they got taken over. Anybody know a grown up provider?

     

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

* required fields

* Will not be published

Authors

Categories

Archives

advertisement

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010