Posted on January 6th, 2011 by Nicole Kobie
Is the Mac App Store the start of another revolution?
Apple’s Mac App Store opened its virtual doors today, and if it’s like any other Apple Store opening, hordes of fans will have flooded it to shop.
But is this an idea that’s going to take-off like the iPhone or sink like the Newton?
The store interface itself is as slick as anything designed by Apple, with much in common with the iPad App Store. One of the nicest features is the tabs along the top. While three offer ways to find and buy apps — featured, top charts and categories — the other two allow one click access to previous purchases and updates, which seems a handy organisational tool.
Annoyingly, you’ll need to upgrade to Snow Leopard if you haven’t already. And, you seem to need to verify payment before downloading, even for free apps (or at least I did, which might be because I’m using a different computer than normal). Once that’s sorted, clicking the “free” button or the item’s price kicks off the download. Be careful once you’re logged in with a valid credit card, though, as all it takes is one misplaced click to accidentally buy an app, which is how I came to own a copy of Courier.
Downloads take mere seconds, with a nice animated swoop sending your new software to the dock.
Unsurprisingly then, it looks good and is lovely to use. But is this really the way people will choose to buy software in the future?
Software choices
I wonder because many of the most popular downloads so far today are mind-boggling: StuffIt Expander, Pages, Twitter… even Solitaire. Were the Mac masses desperately awaiting an Apple-approved app to buy such apps? Because these seem like the sort of software you’d already have if you wanted it, given they’re all widely available online.
While a fair number of the 1,000-launch apps are for the Mac App Store only, much of the most downloaded software have long been available online for Macs, simply by heading to the developer’s website.
For example, Evernote is now available free on the Mac App Store. However, it’s long been free for Macs via the web. It’s hard to believe anyone choosing to use the notetaking software never found it appealing before today, but faced with a clean-and-easy interface instantly had the desire to download it. Maybe this is some weird launch day anomaly, where users download like mad just because they can (I did the same thing after my Kindle arrived, after all).
As our laptops editor Sasha Muller put it: “It’s like Steam. You buy things because you can, not because you need them.”
Either way, it’s proving to be a good move for Apple, with its own software making up over half of the top 12 grossing apps at the time of writing.
Its Aperture photo-editing package even managed to knock Angry Birds from the top spot. That software alone is worth upgrading to Snow Leopard to get your ticket in the door of the Mac App Store, as the photo editing software is normally priced at £173, but has been slashed to a ridiculous £44.99 for those inside Apple’s Snow Leopard walled garden.
There are other rewards to using the Mac App Store. Pages, Numbers and Keynote are £11.99 each, versus £72 for all three on the Apple UK web-based store. And iMovie, GarageBand and iPhoto are slashed to £8.99 each, from £46 for the package deal online. On top of the savings, there’s the added benefit of being able to pay just for the software you’re going to use. Any Mac user would be wise to upgrade to Snow Leopard just for those savings — it’ll be interesting to watch if installations of the latest OS jump after today.
As iLife comes pre-installed, it’s hard to believe most Mac Book owners don’t have a version of those already, but at least this makes upgrading to the 2011 versions in the store free and easy. On top of all that, there’s another benefit: anything you download can be automatically flipped to another computer if you upgrade to a new Mac, so no more hunting for discs or having to head back to every website just to reload a machine.
So it’s cheaper, easier for some, and can salvage your apps if your Mac Book dies. Considering Google already has its Chrome Marketplace and how unflinchingly we accept mobile apps stores — and even complain when we don’t have access to the best ones — don’t be surprised to see others following the lead of the Mac App Store soon.
Tags: apple, apps, Mac App Store
Posted in: Newsdesk
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
7 Responses to “ Is the Mac App Store the start of another revolution? ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- From Gmail to Hotmail
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Web
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement




January 6th, 2011 at 10:39 pm
There is a good point here about not having to buy all the applications in say iLife.
I bought the latest version of iPhoto today.I don’t need or want the others. Saved me a load of cash.
I also picked up the free version of AutoExpress sketchbook, which I had not seen before and is perfect for my needs.
Rather than relying on a hit or miss web search, it is now possible to browse competing applications in a unified interface. If I were a small developer I would see that as real chance to get my products in from of a wider audience.
January 6th, 2011 at 10:50 pm
Ubuntu has effectively had an app store (albeit all free) for a while. Not as slick though.
January 6th, 2011 at 11:50 pm
There is a huge convenience factor here for all application updates to be applied with one click. I am re-installing my apps for this reason alone.
I can see many advantages for both sellers and buyers to the app store approach. Admittedly Linux has been doing this for years with it’s repositories, but Apple has raised the bar, again!
January 7th, 2011 at 12:00 am
Sod
My earlier post should say
‘in front of’
Sorry.
January 7th, 2011 at 1:33 am
Why does Apple think that copying something that Linux has done for many years will help. It’s too late. It won’t matter now. Linux is based upon repositories which means that everything can be based upon other things easily without bundling or space wasting crap.
Linux is better. If you want this feature use Linux!
January 7th, 2011 at 1:34 am
This is hardly something new. Steam has, rather successfully been selling games in this way for a long time
January 10th, 2011 at 12:07 pm
It does not matter a jot that the Mac App Store is not a new idea.
End-users will take to it if it is a convenient way to purchase and update applications software – especially if the software is cheaper this way. Developers will take to it if it is a convenient and effective way to distribute their software.
The real test is whether the ‘big beasts’ (such as Microsoft and Adobe) decide to use it, and whether _their_ software – which is often ferociously expensive – is cheaper in the App Store than via retail channels.