Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

// Home / Blogs

Posted on September 6th, 2010 by Barry Collins

Five reasons why Apple’s earbuds aren’t that bad

iPod headphonesSometimes things become bad, just because received wisdom says they are. Windows Vista, James Blunt, Dan Brown novels – all victims of a sweeping change in public opinion that renders them as unfashionable as a bum bag on Gordon Brown, even though the quality of their output has remained largely unchanged.

Apple’s earbuds could be easily added to that list. It’s become something of a truism – both in PC Pro and the wider world – that the headphones supplied with Apple iPods/iPhones are as offensive on the ear as Janet Street-Porter with a megaphone. Well, I, for one am prepared to stand up for Apple’s white delights. I’ve owned an iPod/iPhone for five years or more, and I’ve never found a compelling reason to part with the headphones supplied in the box.

Here are five reasons why:

1. They don’t sound that bad

Yes, there’s no doubt that Sony or Sennheiser’s finest offer superior sound quality to the Apple earbuds, but most people simply won’t notice the difference. When you’re listening to your iPod with a backdrop of clattering Tube train or traffic-saturated high street, all those delicate subtleties offered by the more expensive models are drowned out anyway.

Even in pristine listening conditions, many people can’t tell the difference between Apple’s bog-standard buds and premium headphones. When asked to rate various types of headphone out of ten in our Real World Quality Test feature, our panel of 20 everyday consumers gave  Apple’s earbuds an average rating of 6.1 out of ten, only marginally behind a £180 pair of Sennheiser IE8 headphones, which scored 7.1.

In short, the Apple earbuds are “good enough” for most – which is why you still see their familiar white cable snaking out of the jacket of most people on the Tube.

2. They’re robust

In the five years or so I’ve owned an iPod/iPhone, I can’t recall having to throw away a single pair of Apple earbuds because the cable has frayed or the earbuds have disintegrated – unlike countless other pairs of in-ear headphones I’ve owned over the years.

3. They’re not THAT leaky

The best case for the prosecution against the Apple earbuds is that they have all the acoustic insulation of a washing machine. Indeed, this very morning on the way into work there was a girl who managed to alienate the entire carriage with the burble of beats emanating from her standard Apple earbuds.

There’s no doubt that Apple’s headphones would benefit from those rubber tips that seal the ear canal. But blaming Apple for leaky sound is like blaming next-door’s Doberman for not clearing up the number two it left on your drive this morning: the owner is to blame. Apple’s headphones don’t irritate fellow commuters, unless you have the iPod turned up to eardrum-perforating levels.

4. The jack doesn’t obstruct buttons

This sounds like a ridiculously trivial point, but it isn’t. I’ve lost count of the number of alternative headphones that have the jack (or tip, ring, sleeve connector, to give it its proper name) jutting out at 90 degrees, obscuring the iPod’s lock button or rendering an iPhone case impossible to use.  Apple is seemingly the only company to realise that a headphone jack that sits flush with the player isn’t always desirable.

5. They’re a fashion statement

There’s no doubt in my mind that part of the appeal of the Apple earbuds is that they identify you as an iPhone/iPod owner. That distinctive cable marks you out as a member of a premium club, in the same way as the Ray Ban logo on your sunglasses or a Nike swoosh on your trainers. I’ll wager that it’s the second biggest reason why brand-conscious teenagers (and if we’re being honest, some of us grown-ups) don’t ditch the earbuds, behind the inescapable advantage of them being free.

Tags: , , , ,

Posted in: Random

Permalink

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

38 Responses to “ Five reasons why Apple’s earbuds aren’t that bad ”

  1. Ben Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 1:23 pm

    Do they still come with those black foam covers or is that a thing of the past?
    The problem I ALWAYS had with the standard buds is they dont stay in my ear. They simply aren’t “grippy” enough, hence the “in-ear” ones being my headphone of preference

     
  2. Allister Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    You’re kidding, right? “Even in pristine listening conditions, many people can’t tell the difference between Apple’s bog-standard buds and premium headphones.” Where did you get that from? Anyone who can’t tell the difference probably doesn’t have the player switched on.

    Even the article you reference to back you up says the complete opposite to what you’re claiming. It says “but it seems that almost everyone can appreciate the difference between bog- standard in-box headphones and decent third-party replacements”.

     
  3. Tomasz Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 1:34 pm

    re point 3: yes they are THAT leaky. They are the bane of a commute of many people. I’m not saying they are the worst in this department but they are very bad. Instead of defending them perhaps you should ask yourself a question: If Apple so prides itself on delivering only the best in consumer technology, why are the earphones one area they chose to totally dismiss? Shouldn’t they make sure they cover all bases instead?

    Earphones with rubber-ear insulation like Sennheiser CX-300 give benefits to both – the listener and the people around him. Because of sound insulation, the listener doesn’t have to be raking up the volume to max levels to enjoy the music thus damaging his hearing and in effect the fellow commuters don’t have to subjected to whatever he’s listening due to decreased levels of volume resulting in no soundleak. It’s a win-win.

     
  4. james016 Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 1:50 pm

    I had to use them when my earphones died. They sounded horrible, they wouldn’t stay in my ear properly and most of all they hurt after about 2 mins of wearing them. In short, they are crap

     
  5. Rob E Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    I’m with Tomasz. Further to that, I’m wondering whether your panel of 20 everyday consumers had their aural canals bunged up with earwax or something. The Apple earbuds exhibit truly appalling sound quality. A pair of Sennheiser CX300s wipes the floor with them and, at considering they cost about £13 at your local Tesco’s, Apple should hang its head in shame for foisting such tat on us.
    As regards the fashion statement thing, if I see someone wearing them in public, I’m not likely to think of them as being in any sort of premium club, more that they’re wearing an “I’ve got an expensive Apple product in my pocket, feel free to mug me” sign around their necks.

     
  6. ian Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    “There’s no doubt in my mind” that number 5 is the main reason you don’t think there’s a difference.
    .
    The idea that any set of buds can rival a set of half-decent properly sealed iems is frankly ridiculous.

     
  7. Danny Thomas Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    In my experience, headphones are quite a personal choice. Because they sit so close to the ear canal, sound quality is more subjective than with speakers. Secondly, all ears are different and comfort varies. I think as a pair of ‘free’ headphones they do the job perfectly well and I keep a pair in my laptop bag as a spare. But they are not a patch on the BOSE pair I use by choice. What amuses me is the strong emotions that they seem to raise. Exactly the same could be said about the headphones I got with my Nokia Phone and the countless pairs I received with a variety of Walkmens through the 80’s and 90’s. The bundled headphones with any player are made to a budget and are not going to be great. For what they are, in my opinion, the Apple Buds are better than most, but for anyone who listens regularly, get a decent third party pair, they will sound better and be more comfy. But stop making a drama out of it.

     
  8. Rob E Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:12 pm

    @Danny Thomas. I take your point, but I do feel that a drama is warranted in this instance. If I send upwards on £200 on an iPod Touch, for example, I don’t want my first action to be to ditch the standard buds and go out and buy something third party. It strikes me that, given the numbers of units Apple sell, it would not be difficult for them to get a decent third party manufacturer to enter into an agreement to manufacture quality OEM in-ears at a super-cheap price to sell as standard with the iPod/iPhone.

     
  9. David Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    I’ve only ever had one pair of them and I thought they were crap. As it happens, they fairly quickly developed that usual earphone fault of one side stopping working (seems to be the plug isn’t strong enough).

    And why do Apple call them ‘earbuds’ – the normal term is ‘earphones’.

     
  10. Danny Thomas Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:28 pm

    @Rob E – I don’t particularly disagree. However, as a counterpoint. I have a really good BOSE set and I will discard the Apple buds however good they are. My real issue is that bundled buds have been rubbish for 30 years, but nobody got on Sony’s case about it to nearly the same degree. Apple seem to really polarise opinion. They are a commercial organisation that makes kit for profit. Some of it is good, some excellent and some not so good, why do so many people feel the need to vent so strongly?

     
  11. simon Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:34 pm

    Are you joking “Robust”? My Iphone 3GS earphones randomly just stopped working, they last about 9 months and then die, and I have gone through about 6-7 of them.

    I always used to replace at about £20-40 a time, this time though I just switched to another brand.

     
  12. David Wright Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:36 pm

    I can’t wear then, they seem to fall out about every second or third step and I am forever pushing them back in, a complete pain!

    My gf put my Sennheisers in the washing machine, so I replaced them with a cheap pair of Hama earbuds, the rubber grips on both of those are fine. I still hate earbuds/earphones of all types, but I put up with them, when walking the dog.

    To be honest, I can’t tell any difference in quality between the Apple, Sennheiser or Hama earphones, but there again, I only listen to podcasts and audiobooks, so the requirements are probably pretty low anyway.

     
  13. Phil Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    I dont dislike Apples buds because of received wisdom. I dislike them because I found them uncomfortable, dropping out of my ears frequently and are shamed by (what I paid at the time) £35 CX300s.

     
  14. Tomasz Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:42 pm

    @Danny Thomas I think you’re wrong. Bundled earphones needn’t be rubbish. Check out the earphones bundled with mp3 players or mobile phones by any other manufacturer, eg. Sony Ericsson Walkman branded mobile phones have been bundled with rubber isolations earphones for a long time now! They are not as good as your £90 BOSE headphones but people who can’t fork out for this expensive earphones needn’t have to either be stuck with low quality ear-damaging earphones have just parted with lots of cash for their iPods. A £15 more on the price of an iPod which would include CX-300 grade hearing experience would go a very long way and would benefit all.

     
  15. Phil Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Also why do you get the same earphones whether you buy a £50 shuffle or a £200 iPod Touch? I know someone who bought a £200+ Sony player and got some quality buds in the box.

     
  16. Rob E Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 2:52 pm

    @Danny. You’re right, people do like to vent about Apple. Often with valid reason, more often without. Given that there are about half a dozen iPods of one type or other in my household, I’d like to think I’m in the former camp.
    Yup, traditionally the bundled buds provided by any manufacturer have been a bit pony. My point is that, given that decent buds are so very cheap nowadays, there’s no longer an excuse to be shipping a ‘Premium’ product that, in all other respects, oozes quality, with such pony earbuds.
    Y’never know, if enough of a fuss is kicked up on a public forum about this issue, we might see a change? Hmmm. I’ll not hold my breath though.

     
  17. ian Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    Apple commits many, many sins, but I’m not sure bundling rubbish buds is one of them. There is an argument that anyone who cares about sound quality is already going to have some proper ‘phones, and will not appreciate paying a premium for ‘phones they would never use anyway.. Mind you, what anybody who cares about SQ is doing buying an iPod in the first place is open to question (no custom EQ).
    .
    With the honourable exception of Sony, pretty much nobody provides good ‘phones as standard – so it’s not as if Apple are unusual in this respect.
    .
    That said there’s not much excuse when you consider ‘phones like the CX300 – which though not to my taste and still well respected, and very cheap.
    .
    Ideally all manufacturers should offer a choice of ‘phones, including none.

     
  18. Dave Robinson Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 3:39 pm

    The worst feature of the Apple ear-buds, like so many others of that type, is that the sound quality changes according to how tightly they are fitted into or pressed against the ear. My Sennheiser headphones, although large, do not change the quality of their sound whether pressed against the head or not.

     
  19. mcviracca Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 5:02 pm

    I’m surprised no-one has mentioned this yet but one of the reasons I still use my bundled earphones is because of the built-in controls. I really like the convenience of being able to change volume, pause, skip forward, skip backwards, fast forward, rewind and also answer calls on my earphones, and I really miss it when I use a better sounding set of earphones.

    Anyone know of a good sounding pair that replicates all these functions?

     
  20. Muck Says:
    September 6th, 2010 at 6:48 pm

    I take offence to this post because they are awful. The bleed is appalling. I used them for about a week because of the controls and the mic attached but after hearing how much other people could hear when I had them on 3 quarter volume I quickly ditched them for Sennheisers. Apple are great but their earphones are no better than a £10 pair

     
  21. LogiCub Says:
    September 7th, 2010 at 8:46 am

    If Apple increased the quality of their included earphones, then Apple would increase the cost of the products that they come with.

    I, and plenty of other people, are perfectly happy with what comes in the box and would rather not pay an extra premium for higher quality earphones that I wouldn’t/couldn’t appreciate.

    If sound quality from a portable music player is that important to you, then go spend some proper cash and get the ideal pair of earphones for yourself. Ones that feel comfortable, ones that offer the quality and controls that you’re after. Everyone’s different, by including a reasonable, basic pair in every box, Apple gives you the opportunity to go and upgrade to what you want, rather than forcing an expensive pair on everyone. And if it’s that important to you, then you probably already have that perfect pair of headphones from your previous music player!

     
  22. Barry Collins Says:
    September 7th, 2010 at 9:17 am

    Thanks for all the comments.

    In response to some of the comments made:

    1. I’m not suggesting the iPod earbuds are better than premium Sennheiser, Sony models – merely that they’re “good enough” for most people.

    2. mcviracca makes an excellent point – the in-line controls are another good reason to stick with Apple’s buds.

    3. If the quality of the earphones was harming Apple’s brand/reputation for high quality products, the company would have done something to remedy the situation by now. The fact the earbud design has remained largely unchanged since the year dot suggests this isn’t a common source of complaint among Apple customers. Indeed, as our own Real World Quality Test feature showed, the quality of the player has a far greater impact on people’s perception of audio quality than the headphones.

    4. If you don’t like them, and I can perfectly understand why some/many people don’t, you can always buy a new pair!

    Barry Collins
    Online Editor

     
  23. Kane Says:
    September 7th, 2010 at 9:17 am

    They don’t fit in my ears, at least not without surgery to the buds or my lugs. A step too far on either count.

    So sound quality or other factors are irrelevant.

     
  24. Tomasz Says:
    September 8th, 2010 at 9:56 am

    @Barry Collins:
    Yes, the users may love the sound of their earbuds but what about the people around them? Beucase of their big leak levels the users on the tube usually rack them up to volumes which the wholle carriage can hear but should they? It’s very egoistic to say: I love my earbuds cause they sound nice, I don’t care if I’m subjecting everyone around me to my music.

    If they were rubber insulated, the music wouldn’t leak and everyone would be happy.

     
  25. Fiqqer Says:
    September 8th, 2010 at 10:19 am

    I would think that one of the reasons people put up with the awful earphones is because of the remote facility. When, at an Apple stoer, I asked for a different remote so that I could plug my own headphones or better headphones they looked at me agog.

    A lot of people stick with the standard headphones because of this convenience and the extra cost; not because the sound quality is fine. It is not fine – it is bad and distorted, which at the sound levels they are played on on the tube must be damaging users hearing.

    Apple must be having a laugh using the same headphones for a £50 ipod as a £200 device.

    I have had better stock headphones.

    It doesn’t cost much to get a significantly better headset – both for the user and for others sharing a public transport.

     
  26. LogiCub Says:
    September 8th, 2010 at 12:19 pm

    @Fiqqer – “Apple must be having a laugh using the same headphones for a £50 ipod as a £200 device.”

    Exactly why must Apple be laughing? Are you under the impression that that extra £150 you’re spending is going towards increased sound quality? You may have noticed that the feature set you get with a £200 iPod is where that money goes…
    I can’t back this up, but I’m pretty certain that the maximum quality output is the same between a nano and a touch…

     
  27. Jenny Says:
    September 8th, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    “They’re not THAT leaky”??? Oh but they are. My decision to buy an iPod was pretty much based on the need to drown out other people’s leaky, tinny white headphone noise while trying to read on the train.

     
  28. Tony Says:
    September 8th, 2010 at 9:40 pm

    Lets be honest, you get such a rubbish sound from any iPod that the tacky headphones they supply would make such little difference.

    Having worked sound desks and in recording studios for 20 years I would not insult my ears with an iPod. It is all summed up in point 5 heading.

     
  29. Jake Says:
    September 9th, 2010 at 4:36 pm

    Hey I’m an audio professional and work with expensive esoteric audio systems, but hey when listening to aac files or mp3’s good quality cans will for one show u how bad the audio source is.. Apple earphones..I like em, simple and appropriate.. And the cable is so tactile!
    Just don’t wash ur hair and not swab your ears, or the water will kill them…
    Incidentally, headphones with rubber seals are often described as closed headphones, separation is great, sound quality suffers… I’d describe these as semi open, allowing background noise thru, but more clarity and less low end problems….

     
  30. Fai Says:
    September 9th, 2010 at 4:51 pm

    They’re good enough for people who’ve never tried anything better – and once they do, they’d realise how absolutely backyard landfill rubbish they are.

    I’ve seen friends blare out the music at max volume from those type of earphones just so they can block out the outside noise. Without any kind of seal, ambient noise will just get in – and the sound from the earphones just get wasted on everyone else!

    The lack of seal also lends itself to being quite inefficient with transmitting sound into the listener’s ear.

    Properly sealed in-earphones allow you to listen at a lower volume whilst still experiencing the full sound without affecting other people. I’ve converted a number of people just by letting them try something better – and the sooner more people do so, the better it is for the rest of us in the public.

     
  31. Jonathan Says:
    September 9th, 2010 at 5:30 pm

    Saying it is not Apple’s fault they are leaky because it is the owner that sets the volume is wrong. Perfectly reasonable listening volumes still leak to annoying levels – the design has even got holes in it to let the sound leak out! I’ve a pair of £10 ear canal ‘phones that are a lot less leaky. It is Apple’s bad design that’s to blame.

     
  32. Simeon Beresford Says:
    September 9th, 2010 at 10:04 pm

    you lost me at Dan Brown

     
  33. Harry Lewis Says:
    September 9th, 2010 at 11:06 pm

    I bought Sennheiser rubber-lined buds NOT to save others from own my noise but to hear my podcasts in a noisy environment (gym) – I was bothered about the sound leaking IN not OUT.
    Barry says (post 22) you can always buy new ones. NOT for the current generation iPod Shuffle wiht controls on the cable; I’m guarding my second generation Shuffle lovingly, having destroyed its predecessor in a hand-wash. (Note: my Sennheiser buds survived that experience!)

     
  34. JoeRomero Says:
    October 4th, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    I totally agree with the author and do believe that Apple’s earbud’s get a bad rap. I am somewhat in the “earbud” business as my company makes Breppies, which are earbud covers. I like to observe how many people wear different types of earbuds and I would say that over 60% of people still use Apple. I would also tell you that most people that buy “aftermarket” earbuds, unless they are shelling out $80, hate those earbuds even more, because most are made by the same Chinese manufacturers. You can see the Gizmodo article http://brepps.com/secret-scam-cheap-earbuds. Personally, we have a lot of people who hated Apple earbuds start loving them again after they started using our product http://brepps.com. I am not convinced that most people can even differentiate the true low bass and high frequencies enough to truly make a judgement on sound. I believe like someone else said, it all comes down to personal preference.

     
  35. Mg Says:
    November 2nd, 2010 at 9:27 am

    haha, get some ultimate ears and you’ll hear the difference. i used to use apple ear buds and i had to replace them ALOT due to them breaking. the connector breaks when it bends in your pocket and the rubber band around the bud comes free and ends up in your ear, apple did replace my pair 3 times tho!

     
  36. Johnny Says:
    November 13th, 2010 at 5:25 am

    U must b really kidding me… not that bad?? I ve had an iphone for 6 months and my apple ear-buds have literally fallen appart. For a company like apple to do such appaling quality products is nothing short of shocking. Just because they have a big name do they think people will not notice how bad some of their products are? I know it came for fre with the iphone, but that’s not an excuse!
    But it happened to Phillips and it will happen to Apple. This is not hit and miss. This is miss one and wait for the consecuences. Do Apple have a massive fan base? Yes they do. Does brand loyalty exist? I suppose, to some extent. But remember it only took Dan Brown a bad sequel after a blockbuster to loose his “brand loyalty”. Will it happen too Apple? … it is happening already…
    And now I’m off, doing headset shopping , but I felt I so had to comment on this article…

     
  37. Gary Says:
    December 2nd, 2010 at 11:05 am

    Reason no. 2 “They’re robust” is not true. Barry Collins must be in a small minority of buyers who have had earphones that lasted a reasonable time. In my experience they are only good for a few weeks then the sound in the right earpiece starts to deteriorate. I’m now on my third pair of Apple earphones and the sound has deteriorated in the right again which is why the first and second pair were replaced.

     
  38. Bilal Says:
    September 3rd, 2011 at 11:12 am

    I’m fine with the Apple earphones, and have been using them since my first iPod years ago.

    I do have a pair of ear canals(Sony EX32LP) but I only ever use them on planes now. I don’t get on with those types as I don’t like hearing my various internal sounds as well as the vibrations from walking(I have big feet), despite the sound quality(esp. bass) and insulation.

    I always use the black covers because I need to. They sound awful without them(devoid of bass) and don’t sit in my ear at all. I seem to be the only one, though. I’ve yet to see anyone else using them!

    I don’t care about sound leakage because I adjust the volume based on my surroundings so it’s just enough to hear without people noticing.

    The main reason I prefer them(although, truthfully, it’s not Apple’s earphones as such, just this particular type of earphone, regardless of manufacturer) is that I don’t need to remove them to listen to the outside world clearly, such as when crossing roads. I prefer practicality over sound quality when out and about.

    As for build quality, I have been through a few already but it’s always been my fault. Since treating them carefully, they’ve been fine.

    I bought some Sony Groove ED21LP’s as a possible compromise but they hurt my ears and I had to stop using them and am back with my Apple earphones.

     

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

* required fields

* Will not be published

SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010