Posted on July 30th, 2010 by Barry Collins
Richard Stallman: GNU do you think you are?

About 10 years ago, when I was just a junior reporter in my first stint at PC Pro, I interviewed Richard Stallman, the self-styled “software freedom activist” and GNU Project founder.
To say the interview didn’t go smoothly would be like saying there’s a small spot of bother between Israel and Palestine. About 10 minutes into the interview I asked him a question about Linux. Big mistake.
“There’s no such thing as Linux,” Stallman shot back, before forcefully explaining that referring to it as anything other than GNU/Linux was a grave personal insult because it failed to recognise his work on the GNU project.
So I wasn’t altogether shocked to read the following comment in an online Q&A with Stallman that was published this week on Reddit:
At the 1999 Atlanta Linux Expo, I was standing there chatting with you and a group of people. A very young boy (around 14 years old) very timidly approached you to thank you for your work and what you have done. He was obviously very intimidated and spoke only a couple of sentences, but unfortunately made the mistake of referring to “Linux” instead of “GNU/Linux”.
You ripped into that boy and tore him a brand new a*****e, and I watched as his face fell and his devotion to you and our cause crumpled in a heap. You destroyed that boy with your harsh words.
Someone in the FSF [Free Software Foundation] told me a year later that you had changed for the better and you were much calmer. My question to you now is: do you regret the harsh tone you’ve dished out to so many people over all that time?
Stallman’s answer denies all knowledge of the confrontation and suggests the questioner might have “exaggerated” it – which I very much doubt, as it sounds almost identical to the strip he tore off me.
In his defence, Stallman does admit he shouldn’t have behaved in such a manner, before stating:
I will try my best to keep my good humour as I explain that the system is GNU/Linux. You can help me succeed by joining in the work. If you make a point of calling the system “GNU/Linux” and explaining why, the error will gradually become less common.
Perhaps more people, journalists included, would be willing to give Stallman his due credit if he learned that manners – like his preferred type of software – cost nothing.
(Image courtesy of Daniel Villar Onrubia)
Tags: GNU/Linux, Linux, Richard Stallman
Posted in: Newsdesk
Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
8 Responses to “ Richard Stallman: GNU do you think you are? ”
Leave a Reply
Authors
- Barry Collins
- Chris Brennan
- Christine Horton
- Darien Graham-Smith
- Dave Stevenson
- Davey Winder
- David Bayon
- David Fearon
- Ewen Rankin
- Ian Devlin
- Jon Honeyball
- Jonathan Bray
- Kevin Partner
- Mike Jennings
- Nicole Kobie
- Sasha Muller
- Steve Cassidy
- Stewart Mitchell
- Stuart Turton
- Tim Danton
- Tom Arah
Categories
- About the bloggers
- Android App of the Week
- cloud computing
- Green
- Hardware
- How To
- iPhone App of the Week
- Just in
- Microsoft Office 2010
- Newsdesk
- Online business
- Random
- Rant
- Real World Computing
- Software
- View from the Labs
- Windows 7
- Windows 8
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
advertisement


July 30th, 2010 at 6:28 pm
In 2008 I had installed Ubuntu and finally made the switch to… GNU/Linux. Then I sent a mail (in French, my native tongue) to Stallman, telling basically “thank you for your work, without all your efforts I wouldn’t have been using Linux today” — the situation was sort of similar.
I got a nice reply (in French) in which he underlined that calling GNU/Linux only Linux was neither kind nor accurate, along, IIRC, with the link pointing to http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html He wasn’t angry at all, and I certainly didn’t get insulted. In fact was very kind of him to take the time to reply to a simple user who had nothing to contribute except a simple “thanks”.
This is just the personal experience of a simple, anonymous Ubuntu GNU/Linux user.
August 1st, 2010 at 9:54 am
Richard Stallman is a great mind and his work on the GNU project (which I first used under AmigaDOS) is great. The implementation of the GNU tools with the Linux Kernel certainly helped bring Linux, sorry, GNU/Linux to the position it has today.
The problem is, as well as being a great advocate for GNU/Linux and open systems, he is also the movements worst enemy.
For the idealists, like Stallman, open is king and everything else can go to hell.
For the average user, usability and interoperability is king and ideals can take a back seat.
That is one of the reasons I went from using GNU/Linux as my main operating system (2002 – 2006), to using OS X and later Windows Vista and Windows 7.
For a lot of the GNU and the Kernerl developers, open source was the be-all-and-end-all of the system. For me, it was having a fully working system.
Having to scour the net for non-OSS drivers and get them properly installed was a pain, compared to the rest of the Linux experience. They were more interested in keeping the core uncontaminated, rather than it actually working.
The same went for DRM and proprietary file formats. I hate DRM, but it is a fact of life, if you want to watch certain types of media, legally. Therefore, I had to abandon GNU/Linux in order to watch DVDs or some streamed content.
I think GNU/Linux would catch on faster, if they banded together and produced what the user wants/needs, as opposed to “you get what is idealogically correct, anything else you don’t need.”
I know what I need, and it is irrelevant to me, whether that comes under a closed source licence or an open source licence, I’ll use whatever does the task best, mixing and matching…
August 2nd, 2010 at 11:25 am
@David Wright: I could not agree with you more. My last foray into Ubuntu Linux I was marvelling at how smoothly the installation went and how far Linux had come since my last foray. Then I tried to install the driver for my ATI graphics card. I was greeted by an intemperate message box from Shuttleworth’s crew lambasting ATI for not making their driver open source. Not giving a fig about this ideological nonsense I installed the driver anyway only to find my desktop rendered unusable by a retaliatory graffiti attack from the ATI boys (understandably miffed they’d put a lot of work into writing a driver for Ubuntu only to be attacked for not doing something that was probably legally impossible).
Unfortunately I’m one of those people who cannot let go of a technical challenge until I’ve either solved it or have run out of approaches to try. A day later, I’d gotten the driver in without the graffiti and had learned more than I ever wanted to know about the differences between Linux distros. Unfortunately I’d also once again come to the conclusion that life is too short for this kind of time-sapping crap and gone back to Windows!
August 2nd, 2010 at 12:45 pm
Presumably this kind of dogmatic Cnutism is part of the reason why we tend to hear about Red Hat, SUSE, Ubuntu et cetera, since those terms don’t invoke the wrath of the Gnu (two words with swallowed glottal stops in one sentence! Kwality!). I’ve been hit by the ATi hissy fit thing, too: life’s too short. I put Windows back on the machine, because I had work to do.
August 2nd, 2010 at 11:14 pm
People caring for the freedom of the software is the only reason why you can USE GNU/Linux in the first place.
August 2nd, 2010 at 11:32 pm
I suspect Stallman has some form of autism so your article really is a slam piece against people who are different from you.
Are you gonna knock over some cripples next?
August 2nd, 2010 at 11:47 pm
Personally, I think of the “average end-user” as being like the middle class. Everyone knows it when they see it, but good luck describing it. The free software community doesn’t want or need the approval of anyone to keep operating. They’re content to be who they are and continue the development toward a future where what “just works” will in fact be free software. I daresay, those that make the claim “the proprietary driver for my cutting-edge laptop was impossible to find under GNU/Linux, so I used Windows 7″ really need to think about the community they put themselves in. If GNU/Linux doesn’t work for you and your “needs”, by all means, don’t use it. Meantime, if you want to make the stretch and value what you’ve got (and by the way, I’m posting this from a completely libre netbook), there’s a whole world out there to explore where you can use a full, free system and be proud of it.
August 3rd, 2010 at 7:44 am
@Jan I agree, we need the open source community, I just wish they weren’t so anal about inter-operating with non-open source software.
@Jim I was an official tester for SUSE for several years and have contributed to other open source projects over the years (as well as hundreds of proprietary). I am just not snobbish about the whole end-to-end experience being purely OSS, I just want it to work and use the best solution for each stage, regardless of whether it is OSS or close source…